Maglione M, Costantinides F, Bazzocchi G. Classification of impacted mandibular third molars on cone-beam CT images. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(2):e224-31.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.51984

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.51984

 

References

1. de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1030-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.020
PMid:16781335

 

2. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:253-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.060
PMid:17234544

 

3. Dawood A, Brown J, Sauret-Jackson V, Purkayastha S. Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:70-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/16421849
PMid:22184628 PMCid:PMC3520272

 

4. Durack C, Patel S. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Braz Dent J. 2012;23:179-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000300001
PMid:22814684

 

5. Dalessandri D, Bracco P, Paganelli C, Hernandez Soler V, Martin C. Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8:230-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcs.458
PMid:22315209

 

6. Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Heinrich S, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:412-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.008
PMid:17321455

 

7. Kadkhodazadeh M, Amid R. A new classification for the relationship between periodontal, periapical, and peri-implant complications. Iran Endod J. 2013;8:103-8.
PMid:23922570 PMCid:PMC3734511

 

8. Carvalho RW, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2714-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.097
PMid:21752507

 

9. Barbosa-Rebellato NL, Thomé AC, Costa-Maciel C, Oliveira J, Scariot R. Factors associated with complications of removal of third molars: a transversal study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e376-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e376
PMid:21196877

 

10. Freudlsperger C, Deiss T, Bodem J, Engel M, Hoffmann J. Influence of lower third molar anatomic position on postoperative inflammatory complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:1280-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.12.014
PMid:22310456

 

11. Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Evaluation of intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement on classifying lower third molars according to the systems of Pell and Gregory and of Winter. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:893-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.09.011
PMid:18423277

 

12. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:20-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(90)90005-6

PMid:2322523

 

13. Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1678-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.032
PMid:18634957

 

14. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:3-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.217
PMid:15635549

 

15. Jhamb A, Dolas RS, Pandilwar PK, Mohanty S. Comparative efficacy of spiral computed tomography and orthopantomography in preoperative detection of relation of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle to the impacted mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:58-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.014
PMid:19070749

 

16. Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:291-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0200-1
PMid:18446390

 

17. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:276-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.021
PMid:20123411

 

18. Nakayama K, Nonoyama M, Takaki Y, Kagawa T, Yuasa K, Izumi K, et al. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2587-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.017
PMid:19925976

 

19. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:964-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.007
PMid:19640685

 

20. Sammartino G, Wang HL, Citarella R, Lepore M, Marenzi G. Analysis of occlusal stresses transmitted to the inferior alveolar nerve by multiple threaded implants. J Periodontol. 2013;84:1655-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120611

PMid:23347345

 

21. Martí E, Pe-arrocha M, García B, Martínez JM, Gay-Escoda C. Distance between periapical lesion and mandibular canal as a factor in periapical surgery in mandibular molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2461-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.033
PMid:19022124

 

22. Park W, Choi JW, Kim JY, Kim BC, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Cortical integrity of the inferior alveolar canal as a predictor of paresthesia after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:271-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0160
PMid:20194382

 

23. Susarla SM, Sidhu HK, Avery LL, Dodson TB. Does computed tomographic assessment of inferior alveolar canal cortical integrity predict nerve exposure during third molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1296-1303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.01.021
PMid:20356665

 

24. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2002;35:56-62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00452.x
PMid:11853239

 

25. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1303-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.028
PMid:17577493