|
1. Siqueira JF Jr,
Araújo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of
the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques
for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J
Endod. 1997;23:499-502.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80309-3
PMid:9587319
|
|
|
|
2. Wu MK, Dummer PM, Wesselink
PR. Consequences of and strategies to deal with
residual post-treatment root canal infection. Int Endod
J. 2006;39:343-56.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01092.x
PMid:16640632
|
|
|
|
|
3. Peters OA. Current
challenges and concepts in the preparation of root
canal systems: a review. J
Endod. 2004;30:559-67.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
PMid:15273636
|
|
|
|
|
4. Taha
NA, Ozawa T, Messer HH. Comparison of three
techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals. J
Endod. 2010;36:532-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.015
PMid:20171378
|
|
|
|
|
5. Jou
YT, Karabucak B, Levin J,
Liu D. Endodontic working width: current concepts and
techniques. Dent Clin North
Am. 2004;48:323-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.006
PMid:15066519
|
|
|
|
|
6. De-Deus G,
Souza EM, Barino B, Maia J, Zamolyi
RQ, Reis C, et al. The self-adjusting file
optimizes debridement quality in oval-shaped root
canals. J Endod. 2011;37:701-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.001
PMid:21496675
|
|
|
|
|
7. Busquim
S, Cunha RS, Freire L, Gavini G, Machado ME, Santos M. A
micro-computed tomography evaluation of long-oval
canal preparation using reciprocating or rotary
systems. Int
Endod J. 2015;48:1001-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12398
PMid:25314154
|
|
|
|
|
8. Ruckman
JE, Whitten B, Sedgley CM, Svec T. Comparison of the
self-adjusting file with rotary and hand
instrumentation in long-oval-shaped root canals. J
Endod. 2013;39:92-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.002
PMid:23228264
|
|
|
|
|
9. Williamson AE, Sandor AJ, Justman
BC. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary
systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile
GT, for canal-cleaning ability. J
Endod. 2009;35:107-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.022
PMid:19084136
|
|
|
|
|
10. Hilaly
Eid GE, Wanees
Amin SA. Changes in
diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of
canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation
techniques in long-oval canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod. 2011;112:688-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.007
PMid:21862367
|
|
|
|
|
11. Wu MK, van der Sluis
LW, Wesselink PR. The
capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to
remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int
Endod J. 2003;36:218-24.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00646.x
PMid:12657148
|
|
|
|
|
12. Grande NM, Plotino G, Butti
A, Messina F, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Cross-sectional analysis
of root canals prepared with NiTi
rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating
files. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.
2007;103:120-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.022
PMid:17178505
|
|
|
|
|
13. De-Deus G,
Barino B, Zamolyi RQ, Souza E, Fonseca A Jr, Fidel S, et al. Suboptimal debridement
quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped
canals. J Endod. 2010;36:1897-900.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.009
PMid:20951309
|
|
|
|
|
14. Paqué
F, Balmer M, Attin T, Peters OA. Preparation
of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular
molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A
micro-computed tomography study. J
Endod. 2010;36:703-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.020
PMid:20307747
|
|
|
|
|
15. Clauder
T, Baumann MA. ProTaper NT
system. Dent Clin North Am.
2004;48:87-111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.10.006
PMid:15066509
|
|
|
|
|
16. Weiger
R, ElAyouti A, Löst C. Efficiency of hand and
rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals. J
Endod. 2002
;28:580-3.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200208000-00004
PMid:12184418
|
|