Darwazeh AM, Al-Aboosi MM, Bedair
AA. Does mechanical locking-base ceramic brackets reduce cracks at debonding?. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012;4(5):e266-70.
doi:10.4317/jced.50846
References
1. Bishara SE, Forrseca JM, Fehr DE, Boyer DB. Debonding forces applied to ceramic
brackets simulating clinical conditions. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:277-82.
PMid:7978522
2. Winchester LJ. Bond strengths
of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur
J Orthod. 1991;13:293-305.
PMid:1915618
3. Idiyatullin
D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood
M, Nixdorf DR. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible.
J Endod. 2011;37:745-52.
PMid: 21787482
4. Blalock KA, Powers JM.
Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1995;107:596-603.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70102-8
PMid: 7771364
5. Bishara SE, Fonseca JM, Boyer DB. The use of debonding pliers
in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1995;108:242-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70016-1
PMid: 7661139
6. Wang WN, Meng CL, Tarng TH. Bond strength: a comparison
between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal
brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:374-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80019-4
PMid: 9109582
7. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Effect of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:21-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2003.1
PMid:12532058
8. Kapur R, Sinha
PK, Nanda RS. Comparison of frictional
resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:271-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70237-4
PMid: 10474098
9. Bishara SE, Fehr DE. Ceramic
brackets: something old, something new –a review, Semin
Orthod. 1997;3:178.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(97)80068-0
PMid: 9573879
10. Olsen M, Bishara
S, Boyer D, Jakobson J. Effect of varying etching
times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109:403-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70122-1
PMid: 8638582
11. Bishara SE. Ceramic brackets and the need to develop
national standards. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop.
2000;117:595-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70212-5
PMid: 10799127
12. Eliades
T, Brantley W. The inappropriateness of conventional
orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur
J Orthod. 2000;22:13-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.1.13
PMid: 10721241
13. Fernandez L, Canut J. In vitro comparison of the
retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets. Eur
J Orthod. 1999;21:71-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.1.71
PMid: 10191580
14. van Waveren
Hogervorst WL, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. The air-abrasion technique versus the
conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and
a comparison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop.
2000;117:20-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70244-7
PMid: 10629516
15. Ajlouni
R, Bishara SE, Oonsombat C,
Soliman M, Laffoon J. The
effect of porcelain surface conditioning on bonding orthodontic brackets Angle Orthod. 2005;75:858-64.
PMid:16283817
16. Bishara
SE, Oonsombat C, Soliman
MM, Warren JJ, Laffoon JF, Ajlouni
R. Comparison of bonding time and shear bond strength between a conventional
and a new integrated bonding system. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:237-42.
PMid:15825789
17. Arnold RW, Combe
EC, Warford JH Jr. Bonding of stainless steel
brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:274-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125712
PMid:12226608
18. Habibi
M, Nik TH, Hooshmand T.
Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and
ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. Am
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:675-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.040
PMid:18005843
19. Olsen ME, Bishara
SE, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of Scotchbond Multipurpose and maleic
acid as alternative methods of bonding orthodontic brackets. Am
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:498-501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70286-5
PMid: 9155808
20. Arici
S, Minors C. The force levels required to mechanically debond
ceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod.
2000;22:327-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.3.327
PMid: 10920565
21. Liu JK, Chung CH, Chang CY, Shieh DB. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 2005;128:761-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.041
PMid:16360918
22. Chen HY,
Su MZ, Chang HF, Chen YJ, Lan WH, Lin CP. Effects of
different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in
simulated clinical set-ups. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop.
2007;132:680-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.035
PMid:18005844
23. Bishara
SE, Ostby AW, Laffoon J,
Warren JJ. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding
in vitro. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:1078-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/112007-540.1
PMid:18947289
24. Tehranchi A, Fekrazad R, Zafar M, Eslami B, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N. Evaluation of the effects of CO2
laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets
vs. the conventional method. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:563-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0820-y
PMid:20725757
25. Heravi
F, Rashed R, Raziee L. The effects of bracket removal on enamel. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24:110-5.
PMid:19113075
26. Tecco
S, Tetè S, D'Attilio M, Festa F. Enamel surface after debracketing
of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable
orthodontic composite. A comparison with a traditional
orthodontic composite resin. Minerva Stomatol.
2008;57:81-94.
PMid:18427376
27. Sinha PK, Nanda RS. The effect of
different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1997;112:132-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70237-3
PMid: 9267223
28. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of different
ceramic brackets enamels conditioners and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:170-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81007-8
PMid: 8338070
29. Shahabi M, Heravi F, Mokhber N, Karamad R, Bishara SE. Effects on shear bond strength and
the enamel surface with an enamel bonding agent. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:375-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.030
PMid:20197175
30. Lee RT. How to ... debond Clarity brackets with ease. J Orthod.
PMid: 16333049