Barabanti N, Preti A, Vano M, Derchi G, Mangani F, Cerutti A. Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(1):e54-9.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.51604

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.51604

 

References

1. Barabanti N, Gagliani M, Roulet JF, Testori T, Ozcan M, Cerutti A. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial. J Dent. 2013;41:436-42.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.009

PMid:23454329                                                

                                                              

2. Acquaviva PA, Cerutti F, Adami G, Gagliani M, Ferrari M, Gherlone E, et al. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. J Dent. 2009;37:610-5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.001

PMid:19450917                                                

                                                              

3. Vieno S, Madini L, Barabanti N, Alessandri I, Gagliani M, Cerutti A. Indirect resin composite restorations: evaluation of polymerization of luting agents by means of micro-Raman spectrophotometry. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58:1-8.

PMid:19234432                                                

                                                              

4. Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconini S, Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: a 3-year study. Quintessence International. 2008;39:65-71.

PMid:18551219                                                

                                                              

5. Burke FJT, Qualtrough AJE. Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic. British Dental Journal. 1994;176:53-60.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808363  

PMid: 8117475                                 

                                                              

6. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of three composite resins for the inlay/onlay technique. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1991;66:322-4.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90257-W

PMid: 1800727                                                 

                                                              

7. Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4:192-8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007840000086

PMid:11218488                                                

                                                              

8. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth .Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999;82:391-97.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70025-9

PMid: 10512957                               

                                                              

9. Wasell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three year clinical results. British Dental Journal. 1995;179:343-49.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808919                                  

PMid: 7495630  

                                                              

10. Van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: An 11 year follow-up. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:299-306.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00010-5

PMid: 10785294                               

                                                              

11. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:375-82.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00013-0

PMid: 10785294                                               

                                                              

12. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clinical Oral Investigation. 2007;11:5-33.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7

PMid:17262225                                                

                                                              

13. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1994;52:234-42.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016359409029052

PMid:7985509                                                  

                                                              

14. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):60D-76D

PMid:11763920                                                

                                                              

15. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry—a review. Int Dent J. 2000;50:1-12.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x

PMid:10945174                                                

                                                              

16. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holtz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence International. 1995;26:127-38.

PMid:7568723                                                  

                                                              

17. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Operative Dentistry. 1990;15:129-35.

PMid:2216905                                                  

                                                              

18. Ferrari M, Dagostin A, Fabianelli A. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system. Dental Materials. 2003;19:270-6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00040-4

PMid: 12686290                               

                                                              

19. Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dental Materials. 2001;18:347-53.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00093-2

PMid: 11356212               

                                                              

20. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composite. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:466-72.                               

PMid: 11203858

                                                              

21. Spreafico RC, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:499-507.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.009

PMid:15935270                                                

                                                              

22. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999;82:391-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70025-9

PMid: 10512957                               

                                                              

23. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1997;78:346-53.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70041-6

PMid: 9338865                                                 

                                                              

24. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behaviour. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:459-65.

PMid:11203857                                                

                                                              

25. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Composite and ceramic inlays after 3 years of clinical service. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:95-9.

PMid:11507807                                                

                                                              

26. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:129-32.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00027-9

PMid: 9175350                                 

                                                              

27. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:45-64.

PMid:11317384                                                

                                                              

28. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:481-508.

PMid:15470871