Benouaich V, Hitzel A, Armand S. Relevance of functional imaging in dental implantology. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(10):e1011-6.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.54816

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.54816

 

References

1. Adell R, Hansson BO, Brånemark PI, Breine U. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. II. Review of clinical approaches. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970;4:19‑34.
https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317009038440
PMid:4920517

 

2. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:55‑77.
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.4
PMid:24660190

 

3. Reddy MS, Wang IC. Radiographic determinants of implant performance. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:136‑45.
https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130010301
PMid:11276736

 

4. Greenberg AM. Cone beam computed tomography scanning and diagnosis for dental implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2015;27:185‑202.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2015.01.002
PMid:25951956

 

5. Yepes JF, Al-Sabbagh M. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in early detection of implant failure. Dent Clin North Am. 2015;59:41‑56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.09.003
PMid:25434558

 

6. Rios HF, Borgnakke WS, Benavides E. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Management of Patients Requiring Dental Implants: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review. J Periodontol. 2017;88:946‑59.
https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160548
PMid:28967330

 

7. Okada T, Kanai T, Tachikawa N, Munakata M, Kasugai S. Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2016;2:8.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-016-0042-6
PMid:27747700 PMCid:PMC5005607

 

8. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:286‑91.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x
PMid:18724856

 

9. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res. 2010;89:657‑65.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510368644
PMid:20448246

 

10. Carcuac O, Berglundh T. Composition of human peri-implantitis and periodontitis lesions. J Dent Res. 2014;93:1083‑8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514551754
PMid:25261052 PMCid:PMC4293768

 

11. van Velzen FJJ, Ofec R, Schulten EAJM, Ten Bruggenkate CM. 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:1121‑8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12499
PMid:25370914

 

12. Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Lagerweij MCM, Arkies H, de Boer J, Oostdijk AHJ, et al. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions. J Nucl Med Technol. 2015;43:21‑7.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.114.147215
PMid:25613334

 

13. Rogasch JM, Hofheinz F, Lougovski A, Furth C, Ruf J, Großer OS, et al. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction. EJNMMI Phys. 2014;1:12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-7364-1-12
PMid:26501454

 

14. Deman P, Atwal P, Duzenli C, Thakur Y, Ford NL. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:3201‑22.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/59/12/3201
PMid:24862349

 

15. Benic GI, Elmasry M, Hämmerle CHF. Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:86‑96.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12616
PMid:26010421

 

16. Bockisch A, Beyer T, Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Kühl H, Debatin JF, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography--imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls. Mol Imaging Biol MIB Off Publ Acad Mol Imaging. 2004;6:188‑99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mibio.2004.04.006
PMid:15262234

 

17. van der Vos CS, Arens AIJ, Hamill JJ, Hofmann C, Panin VY, Meeuwis APW, et al. Metal Artifact Reduction of CT Scans to Improve PET/CT. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2017;58:1867‑72.

 

18. Rakic M, Galindo-Moreno P, Monje A, Radovanovic S, Wang H-L, Cochran D, et al. How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;epub.

 

19. Schwarz F, Schmucker A, Becker J. Efficacy of alternative or adjunctive measures to conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2015;1:22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0023-1
PMid:27747644 PMCid:PMC5005629

 

20. Marconcini S, Genovesi AM, Marchisio O, Gelpi F, Barone A, Corega C, et al. In vivo study of titanium healing screws surface modifications after different debridment procedure. Minerva Stomatol. 2014;epub.

 

21. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Popovski K, Hartig B, Becker J. Influence of different air-abrasive powders on cell viability at biologically contaminated titanium dental implants surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:83‑91.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31154
PMid:18615487

 

22. Persson GR, Roos-Jansåker A-M, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Microbiologic results after non-surgical erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet laser or air-abrasive treatment of peri-implantitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2011;82:1267‑78.
https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.100660
PMid:21417591

 

23. Mussano F, Rovasio S, Schierano G, Baldi I, Carossa S. The effect of glycine-powder airflow and hand instrumentation on peri-implant soft tissues: a split-mouth pilot study. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:42‑4.
https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3063
PMid:23342332

 

24. Froum SJ, Froum SH, Rosen PS. A Regenerative Approach to the Successful Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Consecutive Series of 170 Implants in 100 Patients with 2- to 10-Year Follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35:857‑63.
https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2571
PMid:26509990