Boruziniat A, Khaki H, Majidinia S. Retrospective evaluation of the clinical performance of direct composite restorations using the snow-plow technique: Up to 4 years follow-up. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(11):e964-8.

doi:10.4317/jced.55639

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References

1. Araujo Fde O, Vieira LC, Monteiro Junior S. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations. Oper Dent. 2006;31:556-61. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-94 PMid:17024943

2. Ehrnford L, Dérand T. Cervical gap formation in class II composite resin restorations. Swed Dent J. 1984;8:15-9.
PMid:6372145

3. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:95-110. PMid:7568728

4. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Joosten M, Veeke Ov. Porosities and voids in Class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite. Dent Mater. 2002;18:58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00020-3 PMid:11740965

5. Fusayama T. Indications for self-cured and light-cured adhesive composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90048-F PMid:1548607

6. Aboushala A, Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996;21:67-70. PMid:9161210

7.Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2004;29:713-9. PMid:15646229

8. Aggarwal V SM, Yadav S, Yadav H. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. J Dent. 2014;42:619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.016 PMid:24631232

9. Attar N, Turgut MD, Güngör HC. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. Oper Dent. 2004;29:162-7. PMid:15088727

10. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3:208-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050103 PMid:10803136

11. Moazzami SM, Sarabi N, Hajizadeh H, Majidinia S, Li Y, Meharry MR, Shahrokh H. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2014;39:256-6. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-495-L PMid:24151926

12. Li XR, Wang J, Li HW. Clinical evaluation of flowable composites in treatment of wedge-shaped defects as a liner. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2011;20:429-32. PMid:21909614

13. Curtis PM Jr, von Fraunhofer JA, Farman AG. The radiographic density of composite restorative resins. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;70:226-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90124-B PMid:2290654

14. Boruziniat A, Gharaee S, Sarraf Shirazi A, Majidinia S, Vatanpour M. Evaluation of the efficacy of flowable composite as lining material on microleakage of composite resin restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2016;47:93-101. PMid:26665259

15. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, de Boer T, Pesschier D, Bronkhorst E. Voids and porosities in class I micropreparations filled with various resin composites. Oper Dent. 2003;28:9-14. PMid:12540112

16. Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:155-62. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00020.x PMid:12648268

17. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:469-7. PMid:18297828

18. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. Oper Dent. 2002;27:569-75. PMid:12413221

19. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:775-83. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265 PMid:17545266

20. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:763-72. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0264 PMid:17545265

21. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:71-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0201-z PMid:12740693

22. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, Loguércio AD, Moraes RR, Bronkhorst EM, et al. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater. 2011;27:955-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.06.001 PMid:21762980

23. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 2010;89:1063-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376071 PMid:20660797

24. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent. 2006;34:427-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006 PMid:16314023