Poonacha V, Poonacha S, Salagundi B, P-L R, Raghavan R. In vitro comparison of flexural strength and elastic modulus of three provisional crown materials used in fixed prosthodontics. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5(5):e212-7.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.51136

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.51136

 

References

1. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA. Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:225-8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121406

PMid:11854681

 

2. Strassler HE. Fixed prosthodontics provisional materials: making the right selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34:22-4, 26.

PMid:23550328

 

3. Wassell RW, St George G, Ingledew RP, Steele JG. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: provisional restorations. Br Dent J. 2002;192:619-22, 625-30.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801316

PMid:12108942

 

4. Koumjian JH, Nimmo A. Evaluation of fracture resistance of resins used for provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent.1990;64:654-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90290-S

 PMid:2079670

 

5. Perry RD, Magnuson B. Provisional materials: key components of interim fixed restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33:59-60, 62.

PMid:22432178

 

6. Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. II. Determination of activation energy and reaction order. Caries Res. 1978;12:213-22.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000260335

PMid:28847

 

7. Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:129-32.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.112797

PMid:11208201

 

8. Osman YI, Owen CP. Flexural strength of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:94-6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90038-P

 PMid: 8366461

 

9. Scherrer SS, Wiskott AH, Coto-Hunziker V, Belser UC. Monotonic flexure and fatigue strength of composites for provisional and definitive restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:579-88.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00174-4

 PMid: 12815352

 

10. Ireland MF, Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Ramp MH. In vitro mechanical property comparison of four resins used for the fabrication of provisional fixed restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:158-62.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70104-0

 PMid: 9710816

 

11. Asad T, Watkinson AC, Huggett R. The effect of disinfection procedures on flexural properties of denture base acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:191-5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90303-R

 PMid: 1403907

 

12. Akova T, Ozkomur A, Uysal H. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of provisional restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2006;22:1130-4.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.09.009

PMid:16386787

 

13. Larson WR, Dixon DL, Aquilino SA, Clancy JM. The effect of carbon graphite fiber reinforcement on the strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:816-20.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90425-V

 PMid: 1805039

 

14. Kamble VD, Parkhedkar RD. In vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of two different fiber reinforcements on the fracture toughness of provisional restorative resins. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23:140-4.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.100415

PMid:22945699

 

15. Ogle RE, Sorensen SE, Lewis EA. A new visible light-cure resin system applied to removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56:497-506.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90397-5

PMid: 3463760