Barabanti N, Preti A, Vano M, Derchi
G, Mangani F, Cerutti A.
Indirect composite restorations luted with two
different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial. J
Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(1):e54-9.
doi:10.4317/jced.51604
References
1. Barabanti
N, Gagliani M, Roulet JF, Testori T, Ozcan
M, Cerutti A. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised
split mouth trial. J Dent. 2013;41:436-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.009
PMid:23454329
2. Acquaviva PA, Cerutti F, Adami G, Gagliani M, Ferrari M, Gherlone
E, et al. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive
cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. J Dent. 2009;37:610-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.001
PMid:19450917
3. Vieno
S, Madini L, Barabanti N, Alessandri I, Gagliani M, Cerutti A. Indirect resin composite restorations:
evaluation of polymerization of luting agents by means
of micro-Raman spectrophotometry. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58:1-8.
PMid:19234432
4. Barone
A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconini
S, Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of
bonded composite inlays: a 3-year study. Quintessence
International. 2008;39:65-71.
PMid:18551219
5. Burke FJT, Qualtrough AJE. Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic. British Dental Journal. 1994;176:53-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808363
PMid: 8117475
6. Peutzfeldt
A, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of three
composite resins for the inlay/onlay technique. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1991;66:322-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90257-W
PMid: 1800727
7. Manhart
J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of
composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4:192-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007840000086
PMid:11218488
8. Scheibenbogen
A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann
KH, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct
and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth .Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry. 1999;82:391-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70025-9
PMid: 10512957
9. Wasell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays
versus conventional composite restorations: Three year clinical results. British Dental Journal. 1995;179:343-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808919
PMid: 7495630
10. Van Dijken
JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: An 11 year
follow-up. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:299-306.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00010-5
PMid: 10785294
11. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays
versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:375-82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00013-0
PMid: 10785294
12. Hickel
R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze
SD, Mjor IA, Peters M. Recommendations for conducting
controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clinical
Oral Investigation. 2007;11:5-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7
PMid:17262225
13. Jokstad
A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontologica
Scandinavica. 1994;52:234-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016359409029052
PMid:7985509
14. Krämer
N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger
R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J
Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):60D-76D
PMid:11763920
15. Tyas MJ, Anusavice
KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal
intervention dentistry—a review. Int Dent J.
2000;50:1-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x
PMid:10945174
16. Dietschi
D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holtz J. Marginal
adaptation and seal of direct and indirect class II composite resin
restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence
International. 1995;26:127-38.
PMid:7568723
17. Peutzfeldt
A, Asmussen E. A comparison of
accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay
techniques. Operative Dentistry. 1990;15:129-35.
PMid:2216905
18. Ferrari M, Dagostin A, Fabianelli A.
Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a
self-curing resin system. Dental Materials. 2003;19:270-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00040-4
PMid: 12686290
19. Irie
M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap
formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dental Materials. 2001;18:347-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00093-2
PMid: 11356212
20. Krämer
N, Frankenberger R. Leucite-reinforced
glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting
composite. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:466-72.
PMid: 11203858
21. Spreafico
RC, Krejci I, Dietschi D.
Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:499-507.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.009
PMid:15935270
22. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner
A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Two-year
clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior
teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999;82:391-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70025-9
PMid: 10512957
23. Fradeani
M, Aquilano A, Bassein L.
Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1997;78:346-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70041-6
PMid: 9338865
24. Frankenberger
R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behaviour.
Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:459-65.
PMid:11203857
25. Manhart
J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner
A, Hickel R. Composite and ceramic inlays after 3
years of clinical service. American Journal of Dentistry.
2001;14:95-9.
PMid:11507807
26. Geurtsen
W, Schoeler U. A 4-year
retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations.
Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:129-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00027-9
PMid: 9175350
27. Hickel
R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior
teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry.
2001;3:45-64.
PMid:11317384
28. Manhart
J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical
survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the
permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:481-508.
PMid:15470871