kaur J, Sharma N,
Singh H. In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post. J Clin Exp Dent.
2012;4(4):e204-9.
doi:10.4317/jced.50737
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.50737
References
1. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW.
Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth:
a literature review. J Endod. 2004;30:289-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
PMid:15107639
2. Martinez-Insua A,
Silva LD, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post
and core or carbon-fiber post with acomposite core.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:527-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70027-7
PMid: 9813801
3. King PA, Setchell DJ, Rees JS. Clinical evaluation of
a carbon fiber reinforced carbon endodontic post. Journal of
Oral Rehabilitation. 2003;30:785-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01178.x
PMid:12880400
4. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of
post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent.
1999;81:380-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80002-X
PMid: 10095205
5. Choi Y, Pae A,
Park EJ, Wright RF. The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of
a resin-based luting agent. J Prosthet Dent.
2010;103:362-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60078-9
PMid: 20493325
6. Bitter K, Kielbassa AM.
Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems:
a review. Am J Dent. 2007;20:353-60.
PMid:18269124
7. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture
of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems.
J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:431-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123227
PMid:12011860
8. Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, Navimipour EL. Effect of fiber post
and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolarsdirectly restored with composite resin.
J Endod. 2009;35:1428-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.010
PMid:19801245
9. Cormier CJ,
Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic and conventional post systems at various stages ofrestorations.
J Prosthodont. 2001;10:26-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00026.x
PMid:11406793
10. Arcangelo C, Angelis FD, Vadini M, Zazzeroni S, Ciampoli C, Amario MD.
In vitro fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless teeth restored with fiber posts andprepared for veneers.
JOE. 2008;34(7):838-41.
PMid:18570991
11. Testori T, Badino M, Castagnola M.
Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth:
a clinical survey of 36 cases. J Endod. 1993;19:87-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81202-1
PMid: 8509743
12. Insua MA, Silva LA, Rilo B
and Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post
and core or carbon-fiber post with acomposite core.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:527-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70027-7
PMid: 9813801
13. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J,
Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:360-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.75
PMid:12690348
14. Bitter K, Kielbassa AM.
Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems:
a review. Am J Dent. 2007;20:353–60.
PMid:18269124
15. Gonc¸Alves LA, Vansan LP,
Paulino SM, Sousa Neto MD. Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with a transilluminting post
and adhesive restorative materials. JProsthet Dent.
2006;96:339-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.030
PMid:17098497
16. Wu X, Chan AT, Chen YM,
Yip KH, Smales RJ. Effectiveness and dentin bond strengths of two materials for reinforcing thin-walled roots. Dent Mat.
2007;23:479-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.006
PMid:16698072
17. Marchi GM, Paulillo LA,
Pimenta LA, De Lima FA. Effect of different filling materials in combination with intraradicular posts on the resistance to fracture
of weakenedroots. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:623-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00990.x
PMid:12787460
18. Yoldas O, Akova T, Uysal H. An experimental analysis of stresses in simulated flared root canals subjected to various post-core applications.
J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32:427–32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01440.x
PMid:15899021
19. Sidoli GE, King PA and Setchell DI. An in
vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:5-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70080-5
PMid: 9237139
20. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in
vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of
vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-coresystems.
J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:262-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70267-2
PMid: 10050112
21. Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC. Effect of
fatigue testing on core integrity and postmicroleakage of teeth restored with different post systems.
J Endod 2003;29:125-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200302000-00010
PMid:12597713
22. Wells JD, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF,
Pereira PN. Intracoronal sealing ability of two dental cements.
J Endod 2002; 28:443–7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00006
PMid:12067125
23. Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM,
Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts.
J Endod. 1998;24:703-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80157-X
PMid: 9855817
24. Li LL, Wang ZY, Bai ZC, et
al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts.
ChinMed J. 2006;119:305-11.
PMid: 16537026
25. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Papacchini F,
et al. Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored using resin composite with orwithout translucent glass fiber posts.
J Endod. 2006;32:752-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.002
PMid:16861075
26. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH.
A structured analysis of
in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber,
metal and ceramic post-and-core systems.Int J Prosthodont.
2004;17:476-82.
PMid:15382786
27. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA,
Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:10-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70081-7
PMid: 9237140
28. Schmitter M,
Huy C, Ohlmann B, Gabbert O, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P.
Fracture resistance of upper and lower incisors restored with glass fiber reinforced posts.
J Endod. 2006;32:328-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.015
PMid:16554204
29. Tay FR, Pashley DH.
Monoblocks I root canals: A Hypothetical or a Tangible goal.
J Endod. 2007;33:391-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009
PMid:17368325
PMCid:2223075
30. Santos GC, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH.
Diametral tensile strength of
a resin composite core with non-metallic prefabricated posts: an in
vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:335-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.017
PMid:15116034