Goel A, Singh A, Gupta T, Gambhir RS.  Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents: An in-vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(5):e608-16.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.53237

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.53237

 

References

 

1. Hosein I, Sheriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentfacial Orthop. 2004;126:717-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.032

PMid:15592221

 

2. da Rocha JM, Gravina MA, da Silva Campos MJ, Quintão CC, Elias CN, Vitral RW. Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014;19:77-85.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.077-085.oar
PMid:24713563 PMCid:PMC4299420

 

3. Bishara S, Truelove T. Comparisons of different debonding tech-niques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop .1990;98:145-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70008-Z

PMid:2198800

 

4. Bonetti GA, Zanarini M, Parenti SI, Lattuca M, Marchionni S, Gatto MR. Evaluation of enamel surface after bracket debonding: An in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:696-702.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.027
PMid:22051490

 

5. Habibi M, Nik TH, Hooshmand T. Comparison of the debonding chararcteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:675-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.040
PMid:18005843

 

6. Ozer T, Basaran A, Kama JD. Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:368-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.025
PMid:20197174

 

7. Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, Makou M. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:333-8.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.3.333
PMid:15222720

 

8. Banerjee A, Paolinelis G, Socker M, McDonald F, Watson TF. An in vitro investigation of the effectiveness of bioactive glass air-abrasion in the 'selective' removal of orthodontic resin adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116:488-92.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00561.x
PMid:18821993

 

9. Ahrari F, Akbari M, Akbari J, Dabiri G. Enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques. J Dent (Tehran). 2013;10:82-93.

PMid:23724206 PMCid:PMC3666068

 

10. Sharma S, Cross SE, Hsueh C, Wali RP, Stieg AZ, Gimzewski JK. Nanocharacterization in dentistry. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:2523-45.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11062523
PMid:20640166 PMCid:PMC2904930

 

11. Ulusoy Ç. Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17;209-15.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015
PMid:19466253 PMCid:PMC4399534

 

12. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8

PMid:6231863

 

13. Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ, Coury TL. Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials. Dent Res. 1996;27:279-84.

PMid:8941847

 

14. Yamada R, Hayakawa T, Kasai K. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:558-64.
PMid:12518948

 

15. Howell S, Weekes WT. An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures. Aust Dent J. 1990;35:245-52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb05402.x
PMid:2203330

 

16. Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:258-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70007-B

PMid:8456784

 

17. Retief DH, Denys FR. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments. Angle Orthod. 1979;49:1-10.
PMid:369407

 

18. Zarrinia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: An in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:284-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70023-4

 

19. Zachrisson BU. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Varnasdal RJ, (Editors). Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, 2nd ed., Ch. 10. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994.p. 570-83.