|
1. Özcan M, Pekkan G. Effect
of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to
composite-dentin complex. Oper Dent. 2013;38:63-72.
https://doi.org/10.2341/11-482-L
PMid:22812912
|
|
|
|
2.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci
MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio
AD, Demarco FF. A
clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year
findings. J Dent. 2006;34:427-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006
PMid:16314023
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Celik EU, Ergücü Z,
Türkün LS, Ercan
UK. Tensile bond strength of an aged resin
composite repaired with different protocols. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13:359-66.
PMid:20978641
|
|
|
|
|
4. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters
FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck
J, Huysmans MC, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all
composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27:701-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013
PMid:21571359
|
|
|
|
|
5. Cho
SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis
BA, Platt JA. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG
laser, air abrasion, and silane application
on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent. 2013;38:58-66.
https://doi.org/10.2341/11-054-L
PMid:23131133
|
|
|
|
|
6. Mobarak E, El-Deeb H.
Two-year interfacial bond durability and nanoleakage
of repaired silorane-based resin composite. Oper Dent. 2013;38:408-18.
https://doi.org/10.2341/12-061-L
PMid:23110581
|
|
|
|
|
7. Özcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, Barbosa SH, Bottino MA. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid
and nanofilled resin composites: effect of
substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1751-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0863-5
PMid:23081754
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Alizadeh Oskoee P, Mohammadi N, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Kimyai S, Pournaghi Azar F, Rikhtegaran
S, et al. Effect of surface
treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG,
Nd:YAG, and CO2 lasers on repair shear bond
strength of a silorane-based composite resin.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7:61-6.
PMid:23875082
PMCid: PMC3713862
|
|
|
|
|
9. Palasuk J, Platt JA, Cho SD, Levon
JA, Brown DT, Hovijitra ST. Effect of surface
treatments on microtensile bond strength of
repaired aged silorane resin composite. Oper Dent. 2013;38:91-9.
https://doi.org/10.2341/11-057-L
PMid:22830537
|
|
|
|
|
10. Alizadeh Oskoee P, Kimyai S, Talatahari E, Rikhtegaran S, Pournaghi-Azar
F, Sajadi Oskoee J.
Effect of mechanical surface treatment on the repair bond strength of
the silorane-based composite resin. J Dent
Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8:61-6.
PMid:25093047
PMCid:PMC4120906
|
|
|
|
|
11. Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, Rikhtegaran
S. Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on
the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28:25-30.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2598
PMid:20950189
|
|
|
|
|
12. Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Mohammadi N, Rikhtegaran
S, Bahari M, Oskoee
PA, et al. Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface
treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite
resin. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30:653-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1391-5
PMid:23873595
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Burnett LH Jr, Shinkai
RS, Eduardo Cde P. Tensile bond strength of a
one-bottle adhesive system to indirect composites treated with Er:YAG laser, air
abrasion, or fluoridric acid. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004;22:351-6.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2004.22.351
PMid:15345180
|
|
|
|
|
14. Kimyai S, Lotfipour F, Pourabbas R, Sadr A, Nikazar S, Milani M.
Effect of two prophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled
composite resin and giomer surfaces. Med Oral
Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:561-7.
https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e561
PMid:20711117
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Gordan VV, Blaser
PK, Watson RE, Mjör IA, McEdward
DL, Sensi LG, et al. A clinical evaluation of a giomer
restorative system containing surface prereacted
glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year
recall examination. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145:1036-43.
https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.57
PMid:25270702
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Tezvergil A, Lassila
LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength:
effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent.
2003;31:521-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00093-9
PMid:14554068
|
|
|
|
|
17. Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris
AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface
treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired
composites. J Esthet Restor
Dent. 2007;19:90-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00073.x
PMid:17374114
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Bollu IP, Hari A, Thumu J, Velagula LD,
Bolla N, Varri S, et al. Comparative evaluation of microleakage
between nano-ionomer, giomer
and resin modified glass ionomer cement in
class V cavities- CLSM study. Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:66-70.
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/18730.7798
PMID:27437363
PMCID: PMC4948539
|
|
|
|
|
19. Akyil MS, Yilmaz A, Karaalioğlu OF, Duymuş
ZY. Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and
a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic
surface. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28:539-45.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2586
PMid:19852588
|
|
|
|
|
20. Jain
S, Parkash H, Gupta S, Bhargava
A. To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear
bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: an
in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc.
2013;13:315-20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0270-x
PMid:24431753
PMCid:PMC3732709
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Júnior CA, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of surface
treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished
composite. Oper Dent. 2010;35:231-7.
https://doi.org/10.2341/09-216-L
PMid:20420067
|
|
|
|
|
22. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ.
Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:41-9.
PMid:15892363
|
|
|
|
|
23. Kara
HB, Ozturk AN, Aykent
F, Koc O, Ozturk B.
The effect of different surface treatments on roughness and bond
strength in low fusing ceramics. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:599-604.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9
PMid:20585967
|
|
|
|
|
24. Moezizadeh M, Ansari ZJ, Fard FM. Effect of surface treatment on micro shear
bond strength of two indirect composites. J Conserv
Dent. 2012;15:228-32.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.97943
PMid:22876007 PMCid:PMC3410330
|
|
|
|
|
25. Spyrou M, Koliniotou-Koumpia
E, Kouros P, Koulaouzidou
E, Dionysopoulos P. The reparability of
contemporary composite resins. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:353-9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137647
PMid:25202216 PMCid:PMC4144134
|
|
|
|
|
26. Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Buchalla W, Tauböck TT, Özcan M, Attin T. Repair
of silorane composite--using the same
substrate or a methacrylate-based composite? Dent Mater.
2012;28:19-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.008
PMid:22036590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|