Turker SA, Yilmaz
Z, Ozcelik B, Gorduysus M, Altundasar E. Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal
after post space preparation. J Clin
Exp Dent. 2012;4(5):e260-5.
doi:10.4317/jced.50835
References
1. Gu
XH, Kern M. Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems
and luting agents. J
Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:918-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01672.x
PMid:17168934
2. Pashley
DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of
dentin to adhesive agents, Quint Int. 1993;24:618-31.
PMid: 8272500
3. Chappell, RP. Cobb CM, Spencer P,Eick JD. Dentinal tubule anastomosis: a potential factor in adhesive bonding?. J Prost Dent. 1994;72:183-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90078-7
PMid: 7932266
4. Serafino
C, Gallina G, Cumbo E,
Ferrari M. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron
microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod. 2004;97:381-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.004
PMid:15024364
5. Torabinejad
M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J,
Cho Y, Johnson WB, Bozhilov K, Kim J et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod. 2003;29:170-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200303000-00002
PMid:12669874
6. Lui
JN, Kuah HG,Chen
NN. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactant or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer. J Endod. 2007;33:472-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.007
PMid:17368342
7. Chopra S, Murray PE, Namerow KN. A scanning electron microscopic
evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a
K-file to remove smear layer. J Endod. 2008;34:1243-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.006
PMid:18793930
8. Carvalho AS, Camargo CH, Valera MC, Camargo SE, Mancini MN. Smear layer removal by auxiliary chemical substances
in biomechanical preparation: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod. 2008;34:1396-400.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.012
PMid:18928856
9. Serper
A, Calt S. The Demineralizing
effects of EDTA at Different Concentrations and Ph. J Endod.
2002;28:501-2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00002
PMid:12126374
10. De-Deus G, Reis C, Fidel S, Paciornik S. Dentine demineralization when subjected to
EDTA with or without various wetting agents: a co-site digital optical
microscopy study. Int Endod
J. 2008;41:279-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01345.x
PMid:18217997
11. Taşman
F, Cehreli ZC, Oğan C,
Etikan I. Surface tension of root canal irrigants. J Endod.
2000;26:586-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200010000-00002
PMid:11199798
12. Yilmaz
Z, Basbag B, Buzoglu HD, Gümüsderelioglu M. Effect of low-surface-tension EDTA
solutions on the wettability of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:109-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.08.008
PMid:21176825
13. Coniglio
I, Magni E, Goracci C, Radovic I, Carvalho CA, Grandini S, et al. Post space cleaning using a new nickel
titanium endodontic drill combined with different cleaning regimens. J Endod. 2008;34:83-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.019
PMid:18155500
14. Gu XH, Mao CY, Kern M. Effect of different irrigation on
smear layer removal after post Space Preparation. J Endod. 2009;35:583-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.006
PMid:19345810
15. Boone KJ, Murchison DF,
Schindler WG. Walker WA 3rd.Post retention: the effect of sequence of
post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod. 2001;27:768-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200112000-00014
PMid:11771587
16. Hülsmann
M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root
canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J. 2003;36:810-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00754.x
PMid: 14641420
17. Saito K, Webb TD, Imamura GM, Goodell GG. Effect of shortened
irrigation times with 17% ethylene diamine
tetra-acetic acid on smear layer removal after rotary canal instrumentation.
J Endod. 2008;34:1011-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.014
PMid:18634937
18. Philips RW. Skinner’s
2 Science of Dental Materials. Philadelphia PA. Sounders.
1991.
19. Glantz
PO, Hansson L. Wetting of dentine by some root canal medicaments. Odontol Revy.
1972;23:205-10.
PMid:4504494
20. Abou-Rass
M,Patonai FJ Jr. The effects of decreasing surface tension on the flow of irrigating
solutions in narrow root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.
1982;53:524-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90470-4
PMid: 6808432
21. Zehnder
M, Schicht O, Sener B, Schmidlin P. Reducing surface tension in endodontic chelator-solutions has no effect on their ability to remove
calcium from instrumented root canals. J Endod 2005;31:590-2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000152300.44990.6d
PMid:16044042
22. Sampaio JE, Theodoro LH, Correa
MA, Mendes AJ. A comparative SEM study of smear layer removal by detergents and
EDTA on the root surface. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:157-63.
PMid:15839592
23. Sampaio JE, Rached RS, Pilatti GL, Theodoro LH, Batista
LH. Effectiveness of EDTA and EDTA-T brushing on the removal of root
surface smear layer. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003;17:319-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912003000400005
PMid: 15107913
24. Lindskog
S, Blomlöf J, Blomlöf L.
Root surface conditioning. In: Hugoson A, Lundgren D,
Lindgren B. Guided periodontal tissue regeneration. Stockolm:
Gothia. 1995:127-38.
25. Scelza
MF, Pierro V, Scelza P,
Pereira M. Effect of three different time periods of irrigation with EDTA-T,
EDTA, and citric acid on smear layer removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98:499-503.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.03.027
PMid:15472668
26. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic
evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod. 1987;13:147-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80132-2
PMid: 3106553
27. Abbott PV, Heijkoop
PS, Cardaci SC, Hume WR, Heithersay
GS. An SEM study of the effects of different irrigation
sequences and ultrasonics. Int
Endod J. 1991;24:308-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00141.x
PMid:1820364
28. Guerisoli
DM, Marchesan MA, Walmsley
AD, Lumley PJ, Pecora JD. Evaluation
of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic
agitation. Int Endod
J. 2002;35:418-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00488.x
PMid:12059911
29. Gutarts
R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. In
vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary
instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2005;31:166-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000137651.01496.48
PMid:15735461