Gómez-Gómez SL, Villarraga-Ossa JA, Diosa-Peña JG, Ortiz-Restrepo JF, Castrillón-Marín RA, Ardila CM. Comparison of frictional resistance between passive self-ligating brackets and slide-type low-friction ligature brackets during the alignment and leveling stage. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(7):e593-600.

doi:10.4317/jced.55913

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References

1. Vinay K, Venkatesh MJ, Nayak RS, Pasha A, Rajesh M, Kumar P. A comparative study to evaluate the effects of ligation methods on friction in sliding mechanics using 0.022" slot brackets in dry state: An In-vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6:76-83.

2. Kumar S, Singh S, Hamsa PRR, Ahmed S, Prasanthma, Bhatnagar A, et al. Evaluation of friction in orthodontics using various brackets and archwire combinations-an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:ZC33-36.

3.Cordasco G, Lo Giudice A, Militi A, Nucera R, Triolo G, Matarese G. In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding in self-ligating and conventional bracket systems during dental alignment. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42:218-224. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.4.218 PMid:23112953 PMCid:PMC3481988

4. Stefanos S, Secchi AG, Coby G, Tanna N, Mante FK. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:463-467 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.029 PMid:20889052

5. Gómez-Gómez SL, Sánchez-Obando N, Álvarez-Castrillón MA, Montoya-Goez, Ardila CM. Comparison of frictional forces during the closure of extraction spaces in passive self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets using the finite element method. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11:e439-446. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55739

6. Monteiro MRG, da Silva LE, Elias CN, Vilella ODV. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22:228-234. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130665 PMid:25025564 PMCid:PMC4072274

7. Fortini A, Lupoli M, Cacciafesta V. A new low-friction ligation system. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:464-470.

8. Rajesh D, Sainath MC, Chandradas G. Comparison of friction among low-friction ligation, conventional ligation and self ligation with conventional stainless steel and esthetic brackets - an in vitro study. Indian J Dent. 2014;5:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijd.2014.02.002

9. Rudolph DJ, Willes PMG, Sameshima GT. A finite element model of apical force distribution from orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:127-131.

10. Gravina MA, Helena I, Portella V, Fraga MR, Artese F. Clinical evaluation of dental alignment and leveling with three different types of orthodontic wires. Dent Press J Orthod. 2013;18:31-37. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000600006

11. Shroff B, Lindauer SJ. Leveling and aligning: Challenges and solutions. Semin Orthod. 2001;7:16-25. https://doi.org/10.1053/sodo.2001.21054

12.Chimenti C, Franchi L, Giuseppe M Di, Lucci M. Friction of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:421-425.

13. Franchi L, Baccetti T. Forces released during alignment with a preadjusted appliance with different types of elastomeric ligatures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:687-690 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.028 PMid:16679210

14. Uhlir R, Mayo V, Lin PH, Chen S, Lee YT, Hershey G, et al. Biomechanical characterization of the periodontal ligament: Orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:183-192 https://doi.org/10.2319/092615-651.1 PMid:27542105 PMCid:PMC5812953

15. Kumar D, Dua V, Mangla R, Solanki R, Solanki M, Sharma R. Frictional force released during sliding mechanics in nonconventional elastomerics and self-ligation: An in vitro comparative study. Indian J Dent. 2016;7:60-65. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.184652 PMid:27433047 PMCid:PMC4934089

16. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulations in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:361-370 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.116090 PMid:11606960

17. Knop L, Gandini Jr. LG, Shintcovsk RL, Gandini MREAS. Scientific use of the finite element method in Orthodontics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20:119-125. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.119-125.sar PMid:25992996 PMCid:PMC4445234

18. Gómez S, Montoya Y, Garcia N, Virgen A, Botero J. Comparison of frictional resistance among conventional, active and passive self-ligating brackets with different combinations of arch wires: a finite elements study. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2016;29:130-136

19. Choi S, Hwang EY, Park HK, Park YG. Correlation between frictional force and surface roughness of orthodontic archwires. Scanning. 2015;37: 399-405 https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21225 PMid:26018223

20. Pillai AR, Gangadharan A, Kumar S, Shah A. Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2014;6(Suppl 1):S150-155 https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.137429 PMid:25210359 PMCid:PMC4157255

21. Papageorgiou SN, Keilig L, Hasan I, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:300-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv050 PMid:26174769 PMCid:PMC4914907

22. Babu KP, Keerthi VN, Madathody D, Prasanna AL, Gopinath V, Kumar MS. Evaluating the surface characteristics of stainless steel, TMA, Timolium, and Titanium-niobium wires: An in vivo scanning electron microscope study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17:372-376. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1857 PMid:27443362

23. Hemanth M, Shilpi, Raghuveer HP, Rani MS, Hegde C, Vedavathi B. Stress induced in the periodontal ligament under orthodontic loading (Part I): A finite element method study using linear analysis. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:129-133.

24. Cattaneo P, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Strains in periodontal ligament and alveolar bone associated with orthodontic tooth movement analyzed by finite element. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009;12:120-128 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01445.x PMid:19419455

25. Reddy VB, Kumar TA, Prasad M, Nuvvula S, Patil RG, Reddy PK. A comparative in-vivo evaluation of the alignment efficiency of 5 ligation methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:23-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126236 PMid:24966742 PMCid:PMC4054028

26. Krishnan M, Seema S, Kumar AV, Varthini NP, Sukumaran K, Pawar VR, Corrosion resistance of surface modified nickel titanium archwires. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:358-367 https://doi.org/10.2319/021813-140.1 PMid:24004028

27. Sarul M, Rutkowska-Gorczyca M, Detyna J, Zięty A, Kawala M, Antoszewska-Smith J. Do Mechanical and Physicochemical Properties of Orthodontic NiTi Wires Remain Stable In Vivo? Biomed Res Int. 2016;52686629 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5268629 PMid:28097137 PMCid:PMC5206860

28. Pulikkottil VJ, Chidambaram S, Bejoy PU, Femin PK, Paul P, Rishad M. Corrosion resistance of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, titanium molybdenum alloy, and ion-implanted titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in acidic fluoride-containing artificial saliva: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8:S96-S99

29. Mendes B, Ferreira R, Pithon M, Horta M, Oliveira D. Physical and chemical properties of orthodontic brackets after 12 and 24 months: in situ study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22:194-203. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130528 PMid:25025560 PMCid:PMC4072270

30. Condò R, Casaglia A, Armellin E, Condò SG, Cerroni L. Traditional elastic ligatures versus slide ligation system. A morphological evaluation. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013;6:15-24. https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2013.6.1.015