1. Martin CB, Chalmers EV, McIntyre GT, Cochrane H, Mossey PA. Orthodontic scanners: what is available? J Orthod. 2015;42:136-43.
https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000001
PMid:25939980

2. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluation with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:1-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.019
PMid:19577140

3. Benninger B, Peterson A, Cook V. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:302-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.014
PMid:21684648

4. Yang YQ, Mi ZL, Ge ZL. Comparison between the tooth length measured by cone-beam CT and the tooth length measured with Vernier calliper. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013;48:689-93.
PMid:24513076

5. Flores-Mir C, Rosenblatt MR, Major PW, Carey JP, Heo G. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs. J Orthod. 2014;19:45-53.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar

6. Choi SH, Kim JS, Kim CS, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Cone-beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-crown ratios of the maxillary and mandibular incisors in a Koran population. Korean J Orthod. 2017;47:39-49.
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.1.39
PMid:28127538 PMCid:PMC5266124

7. Halazonetis DJ. Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141:403, 405, 407.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.010
PMid:22464521

8. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1992;14:239-56.
https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791

9. Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-M

10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

11. Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:201-8.
https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140282
PMid:25358833 PMCid:PMC4277443

12. Lagravere MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three dimensional accuracy of measurement made with software of cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:112-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024
PMid:18617110

13. Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using little's index. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:345-9.
https://doi.org/10.2319/083109-491.1
PMid:20050733

14. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:S100-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.040
PMid:20381750

15. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:466-73.
https://doi.org/10.2319/072909-427.1
PMid:20050738

16. Kim SY, Lim SH, Gang SN, Kim HJ. Crown and root lengths of incisors, canines, and premolars measured by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with malocclusions. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43:271-8.
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.6.271
PMid:24396736 PMCid:PMC3879283

17. Bailey E, Nelson G, Miller AJ, Andrews L, Johnson E. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: a new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143:574-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.022
PMid:23561420