Montero J, Macedo de Paula C, Albaladejo A. The “TORONTO PROSTHESIS”, an appealing method for restoring patients candidates for hybrid overdentures: A case report. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012;4(5):e309-12.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.50877

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.50877

 

References

1. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18;719-28.

PMid:14579961                                            

                                                          

2. Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant Dent. 2010;19:8-15.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181bb9033

PMid:20147811                                            

                                                          

3. Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations. Br Dent J. 2006;201:501-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4814157

PMid:17057675                                            

                                                          

4. Lewis S, Beumer J 3rd, Hornburg W, Moy P. The "UCLA" abutment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:183-9.

PMid:3074050                                               

                                                          

5. Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. Cement - and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: Up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:87-91.

PMid:14982360                                            

                                                          

6. Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater. 2011;27:83-96.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.024

PMid:21094996                                            

                                                          

7. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:493-502.

PMid:21209982                                            

                                                          

8. Guichet DL, Caputto A, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:239-46.

PMid:10795456                                            

                                                          

9. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:66-75.

PMid:10697941                                            

                                                          

10. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:30-7.

PMid:14982352                                            

                                                          

11. Cicciù M, Risitano G, Maiorana C, Franceschini G. Parametric analysis of the strength in the ''Toronto'' osseous-prosthesis system. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58:9-23.

PMid:19234433