Bru E, Forner L, Llena C, Almenar A. Fibre
post behaviour prediction factors. A review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dent.
2013;5(3):e150-3.
doi:10.4317/jced.50619
References
1.
Rodr’guez-Cervantes PJ, Sancho-Bru JL, Barjau-Escribano A, Forner-Navarro L,
PŽrez-Gonz‡lez AP, S‡nchez-Mar’n FT. Influence of prefabricated post dimensions
on restored maxillary central incisors. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:141-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01720.x
PMid:17244237
2.
Lassilla LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallitu PK. Flexural properties of
fiber reinforced root canals posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20:29-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4
PMid: 14698771
3.
Grande N, Butti A, Plotino G, Somma F. Adapting fiber-reinforced composite root
canal post for use in noncircular-shaped canals. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent.
2006;18:593-9.
PMid:17139954
4.
D'Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D'Amario M. The effect of resin cement
film thickness on the pull-out strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J
Prosthet Dent. 2007;98:193-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9
PMid: 17854620
5.
Gonz‡lez-Lluch C, Rodr’guez-Cervantes PJ, Sancho-Bru JL, PŽrez-Gonz‡lez AP,
Barjau-Escribano A, Vergara-Monedero M, et al. influence of material and diameter
of pre-fabricated posts on maxillary central incisors restored with crown. J
Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:737-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01989.x
PMid:19702682
6.
Barjau-Escribano A, Sancho-Bru JL, Forner-Navarro L, Rodr’guez-Cervantes PJ,
PŽrez-Gonz‡lez A, S‡nchez-Mar’n FT. influence of prefabricated post material on
restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent.
2006;31:47-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/04-169
PMid:16536193
7.
Plotino G, Grande NM, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Influence of surface remodeling
using burs on the macro and micro surface morphology of anatomically formed
fiber posts. Int Endod J. 2008;41:345-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01362.x
PMid:18217993
8.
Al-Omiri MK, Mahmoud AA, Rayyan MR, Abu-Hammad O. Fracture resistance of teeth
restored with post-retained restorations: an overview. J Endod.
2010;36:1439-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.005
PMid:20728706
9.
Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure
morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:307-12.
PMid:15237877
10.
Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borracchini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation
of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent.
2005;7:235-40.
PMid:16240965
11.
Bonfante EA, Pegoraro LF, de G—es MF, Carvalho RM. SEM observation of the bond
integrity of fiber-reinforced composite posts cemented into root canals. Dent
Mat. 2008;24:483-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.010
PMid:17675147
12.
Perez BE, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Zamboni SC, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, et al. Does
the thickness of the resin cement affect the bond strength of a fiber post to
the root dentin? Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:606-9.
PMid:17165301
13.
Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of
glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective observational
clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:519-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00257.x
PMid:16324143
14.
Naumann M, Reich S, Nothdurft F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fiber post
restorations over 5 years. Am J Dent. 2008;21:267-72.
PMid:18795525
15.
Coniglio I, Magni E, Cantoro A, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Push-out bond strength of
circular and oval-shaped fiber posts. Clin Oral Invest. 2011;15:667-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0448-0
PMid:20661607
16.
Lindblad RM, Lassila LV, Salo V, Vallittu PK, TjŠderhane L. Effect of
chlorhexidine on initial adhesion of fiber-reinforced post to root canal. J
Dent. 2010;38:796-801.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.011
PMid:20600556
17.
Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borrachini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of
cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent.
2005;7:235-40.
PMid:16240965
18.
Coniglio I, Carvalho CA, Magni E, Cantoro A, Ferrari M. Post space debridement
in oval-shaped canals: the use of a new ultrasonic tip with oval section. J
Endod. 2008;34:752-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.017
PMid:18498906
19.
Poggio C, Chiesa M, Lombardini M, Dagna A. Influence of ethanol drying on the
bond between fiber posts and root canals: SEM Analysis. Quintessence Int.
2011;42:e15-21.
PMid:21206926
20.
Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Effect of acid conditioning of root canal
dentin on the retention of adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced composite
(FRC) posts. Am J Dent. 2009;22:376-80.
PMid:20178216
21.
Nagase DY, de Freitas PM, Morimoto S, Oda M, Vieira GF. Influence of laser
irradiation on fiber post retention. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:377-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0861-2
PMid:21127931
22.
Porciani PF, Vano M, Radovic I, Goracci C, Grandini S, Garc’a-Godoy F, et al.
Fracture resistance of fiber posts: combinations of several small posts vs.
standardized single post. Am J Dent. 2008;21:373-6.
PMid:19146130
23.
Santos V, Perdig‹o J, Gomes G, Silva AL. Sealing ability of three fiber dowel
systems. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:566-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00482.x
PMid:19515165