1. Hasani Tabatabaei M, Alizade Y, Taalim S. Effect of various surface treatment on repair strength of composite resin. Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2004;1:170-86.

2. Mjor IA. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J. 1993;43:466-72. 
PMid:8138309

3. Roberson TM, Heymann H, Sturdevant CM, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2006.

4. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1998;1998:685-94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00044-4

PMid:9793291

5. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1276-82. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007
PMid:17174388

6. Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Navajas-Rodriguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:481-8. 
https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116775
PMid:11725276

7. Cavalcanti AN, Lavigne C, Fontes CM, Mathias P. Microleakage at the composite-repair interface: effect of different adhesive systems. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12:219-22. 
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572004000300011
PMid:21049256

8. Shahbazi M, Tabibi V. Enamel and dentin Preparation for different dental material. Dental Medicine University of Islamic Azad Tehran: Tehran., 1997. (Persian)

9. Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:625-33. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0426-6
PMid:20499119 PMCid:PMC3172408

10. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent. 1997;10:279-83. 
PMid:9590916

11. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:41-49. 
PMid:15892363

12. Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, Rikhtegaran S. Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28:S25-30.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2598
PMid:20950189

13. Convissar RA. Principle and practice of Laser Dentistry. St Louis Missouri: Mosby Elsevier Co; 2011.p. .181-90

14. de Souza AE, Corona SA, Dibb RG, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD. Influence of Er:YAG laser on tensile bond strength of a self- etching system and a flowable resin in different dentin depths. J Dent. 2004;32:26-275.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.12.003
PMid:15053909

15. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water- aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008;36:969-76. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014
PMid:18842330

16. Ozel BO, Eren D, Herguner SS, Akin GE. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:723-8.

PMid:21833556

17. Ozcan M, Cura C, Brendeke J. Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:451-9. 
PMid:20157647

18. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for lab-oratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89–99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2

PMid:10071465

19. Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003;31:521-525.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00093-9

PMid:14554068

20. Kukrer D, Gemalmaz D, Kuybulu EO, Bozkurt FO. A pro- spective clinical study of ceromer inlays: results up to 53 months. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:17-23.
PMid:15008227

21. Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:35-40. 
PMid:16536343

22. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the micro- tensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1276-82. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007
PMid:17174388

23. Papacchini F, Dall'Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:25-31. 
PMid:17432398

24. Mirzaei M, Yasini E, Tavakoli A, Chiniforush N. Effect of Different Power of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Treatment on Surface Morphology of Microhybride Composite Resin: Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Evaluation. J Lasers Med Sci. 2015;6:62-6.
PMid:25987970 PMCid:PMC4431965

25. Alizadeh Oskoee P, Mohammadi N, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Kimyai S, Pournaghi Azar F, Rikhtegaran S, et al. Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO2 Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2013;7:61-6.

PMid:23875082 PMCid:PMC3713862

26. İbrahim D, Çağrı U, Betül Y, Numan T. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2015;33:320-325.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3859

27. Arami S, Kimyai S, Oskoee PA, Daneshpooy M, Rikhtegaran S, Bahari M, et al. Reparability of giomer using different mechanical sur- face treatments. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e520-6.
PMid:28469816 PMCid:PMC5410671

28. Rasmussen S. Analysis of dental shear bond strength tests, shear or tensile. Int J Adhesion and Adhesives. 1996;16:147-154.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(95)00029-1

29. Della BA, Anusavice K, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2:305-313.
PMid:11317377

30. J Palasuk, JA Platt, SD Cho, JA Levon, DT Brown, ST Hovijitra. Effect of Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Repaired Aged Silorane Resin Composite. Oper Dent. 2013;38:91-9. 
https://doi.org/10.2341/11-057-L
PMid:22830537

31. Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent. 2011;36:608-17. 
https://doi.org/10.2341/10-386-L
PMid:21859313

32. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent. 1993;18:187-94.
PMid:8152988

33. Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Ritter AV, Swift EJ. Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:159-164.
PMid:16052765

34. Nassoohi N, Kazemi H, Sadaghiani M, Mansouri M, Rakhshan V. Effects of three surface conditioning techniques on repair bond strength of nanohybrid and nanofilled composites. Dent Res J. 2015;12:554-61.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.170575

PMid:26759592 PMCid:PMC4696358