Raichur PS, Setty SB, Thakur SL, Naikmasur VG. Comparison of Radiovisiography and Digital volume tomography to direct surgical measurements in the detection of infrabony defects. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012;4(1):e43-7.

doi:10.4317/jced.4.50711

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.4.50711

 

 

References

1. Jeffcoat MK. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1992; 63(Suppl.):367-372.

PMid:1573550

 

2. Reddy MS. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1992; 63(Suppl.): 1078-1084.

PMid:1479529

 

3. Fuhrmann RA, Bucker A, Diedrich PR. Assessment of alveolar bone loss with high resolution computed tomography. J Periodontal Res 1995; 30:258-263.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1995.tb02131.x

PMid:7562322

 

4. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Briefand J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31:126-130.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600680

 

5. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Cone Beam Tomography. In White SC, Pharoah MJ (eds) Oral Radiology, Principles and Interpretation.

 

6th ed. Pp 225-243.Noida, India: Elsevier 2009.

 

6. Wolf B, Von Bethlenfalvy E, Hassfeld S, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P. Reliability of assessing interproximal bone loss by digital radiography: intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 869–878.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028009869.x

PMid:11493358

 

7. Eickholz P, Hausmann E. Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2000; 108: 70–73.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.00729.x

PMid:10706480

 

8. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Periodontal Defect Measurements. J Periodontol 2006;77:1261-1266.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050367

PMid:16805691

 

9. Walter C, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU. Accuracy of three-dimensional imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 436–441.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01556.x

PMid:20374414

 

10. Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital Volume Tomography in the Diagnosis of Periodontal Defects: An In Vitro Study on Native Pig and Human Mandibles. J Periodontol 2005; 76:665-673.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.665

PMid:15898924

 

11. Grimard BA, Hoidal MA, Mills MP, Mellonig JT, Nummikoski PV and Mealey BL. Comparison of Clinical, Periapical Radiograph, and Cone-Beam Volume Tomography Measurement Techniques for Assessing Bone Level Changes Following Regenerative Periodontal Therapy. J Periodontol 2009; 80:48-55

http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080289

PMid:19228089

 

12. Persson GR. Effect of line angle versus mid-proximal periodontal probing measurements on prevalence estimates of periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res 1991;26:527-529

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1991.tb01805.x

PMid:1837057

 

13. Honda K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Saitou T, Shinoda K. Fundamental efficiency of new-style limited cone-beam CT (3DX): Comparison with helical- CT. Jpn J Tomogr 2001; 27:193-198.

 

14. Scarf G, Lurie AG, Mosier KM, Kantor ML, Ramsby GR, Freedman ML. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83:41-48.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90089-5