1. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 2. Modes of failure and influence of various clinical characteristics. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:177-82.

PMid:12737251

 

2. Pelaez J, Cogolludo PG, Serrano B, Lozano JF, Suarez MJ. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:373-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60094-8

PMid:22633593

 

3. Loi I, Di Felice A. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8:10-23.

PMid:23390618

 

4. Agustin-Panadero R, Serra-Pastor B, Fons-Font A, Sola-Ruiz MF. Prospective Clinical Study of Zirconia Full-coverage Restorations on Teeth Prepared With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Gingival Health: Results After Two-year Follow-up. Oper Dent. 2018;43:482-7.
https://doi.org/10.2341/17-124-C
PMid:29513640

 

5. Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:282-7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12410
PMid:26618259

 

6. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31 Spec No 4:2-11; quiz 2.

PMid:21049823

 

7. Joda T, Bragger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:e185-e9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12600
PMid:25864771

 

8. Luthardt RG, Walter MH, Weber A, Koch R, Rudolph H. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:322-7.

PMid:18717091

 

9. Muhlemann S, Kraus RD, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:184-95.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13300
PMid:30306680

 

10. Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:92.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4
PMid:28577366 PMCid:PMC5455075

 

11. Agustin-Panadero R, Loi I, Fernandez-Estevan L, Chust C, Rech-Ortega C, Perez-Barquero JA. Digital protocol for creating a virtual gingiva adjacent to teeth with subgingival dental preparations. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64:506-514.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.10.006
PMid:31787577

 

12. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:749-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
PMid:26803173

 

13. Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:124.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0
PMid:28927393 PMCid:PMC5606018

 

14. Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flugge T, Fokas G, Tahmaseb A, Bechelli D, et al. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:436-42.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13309
PMid:30328201

 

15. Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Nash J, Bocklet C, Lauer Kelly A, Bacro T, et al. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:369-377.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12485

PMID:31058428