Emamieh S, Hojati P, Ghasemi A, Torabzadeh H. Effect of cusp coverage and water storage on compressive strength of composite restorations of premolars. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(4):e341-5.

doi:10.4317/jced.54668

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.54668

References

1. Silverstri AR, Singh I. Treatment rationale of fractured posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978;97:806-810. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0388

2. Mc Cullock AJ, Smith BGN. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J. 1986;161:405-409. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805990

3. Steels A, Johnson RB. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J Endodon. 1999;25:6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80389-6

4. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composites resin restorations. J Esth and Rest. 2006;18:256-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00033.x PMid:16987320

5. Christensen GJ. Amalgam VS. Compoite resin: 1998. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:1757-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0148

6. Torabzadeh H, Ghassemi A, Sanei M, Razmavar S, Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM. The Influence of composite thikness with or without fibers on fracture resistance of direct restorations in endodontically treated teeth. Iran Endod. J 2014;9:215-9. PMid:25031597 PMCid:PMC4099955

7. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima SH. Effect of restoration method on fracture of resistance of endodontically treat maxillary premolars. Int J prosthodont. 2004;17:94-98. PMid:15008239

8. Linn J, Messer H. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molar. J Endood. 1994;20:479-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80043-9

9. Burk FJ. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. J Dent. 1992;20:131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90124-U

10. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blanken RJ. An in vitro study of cuspal fracture. J prosthet Dent. 1985;53:38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90061-7

11. Goel VK, Khera SC, Gurusami S, Chen RC. Effect of cavity depth on stresses in a restored tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:174-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90449-K

12. St-Georges AJ, Studevant JR, Swift ER, Thompsom JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:551-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00173-2

13. Blaser PK, Lund MR, Cochran MA, Potter RH. Effect of designs of class 2 preraretion on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent. 1983;8:6-10. PMid:6574432

14. Bell J, Smith M, Pont J. Cuspal failure of MOD restored teeth. Aust Dent J. 1982;27:283-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1982.tb05247.x PMid:6962690

15. Panahandeh N, Torabzadeh H, Ziaee N, Mahdian M, Tootiaee B, Ghasemi A. The effect of composite thickness on the stress Distribution of Restored premolar teeth with cusp reduction. J Prosthodont. 2015;21:852-63.

16. Lia Mandelli RF, Ishikiriama SK, Oliveira O, Mondelli J. Fracture resistance of weakened Teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage. J APPL oral sci. 2009;17:161-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000300006 PMCid:PMC4399525

17. Barreto BC, Van Meerbeek B, Van Ende A, Sousa SJ, Silva JR, Soares PV, et al. Biomechanical Behavior of Extensively Restored Premolars, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Resistance. J Adhes Den.t 2015;17:213-8

18. Soares CJ, Soares PV, de Freitas Santos-filho PC, Castro CG, Magalhaes D Versluis A. The Influence of Cavity Design and Glass Fiber Post on Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Premolars. J Endod. 2008;34:1015-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.017 PMid:18634938

19. Lina Chun-Li, Changb Yen-Hsiang, Liuc Perng-Ru. Multi factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration. A finite element study. J Dent. 2008;36:194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.016 PMid:18221831

20. Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composite in water–effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed mater Res. 1998;42:465-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<465::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-F

21. Llie N, Hickel R. Macro, Micro and nano-mechical investigations on silorane and methacrylate baced composite. Dent mater. 2009;25:810-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.005 PMid:19286247

22. Kildal KK, Ruyter IE. How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin-based inlay/onlay materials. Acta odontol scand. 1994;52:315-322. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359409029044

23. Drummond JL, Botsis J, Zhao D. et al .Fracture properties of aged and post-processed dental composites. Europ J oral sci. 1998;106:661-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106208.x PMid:9584913

24. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, Marquis PM, Randall RC. The influenced of short and medium term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrinkage dental composites. Dent mater. 2005;21:852-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.004 PMid:15935464

25. Aljabo A, Xia W, Liaqat S, Khan MA, Knowles JC, Ashley P, et al. Conversion, shrinkage, water sorption, flexural strength and modulus of re-mineralizing dental composites. Dent mater. 2015;31:1279-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.149 PMid:26361809

26. Soderholm KJ. Degradation of glass filler in experimental composites. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1867-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600110701 PMid:6457066

27. Ferracane JL, Berge HX. Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1418-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740071501 PMid:7560394

28. Ferracane JL, Marker VA. Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites. J Dent Res. 1992;71:13-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710010101 PMid:1531485

29. Lassila LVJ, Nohrstrom T, Vallittu PK. The influence of short–term water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fiber-resin forced composite. Int Endod J. 2001;39:16-142.

30. Alshiddi IF, Aljinbaz A. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations – An in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2016;28:49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.09.001 PMid:26792970 PMCid:PMC4688433