Forghani M, Hezarjaribi M, Teimouri H. Comparison of the shaping characteristics of Neolix and Protaper Universal systems in preparation of severely-curved simulated canals. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(4):e556-9.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.53476

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.53476

 

References

1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent clin North Am. 1974;18:269-96.
PMid:4522570

 

2. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J endod. 1975;1:255-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9

PMid:10697472

 

3. Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14:346-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1

PMid:3251996

 

4. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J endod. 2004;30:559-67.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
PMid:15273636

 

5. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J endod. 2013;39:163-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005
PMid:23321225

 

6. Aminsobhani M, Meraji N, Sadri E. Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Five Nickel Titanium Rotary File Systems with Different Manufacturing Techniques. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12:636-46.

PMid:27148374 PMCid:PMC4854742

 

7. Moazzami F, Khojastepour L, Nabavizadeh M, Seied Habashi M. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Root Canal Transportation by Neoniti and Reciproc Single-File Systems. Iran Endod E. 2016;11:96-100.
PMid:27141215 PMCid:PMC4841342

 

8. Burklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schafer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod E. 2012;45:449-61.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
PMid:22188401

 

9. Pirani C, Ruggeri O, Cirulli PP, Pelliccioni GA, Gandolfi MG, Prati C. Metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments. Odontology. 2014;102:211-6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0113-6
PMid:23568014

 

10. Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014;40:852-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010
PMid:24862716

 

11. Hiran-Us S, Pimkhaokham S, Sawasdichai J, Ebihara A, Suda H. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT, ProTaper Universal and iRace files in simulated S-shaped canals. Aust Endod J. 2016;42:32-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12117
PMid:26420685

 

12. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1

PMid:5284110

 

13. Lim KC, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J. 1985;18:240-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00450.x

PMid:3865899

 

14. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod. 2012;38:505-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.040
PMid:22414838

 

15. Hoppe CB, Bottcher DE, Justo AM, So MV, Grecca FS. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions. Scanning. 2016;38:462-8.

https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21297

PMid:26750106

 

16. Bryant ST, Dummer PM, Pitoni C, Bourba M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J. 1999;32:155-64.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00256.x
PMid:10530202

 

17. Zhang L, Luo HX, Zhou XD, Tan H, Huang DM. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod. 2008;34:456-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.007
PMid:18358896

 

18. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod. 2000;26:210-6.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003
PMid:11199720

 

19. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J. 2005;38:743-52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01010.x
PMid:16164689

 

20. Camara AS, de Castro Martins R, Viana AC, de Toledo Leonardo R, Buono VT, de Azevedo Bahia MG. Flexibility and torsional strength of ProTaper and ProTaper Universal rotary instruments assessed by mechanical tests. J Endod. 2009;35:113-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.006
PMid:19084138

 

21. Gergi R, Arbab-Chirani R, Osta N, Naaman A. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2014;40:1223-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.039
PMid:25069937

 

22. Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Msd, Seung-Jong L, et al. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000;26:719-23.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
PMid:11471641

 

23. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. J Endod. 2000;26:414-7.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200007000-00009
PMid:11199768

 

24. Schafer E, Dzepina A, Danesh G. Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Oral surg oral med oral pathol oral radiol endod. 2003;96:757-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00358-5

PMid:14676769