de Medeiros RA, dos Santos DM, Pesqueira AA, Campaner M, Bitencourt SB, da Silva EVF, Goiato MC. Stress distribution in fixed mandibular prostheses fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional techniques: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(9):e807-13.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.56067

http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56067

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

References

1. Pera P, Bassi FSchierano GAppendino PPreti G. Implant anchored complete mandibular denture: evaluation of masticatory efficiency, oral function and degree of satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:462-467.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00260.x
PMid:9687120

 

2. Friedman N, Landesman HM, Wexler M. The influences of fear, anxiety, and depression on the patient's adaptive responses to complete dentures. Part I. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:687-689.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90419-7

 

3. Burns DR. The mandibular complete overdenture. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:603-623.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.03.002
PMid:15261796

 

4. Gallucci GO, Doughtie CBHwang JWFiorellini JPWeber HP. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:601-607.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01699.x
PMid:19302389

 

5. Emami E, Heydecke GRompré PHde Grandmont PFeine JS. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:533-544.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01693.x
PMid:19515032

 

6. Alhashim A, Kamel M, Brackett WW. Four-year follow-up of the rehabilitation of a mandibular arch with a cementable zirconia-reinforced fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108:138-142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)00120-5

 

7. Abduo J, Lyons K. Rationale for the use of CAD/CAM technology in implant prosthodontics. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:768121.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/768121
PMid:23690778 PMCid:PMC3652193

 

8. Drago C, Gurney L. Maintenance of implant hybrid prostheses: clinical and laboratory procedures. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:28-35.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00899.x
PMid:22938189

 

9. Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern RYates DMIzutani NEnkling N, et al. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconium dioxide bars. Dent Mater. 2013;29:945-953.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.004
PMid:23890960

 

10. Cehreli MC, Iplikcioglu H, Bilir OG. The influence of the location of load transfer on strains around implants supporting four unit cement-retained fixed prostheses: in vitro evaluation of axial versus off-set loading. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:394-400.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00867.x
PMid:11966975

 

11. Bornstein MM, Halbritter SHarnisch HWeber HPBuser D. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: indications, surgical procedures, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:1109-1116.

 

12. Goiato MC, Pesqueira AAFalcón-Antenucci RMDos Santos DMHaddad MF, et al. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:283-288.
https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.672823
PMid:22486241

 

13. Ribeiro PP, Goiato MCPellizzer EPPesqueira AAHaddad MF, et al. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:797-800.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820f3473
PMid:21558947

 

14. Zaparolli D, Peixoto RFPupim DMacedo APToniollo MBMattos MDGC, et al. Photoelastic analysis of mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures made with different bar materials and manufacturing techniques. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017; 81:144-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.052
PMid:28887958

 

15. Elsyad MA, Al-Mahdy YF, Salloum MGElsaih EA. The effect of cantilevered bar length on strain around two implants supporting a mandibular overdenture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:143-150.
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2467
PMid:23748333

 

16. Bhering CL, Mesquita MFKemmoku DTNoritomi PYConsani RL, et al. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;69:715-725.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.059
PMid:27612765

 

17. Ferreira MB, Barão VAFaverani LPHipólito ACAssunção WG. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;35:92-99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.10.022
PMid:24411356

 

18. Meric G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, et al. Influence of prosthesis type and material on the stress distribution in bone around implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent Sci. 2011:25-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2011.02.005

 

19. Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:571-582.

 

20. Santiago Junior JF, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, de Carvalho PS. Stress analysis in bone tissue around single implants with different diameters and veneering materials: a 3-D finite element study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33:4700-4714.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.027
PMid:24094178

 

21. Ventura J, Jimenez-Castellanos E, Romero J, Enrile F. Tooth Fractures in Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Acrylic Resin Prostheses: A Retrospective Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:161-165.
https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4400
PMid:26929956

 

22. Koenig V, Vanheusden AJ, Le Goff SO, Mainjot AK. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study. J Dent. 2013;41:1164-1174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.009
PMid:24135294

 

23. Paniz G, Stellini EMeneghello RCerardi AGobbato EABressan E. The precision of fit of cast and milled full-arch implant-supported restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:687-693.
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2990
PMid:23748298

 

24. Ahlholm P, Sipilä KVallittu PJakonen MKotiranta U. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:35-41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527
PMid:27483210

 

25. Vizcaya RF. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:501-508.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12528
PMid:27570943