Carlo B, Barabanti N, Piccinelli G, Faus-Matoses V, Cerutti A. Microbiological characterization and effect of resin composites in cervical lesions. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(1):e40-5.

doi:10.4317/jced.52978

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.52978

References

1. Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesion: the decision to ignore or restore. J Eshetic Dent. 1992;4:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00721.x PMid:1298328

2. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthetic Dent. 1991;1:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x PMid:1873064

3. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:1028-32. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106608.x PMid:9879915

4. Grippo JO, Simring M, Sxchreiner S. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited: a new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:1109-18. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0369 PMid:15387049

5. Rees JS, Hammaddeh M. undermining of enamel as amechanism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:347-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00143.x PMid:15279654

6. Litonjua LA, Bush PJ, Andreana S, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Effects of occlusal load on cervical lesions. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:225-32. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01226.x PMid:15025654

7. Rees JS, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesions: myth or reality? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15:263-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00297.x PMid:14620657

8. Blunck U. Improving Cervical Restorations: A Review of Materials and Techniques. J Adhesive Dent. 2001;3:33-44. PMid:11317383

9. Yoshiyama M, Takashi M. Adhesion to Wedge-shaped Defects and Treatments of Dentin Hypersensitivity. Modern Trends in Adhesive Dentistry Proceedings of the Adhrsive Dentistry Forum '98 in Sapporo. February 21,1998; 27-37.

10. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing capacity of resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in class V restorations. Operative Den.t 1996;21 69-72. PMid:8957921

11. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in class V and class II preparations. J Dent. 1997;25:375-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00060-7 PMid:9241956

12. Osborne–Smith KL, Burke FJT, Mc Farlane T, Wilson NHF. Effect of restored and unrestored non-carious cervical lesions on the fracture resistance of previously restored maxillary premolar teeth. J Dent. 1998;26:427-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00029-8 PMid:9699433

13. Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: the decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent. 1992;4:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00721.x PMid:1298328

14. Mercuri M, Montebugnoli L, Prati C. Formazione del biofilm orale sui materiali da restauro. Dental Cadmos. 2001;13:25-42.

15. Hannig M. Ultrastructural investigation of pellicle morphogenesis at two different intraoral sites during a 24-h period. Clinic Oral Investig. 1999;3:88-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050084 PMid:10803117

16. Poggio C, Genova U, Lombardini M, Rindi S, Visai L. Resine composite e adesione batterica: osservazioni al SEM. Atti del VII Congresso Nazionale S.I.D.O.C. Sessione posters. ROMA 6-7-8-febbraio. 2003;73-77.