Ruiz-Sánchez C, Faus-Matoses V, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses I, Faus-Llácer VJ. An in vitro cyclic fatigue resistance comparison of conventional and new generation nickel-titanium rotary files. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(8):e805-9.

doi:10.4317/jced.55091

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.55091

References

1. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006;32:1031–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.008 PMid:17055902

2. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH.. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005;31:845–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000164127.62864.7c PMid:16306815

3. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000;26:161–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008 PMid:11199711

4. Shen Y, Coil JM, McLean AGR, Hemerling DL, Haapasalo M. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices. J Endod. 2009;35:1363–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.004 PMid:19801231

5. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod. 2006;32:61–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.017 PMid:16410072

6. Haïkel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1999;25:434-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80274-X

7. Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, Vincenzi V, Giansiracusa A, Grande NM, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Endod. 2011;37:1293–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.023 PMid:21846552

8. Larsen CM, Watanabe I, Glickman GN, He J. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:401–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.010 PMid:19249604

9. Gutmann JL, Gao Y. Alteration in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel-titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused review. Int Endod J. 2012;45:113–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01957.x PMid:21902705

10. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod. 2008;34:1406–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.029 PMid:18928858

11. Shen Y, Zhou H, Zheng Y, Peng B. Current Challenges and Concepts of the Thermomechanical Treatment of Nickel-Titanium Instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:163–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005 PMid:23321225

12. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, Clark WA, Kovarik L, Buie C, et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:1589–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.004 PMid:19840654

13. Ye J, Gao Y. Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. J Endod. 2012;38:105–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.028 PMid:22152631

14. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod. 2012;38:398–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.004 PMid:22341083

15. Gao Y, Shotton V, Wilkinson K, Phillips G, Ben W. Effects of Raw Material and Rotational Speed on the Cyclic Fatigue of ProFile Vortex Rotary Instruments. J Endod. 2010;36:1205–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.015 PMid:20630300

16. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cotti E, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Blue Treatment Enhances Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Vortex Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files. J Endod. 2014;40:1451–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.020 PMid:25146031

17. Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Peters OA. Differences in Cyclic Fatigue Resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal Instruments at Different Levels. J Endod. 2014;40:1477–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.025 PMid:25146037

18. Anderson ME, Price JW, Parashos P. Fracture Resistance of Electropolished Rotary Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments. J Endod. 2007;33:1212–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.007 PMid:17889692

19. Rapisarda E, Bonaccorso A, Tripi TR, Condorelli GG, Torrisi L. Wear of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments evaluated by scanning electron microscopy: effect of ion implantation. J Endod. 2001;27:588–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200109000-00009 PMid:11556565

20. Li U, Iijima M, Endo K, Brantley WA, Alapati SB, Lin CP. Application of Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation for Surface Modification of Nickel- titanium Rotary Instruments. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:467–73. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.467 PMid:17886448

21. Nguyen HH, Fong H, Paranjpe A, Flake NM, Johnson JD, Peters OA. Evaluation of the resistance to cyclic fatigue among protaper next, ProTaper universal, and vortex blue rotary instruments. J Endod. 2014;40:1190–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.033 PMid:25069931

22. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997;23:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6

23. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:1469–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.015 PMid:19840633

24. Castelló-Escrivá R, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses V, Román-Richon S, Faus-Llácer VJ. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files. J Endod. 2012;38:1521–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.010 PMid:23063228

25.Montenegro-Santillán R, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses V, Faus-Llácer V. An in vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper universal and GT series X files. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e533–6. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18595 PMid:23385505 PMCid:PMC3668885

26. Kim HC, Cheung GS, Lee CJ, Kim BM, Park JK, Kang SI. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a threedimensional finite-element analysis. J Endod. 2008;34:743–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.015 PMid:18498904

27. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L. Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure. J Endod. 2001;27:516–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200108000-00005 PMid:11501589

28. Kim HC, Yum J, Hur B, Cheung GS. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2010;36:147–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.037 PMid:20003955

29. Gavini G, Pessoa OF, Barletta FB, Vasconcellos MA, Caldeira CL. Cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary nickel-titanium instruments submitted to nitrogen ion implantation. J Endod. 2010;36:1183–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.032 PMid:20630295

30. Oh SR, Chang SW, Lee Y, Gu Y, Son WJ, Lee W, et al. A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:622–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.025 PMid:20303058

31. Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC. Cyclic fatigue resistance of K3, K3XF, and twisted file nickel-titanium files under continuous rotation or reciprocating motion. J Endod. 2013;39:1585–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.020 PMid:24238452

32. Lopes HP, Ferreira AA, Elias CN, Moreira EJ, de Oliveira JC, Siqueira JF Jr. Influence of rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:1013–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.003 PMid:19567325

33. Al-Sudani D, Grande NM, Plotino G, Pompa G, Di Carlo S, Testarelli L, et al. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature. J Endod. 2012;38:987–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.025 PMid:22703666