|
1. Okada K, Rysavy S, Flores A, Linguraru
MG. Noninvasive differential diagnosis of dental periapical
lesions in cone-beam CT scans. Med Phys. 2015;42:1653-65.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4914418
PMid:25832055
|
|
|
|
2. Yoshioka T, Kikuchi
I, Adorno CG, Suda H.
Periapical bone defects of root filled teeth
with persistent lesions evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011;44:245-52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01814.x
PMid:21166825
|
|
|
|
|
3. Scarfe
WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG.
Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements, and steps
to interpretation. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:46-60.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x
PMid:22376097
|
|
|
|
|
4. Tyndall DA, Kohltfarber, H. Application of cone beam volumetric
tomography in Endodontics. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:72-81.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01654.x
PMid:22376099
|
|
|
|
|
5. Durack
C, Patel S, Davies J, Wilson R, Mannocci F.
Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and
intraoral periapical radiography for the
detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
Int Endod J. 2011;44:136-47.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01819.x
PMid:21083575
|
|
|
|
|
6. Ponder SN,
Benavides E, Kapila S, Hatchd NE. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs
high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical
radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop.
2013;143:77-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.08.023
PMid:23273363
|
|
|
|
|
7. Corbella
S, Fabbro MD, Tamse
A, Rosen E, Tsesis I. Cone beam computed
tomography for the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: a systematic
review of the literature and meta-analysis. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol.
2014;118:593-602.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.07.014
PMid:25442497
|
|
|
|
|
8. Monteiro
BM, Nobrega Filho DS,
Lopes PML, Sales MAO. Impact of Image Filters and Observations Parameters
in CBCT for Identification of Mandibular Osteolytic Lesions. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/239306
PMid:22956955 PMCid:3432359
|
|
|
|
|
9. Hassan B, Van Der Stelt P, and Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional
measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered
images for cephalometric analysis: influence of
patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:129-34.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn088
PMid:19106265
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Utumi ER, Perrella A,
Albuquerque MA, Adde CA, Rocha RG, Cavalcanti MGP. Evaluation of simulated bone lesion in the head of the mandible by
using multislice computed tomography. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:521-6.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000500030
PMid:19936536 PMCid:PMC4327684
|
|
|
|
|
11. Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos Pontual A, Frydenberg M,
Wenzel A. Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from
seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific
enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth. Clin
Oral Investig. 2008;12:217-23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0173-5
PMid:18210170
|
|
|
|
|
12. Kamburoglu K, Murat S, Pehlivan
SY. The effects of digital image enhancement on the detection of vertical
root fracture. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26:47-51.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00841.x
PMid:20089061
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Nascimento MC1, Nejaim
Y, de Almeida SM, Bóscolo FN, Haiter-Neto F, Sobrinho LC,
Silva EJ. Influence of cone beam
CT enhancement filters on diagnosis ability of longitudinal root
fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43:1-5.
PMid:24408819 PMCid:4064627
|
|
|
|
|
14. Schulze D, Blessmann M, Pohlenz P,
Wagner KW, Heiland M. Diagnostic criteria for
the detection of mandibular osteomyelitis
using cone-beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:232-5.
https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/71331738
PMid:16798917
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Ferreira LM, Visconti MAPG, Nascimento HA, Dallemolle RR, Ambrosano
GM, Freitas DQ. Influence
of CBCT enhancement filters on diagnosis of vertical root fractures: a
simulation study in endodontically treated
teeth with and without intracanal posts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140352
PMid:25666446 PMCid:4628497
|
|
|
|
|
16. Azevedo-Vaz SL, Alencar
PNB, Rovaris K, Campos PSF, Haiter-Neto
F. Enhancement cone beam computed tomography filters improve in vitro periimplant dehiscence detection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol. 2013;116:633-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.029
PMid:24018127
|
|
|
|
|
17. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola
J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and
conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:10-7.
https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/14140281
PMid:18195249
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Borg E, Gröndahl K, Persson LG, Gröndahl HG. Marginal bone level around implants assessed in
digital and film radiographs: in vivo study in the dog. Clin Implant Dent Relat
Res. 2000;2:10-7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00102.x
PMid:11359270
|
|