Armas-Vega A,
Casanova-Obando P, Taboada-Alvear MF, Aldas-Ramírez JE, Montero-Oleas N,
Viteri-García A. Effect of mouthwashes on the integrity of composite resin and
resin modified glass ionomer: In vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent.
2019;11(2):e179-84.
doi:10.4317/jced.55102
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55102
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
|
1. Akalin T, Genc G, Korkmaz
Ceyhan Y, Ozturk Bozkur F. The effect of mouth rinses on the color stability
of sonicfill and a nanohybrid composite. J Instanb Univ Fac Dent. 2016;50:17-23. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Leal JP, da Silva JD, Leal RFM, Oliveira-Júnior CDC, Prado VLG, Vale GC. Effect of Mouthwashes on Solubility and Sorption of
Restorative Composites. Int
J Dent. 2017;5865691:1-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Terry DA. Direct
applications of a nanocomposite resin system: Part 1--The evolution of
contemporary composite materials. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004;16:417-22. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Nantanee R, Busayara S,
Chutima T, Hidenori H, Junji T. Silver diamine fluoride and glass ionomer
differentially remineralize early caries lesions, in situ. Clin Oral
Investig. 2016;20:1151-57. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Agarwal PM, Taneja S,
Kumar M. To evaluate and compare the effect of different light-curing modes
and different liners on cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored with
bulk filled or incrementally filled composite measured at different time
intervals. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20:317-321. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Agha A, Parker S, Patel
MP. The properties of experimental resin-modified glass-ionomer luting
cements (RMGICs) containing novel monomers. Dent Mater. 2017;33:1331-39. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Naasan MA, Watson TF.
Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for
the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1998;11:36-45. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Brandt WC, de Moraes RR,
Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Consansi S. Effect of different
photo-activation methods on push out force, hardness and cross-link density
of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2008;24:846-50. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Da Silva EM, Almeida GS, Poskus LT, Guimãraes JG. Relationship between the degree of conversion, solubility and salivary
sorption of a hybrid and a nanofilled resin composite. J Appl Oral Sci.
2008;16:161-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Baig AR, Shori DD,
Shenoi PR, Ali SN, Shetti S, Godhane A. Mouth rinses affect color stability
of composite. J
Conserv Dent. 2016;19:355-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Schwantz JK, Oliveira-Ogliari A, Meereis CT, Leal FB, Ogliari FA, Moraes RR. Characterization of Bis-Acryl Composite Resins for
Provisional Restorations. Braz Dent J. 2017;28:354-361. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Trauth KG, Godoi AP, Colucci V, Corona SA, Catirse AB. The influence of mouthrinses and simulated tooth
brushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin. Braz Oral Res.
2012;26:209-14. |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Falkensammer F, Arnetzl
GV, Wildburger A, Freudenthaler J. Color stability of different composite resin
materials. J
Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:378-83. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Miranda Dde A, Bertoldo CE, Aguiar FH, Lima DA, Lovadino JR. Effects of mouthwashes on Knoop hardeness and
surface roughness of dental composites after different immersion times. Braz Oral Res.
2011;25:168-73. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Fugolin APP, Pfeifer CS.
New Resins for Dental Composites. J Dent Res. 2017;96:1085-91. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Jyothi K, Crasta S,
Venugopal P. Effect of five commercial mouth rinses on the microhardness of a
nanofilled resin composite restorative material: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent.
2012;15:214-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
17. Byeon SM, Lee MH, Bae
TS. The effect of different fluoride application methods on the
remineralization of initial carious lesions. Restor Dent Endod. 2016;41:121-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Gavranović-Glamoč A,
Ajanović M, Korać S, Zukić S, Strujić-Porović S, Kamber-Ćesir A, Kazazić L,
Berhamović E. Evaluation of the water sorption of luting cements in different
solutions. Acta
Med Acad. 2017;46:124-32. |
|
|
|
|
|
19. Kharma K, Zogheib T,
Bhandi S, Mehanna C. Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass
Ionomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract.
2018;19:226-32. |
|
|
|
|
|
20. Hotwani K, Thosar N,
Baliga S. Comparative in vitro assessment of color stability of hybrid
esthetic restorative materials against various children's beverages. J Conserv Dent.
2014;17:70-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
21. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW.
A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J Funct Biomater.
2016;7:1-15. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Da Silva RC, Zuanon AC. Surface
roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumaticrestorative
treatment (ART). Braz
Dent J. 2006;17:106-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Ferraz Caneppele TM, Rocha DM, Màximo Araujo MA, Valera MC, Salazar Marocho
SM. Abrasion resistance of direct and indirect resins as
a function of a sealant veneer. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25:381-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
24. Wang J, Schlagenhauf L,
Setyan A. Transformation of the released asbestos, carbon fibers and carbon
nanotubes from composite materials and the changes of their potential health
impacts. J
Nanobiotechnology. 2017;15:15. |
|
|
|
|
|
25. Mufti AS. Clinical
efficacy of the conventional glass ionomer cement and resin modified glass
ionomer cement in primary molars. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26:587-90. |
|
|
|
|
|
26. Arola D. Fatigue testing
of biomaterials and their interfaces. Dent Mater. 2017;33:367-81. |
|