Uroz-Torres D,
González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Shaping ability of Mtwo and
Twisted File rotary systems in curved root canals. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012;4(5):e275-80.
doi:10.4317/jced.50867
References
1. Peters OA. Current challenges
and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30:559-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
PMid:15273636
2. Greene KJ, Krell
KV. Clinical factors associated with ledged canals in maxillary and mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.
1990;70:490-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90217-G
PMid: 2216387
3. Schäfer
E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary
nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping
ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2004;37:229-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00786.x
PMid:15056349
4. Walia
HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol
root canal files. J Endod.
1988;14:346-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
PMid: 3251996
5. Gambill
JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium
and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996;22:369-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80221-4
PMid: 8935064
6. Setzer
FC, Kwon TK, Karabucak B. Comparison of apical
transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary
instrumentation sequences. J Endod.
2010;36:1226-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.011
PMid:20630304
7. Iqbal
MK, Maggiore F, Suh B, Edwards KR, Kang J, Kim S.
Comparison of apical transportation in four Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation
techniques. J Endod. 2003;29:587-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200309000-00011
PMid:14503833
8. Schäfer
E, Erler M, Dammaschke T.
Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments: part 1—shaping ability in simulated
curved canals. Int Endod J.
2006;39:196-202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
PMid:16507073
9. Schäfer
E, Erler M, Dammaschke T.
Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments: part 2—cleaning effectiveness and shaping
ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int
Endod J. 2006;39:203-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01075.x
PMid:16507074
10. Zhang EW, Cheung GS, Zheng YF. Influence of cross-sectional design and dimension
on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and
bending: a numerical analysis. J Endod.
2010;36:1394-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.017
PMid:20647104
11. Schäfer
E, Oitzinger M. Cutting efficiency of five different
types of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2008;34:198-200.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.009
PMid:18215681
12. Plotino
G, Grande NM, Melo MC, Bahia MG, Testarelli
L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of NiTi
rotary instruments in a simulated apical abrupt curvature. Int
Endod J. 2010;43:226-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01668.x
PMid:20158534
13. Shahi
S, Mokhtari H, Rahimi S, Shiezadeh V, Ashasi H, Abdolrahimi M, Foroughreyhani M.
Electrochemical corrosion assessment of RaCe and Mtwo rotary nickle-titanium
instruments after clinical use and sterilization. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e331-6.
PMid: 22143690
14. Gambarini
G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma
F, Garala M, De Luca M, Testarelli
L. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments
produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod.
2008;34:1003-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007
PMid:18634935
15. Gergi
R, Rjeily JA, Sader J, Naaman A. Comparison of canal transportation and centering
ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system,
and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography. J Endod. 2010;36:904-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.038
PMid:20416443
16. Kuttler
S, Garala M, Perez R, Dorn SO. The endodontic cube: a
system designed for evaluation of root canal anatomy and canal preparation. J Endod. 2001;27:533-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200108000-00008
PMid:11501592
17. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes
DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997;23:77-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6
PMid: 9220735
18. Iqbal
MK, Firic S, Tulcan J, Karabucak B, Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation
between ProFile and ProTaper
NiTi rotary instruments. Int
Endod J. 2004;37:359-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00792.x
PMid:15186241
19. Peters
OA, Laib A, Göhring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after
preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod. 2001;27:1-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200101000-00001
PMid:11487156
20. Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP. A methodology for
evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endod. 1987;13:243-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80099-7
PMid: 3473181
21. Aguiar CM, Câmara AC. Radiological evaluation of the morphological changes
of root canals shaped with ProTaper for hand use and
the ProTaper and RaCe
rotary instruments. Aust Endod
J. 2008;34:115-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00109.x
PMid:19032646
22. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparation in straight and curved root
canals. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
PMid: 5284110
23. Thompson SA. An overview of
nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000;33:297-310.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00339.x
PMid:11307203
24. Uroz-Torres D,
González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Effectiveness of a manual glide
path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo
rotary instruments. J Endod.
2009;35:699-702.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.001
PMid:19410086
25. Bürklein
S, Schäfer E. The influence of
various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo
rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J. 2006;39:945-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01171.x
PMid:17107539
26. Veltri
M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
Int Endod J. 2005;38:610-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00989.x
PMid:16104974
27. Martín-Micó
M, Forner-Navarro L, Almenar-García
A. Modification of the working length after rotary instrumentation: a
comparative study of four systems. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:153-7.
PMid: 19242397
28. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical
root fillings in curved root canals: part I—effects of apical transportation on
seal of root fillings. J Endod.
2000;26:210-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003
PMid:11199720
29. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The ‘‘balanced force’’ concept for instrumentation of
curved canals. J Endod. 1985;11:203-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3
PMid: 3858415
30. Park SY, Cheung GS, Yum J, Hur B, Park JK, Kim HC. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
J Endod. 2010;36:1200-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.016
PMid:20630299