Asgary S, Nikneshan S, Akbarzadeh-Bagheban A, Emadi N. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and dimensional measurements by using CBCT in mandibular first molars. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(1):e1-8.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.52570

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.52570

 

References

1. Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PMH. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2011;44:162-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01826.x
PMid:21091495

 

2. Tachibana H, Matsumoto K. Applicability of X-ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6:16-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1990.tb00381.x
PMid:2390962

 

3. Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD, Carnes DL, Lancaster J. Microcomputed tomography: an advanced system for detailed endodontic research. J Endod. 1995;21:561-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80986-6

PMid:8601767

 

4. Rhodes J, Ford T, Lynch J, Liepins P, Curtis R. Micro-computed tomography: a new tool for experimental endodontology. Int Endod J. 1999;32:165-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00204.x
PMid:10530203

 

5. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J. 2009;42:447-62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01530.x
PMid:19298577

 

6. Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar AHG, Mattar R, Valladares Neto J, Azevedo BC, et al. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35:1491-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.009
PMid:19840636

 

7. Tarazona-Álvarez P, Romero-Millán J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Fuster-Torres MÁ, Tarazona B, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Comparative study of mandibular linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography and digital calipers. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6:e271-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51426
PMid:25136429 PMCid:PMC4134857

 

8. Fatemitabar SA, Nikgoo A. Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:499-505.
PMid:20556248

 

9. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:150-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/122407-599.1
PMid:19123719

 

10.Kamburoğlu K, Kolsuz E, Kurt H, Kılıç C, Özen T, Paksoy CS. Accuracy of CBCT measurements of a human skull. J Digit Imaging. 2011;24:787-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9339-9
PMid:20857166 PMCid:PMC3180546

 

11. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:387-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/122106-52.1
PMid:18416632

 

12. Benninger B, Peterson A, Cook V. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:302-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.014
PMid:21684648

 

13. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:S100-S8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.040
PMid:20381750

 

14. Stratemann S, Huang J, Maki K, Miller A, Hatcher D. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/31349994
PMid:18239035

 

15. Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26:813-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9562-7
PMid:23254628 PMCid:PMC3705012

 

16. Gu Y, Zhou P, Ding Y, Wang P, Ni L. Root Canal Morphology of Permanent Three-rooted Mandibular First Molars: Part III—An Odontometric Analysis. J Endod. 2011;37:485-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.013
PMid:21419295

 

17. Bellucci C, Perrini N.A study on the thickness of radicular dentine and in anterior and premolar teeth. Int Endod J. 2002;35:594-606.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00537.x
PMid:12190899

 

18. Caputo A, Standlee J. Pins and posts--why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am. 1976;20:299-311.
PMid:1062314

 

19. Souza E, Bretas R, Cenci M, Maia-Filho E, Bonetti-Filho. Periapical radiographs overestimate root canal wall thickness during post space preparation. Int Endod J. 2008;41:658-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01410.x
PMid:18479369

 

20. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004;30:289-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
PMid:15107639

 

21. Sanfelice CM, da Costa FB, MVR, Vier-Pelisser F, Bier CAS, Grecca FS. Effects of four instruments on coronal pre-enlargement by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2010;36:858-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.003
PMid:20416433

 

22. Kessler JR, Peters DD, Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1983;9:439-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80260-X

PMid:6579170

 

23. Lim S, Stock C. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J. 1987;20:33-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00586.x
PMid:3468086

 

24. Tabrizizadeh M, Reuben J, Khalesi M, Mousavinasab M, Ezabadi MKG. Evaluation of Radicular Dentin Thickness of Danger Zone in Mandibular First Molars. J Dent (Tehran). 2010;7:196-9.

PMid:21998796

 

25. de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: clinical implications and recommendations. Quintessence Int. 2012;43:15-27.
PMid:22259805

 

26. Demirbuga S, Sekerci AE, Dincer AN, Cayabatmaz M, Zorba YO. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e737-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18473
PMid:23524421 PMCid:PMC3731107

 

27. Jou YT, Karabucak B, Levin J, Liu D. Endodontic working width: current concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:323-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.006
PMid:15066519

 

28. Wu MK, R'oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR. Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:739-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106344

PMid:10846130

 

29. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy-a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod. 2010;36:679-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.036
PMid:20307744

 

30. Council on Dental Materials I, Equipment. Revised ANSI/ADA specifications no. 28* for root canal files and reamers, type K, and no. 58+ for root canal files, type H (Hedstrom). J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;118:239-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0230
PMid:2918154