Aracena D, Borie E, Betancourt P, Aracena A, Guzmán M. Wear of the Primary WaveOne single file when shaping vestibular root canals of first maxillary molar. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3):e368-71.

doi:10.4317/jced.53384

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.53384

References

1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18:269-96. PMid:4522570

2. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30:559-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D PMid:15273636

3. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14:346-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1 PMid:3251996

4. Ye J, Gao Y. Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. J Endod. 2012;38:105-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.028 PMid:22152631

5. Glossen C, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995;21:146-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3 PMid:7561658

6. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2004;37:239-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x PMid:15056350

7. Inan U, Gonulol N. Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2009;35:1396-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.014 PMid:19801238

8. Baek SH, Lee CJ, Versluis A, Kim BM, Lee W, Kim HC. Comparison of torsional stiffness of Nickel-Titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J Endod. 2011;37:1283-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.032 PMid:21846549

9. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod. 2008;34:1406-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.029 PMid:18928858

10. Gao Y, Shotton V, Wilkinson K, Phillips G, Johnson WB. Effects of raw material and rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 2010;36:1205-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.015 PMid:20630300

11. Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Peters OA. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels. J Endod. 2014;40:1477-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.025 PMid:25146037

12. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J. 2010;43:1063-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01756.x PMid:21080616

13. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod. 2010;36:1991-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.040 PMid:21092819

14. Roane JB, Sabalac CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curves canals. J Endod. 1985;11:203-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3 PMid:3858415

15. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1 PMid:5284110

16. Anderson ME, Price JW, Parashos P. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel–titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2007;33:1212-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.007 PMid:17889692

17. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:258-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.025 PMid:23321241

18. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000;26:161-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008 PMid:11199711

19. Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani G, Gergi R, Culla A, De Angelis F, et al. Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2012;38:1408-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.019 PMid:22980189

20. Martín B, Zelada G, Varela P, Bahillo JG, Magán F, Ahn S, et al. Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36:262-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00630.x PMid:12702120

21. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod. 2012;38:541-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.014 PMid:22414846

22. Karabucak B, Gatan AJ, Hsiao C, Iqbal MK. A comparison of apical transportation and length control between EndoSequence and Guidance rotary instruments. J Endod. 2010;36:123-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.015 PMid:20003949

23. De-Deus G, Leal Vieira E, Nogueira da Silva EJ, Lopes H, Elias CN, Moreira EJ. Bending resistance and dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and WaveOne large instruments. J Endod. 2014;40:575-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.013 PMid:24666915

24. Arias A, Perez-Higueras JJ, de la Macorra JC. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance at apical and coronal levels of Reciproc and WaveOne new files. J Endod. 2012;38:1244-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.022 PMid:22892743