Ghazal-Maghras R, Vilaplana-Vivo J, Camacho-Alonso F, Martínez-Beneyto Y. Properties of polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) implant abutments: A systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(4):e349-58.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.59466

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59466

___________

 

References

1. Brånemark P, Hansson B, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1977;11:1-32.

PMid:356184

 

2. Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:5426-45.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15045426
PMid:24686515 PMCid:PMC4013573

 

3. Wiesli MG, Ozcan M. High-Performance Polymers and Their Potential Application as Medical and Oral Implant Materials: A Review. Implant Dent. 2015;24:448-57.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000285
PMid:26035377

 

4. Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:32-47.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x
PMid:19663947

 

5. Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The use of a modified polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses. A clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:580-4.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12325
PMid:26216668

 

6. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketoneda suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:1209-16.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32932
PMid:23564476

 

7. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:12-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001
PMid:26520679

 

8. Silthamitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:668-74.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-349
PMid:27477234

 

9. Altmeyer J, Dos Santos JF, Amancio-Filho ST. Effect of the friction riveting process parameters on the joint formation and performance of Ti alloy/short-fibre reinforced polyether ether ketone joints. Mater Design. 2014;60:164-176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.042

 

10. Green S, Schlegel J. A polyaryletherketone biomaterial for use in medical implant applications. Polym for the Med Ind Pro. 2001;14-5.

 

11. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
PMid:17686513 PMCid:PMC2040108

 

12. Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller W. Flexural behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1377-84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.151
PMid:26361808

 

13. Schwitalla AD, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller W. Fatigue limits of different PEEK materials for dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;69:163-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.12.019
PMid:28081481

 

14. Panayotov IV, Orti V, Cuisinier F, Yachouh J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27:118.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5731-4
PMid:27259708

 

15. Lee W, Koak J, Lim Y, Kim S, Kwon H, Kim M. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of polyetheretherketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1044-52.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32669
PMid:22331553

 

16. Rompen E, Domken O, Degidi M,Pontes AE, Piattelli A. The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on sof t tissue integration: A literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:55-67.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01367.x
PMid:16968382

 

17. Canullo L, Annunziata M, Pesce P, Tommasato G, Nastri L, Guida L. Influence of abutment material and modifications on peri-implant soft-tissue attachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of histological animal studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:426-436.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.025
PMid:32197823

 

18. Alp G, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Optical properties and surface roughness of prepolymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:347-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.001
PMid:30143239

 

19. D'Ercole S, Cellini L, Pilato S, Di Lodovico S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Petrini M. Material characterization and Streptococcus oralis adhesion on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium surfaces used in implantology. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31:84.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06408-3
PMid:32989624 PMCid:PMC7522102

 

20. Gittens RA, Scheideler L, Rupp F, Hyzy SL, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Schwartz Z, et al. A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2907-2918.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.032
PMid:24709541 PMCid:PMC4103435

 

21. Sartoretto SC, Alves ATNN, Resende RFB, Calasans-Maia J, Granjeiro JM, Calasans-Maia MD. Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants. J. Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23:279-297.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140483
PMid:26221922 PMCid:PMC4510662

 

22. Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;108:3363-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037
PMid:24721613 PMCid:PMC4103432

 

23. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
PMid:17686513 PMCid:PMC2040108

 

24. Gheisarifar M, Thompson GA, Drago C, Tabatabaei F, Rasoulianboroujeni M. In vitro study of surface alterations to polyetheretherketone and titanium and their effect upon human gingival fibroblasts. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:155-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.012
PMid:32081352

 

25. Yuan B, Cheng QW, Zhao R, Zhu XD, Yang X, Yang X, et al. Comparison of osteointegration property between PEKK and PEEK: effects of surface structure and chemistry. Biomaterials. 2018;170:116-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.014
PMid:29660634

 

26. Qin W, Li Y, Ma J, Liang Q, Cui X, Jia H, Tang B. Osseointegration and biosafety of graphene oxide wrapped porous CF/PEEK composites as implantable materials: The role of surface structure and chemistry. Dent Mater. 2020;36:1289-1302.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.06.004
PMid:32651018

 

27. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264-269.
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
PMid:19622511

 

28. Faggion CM Jr. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12:182-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001
PMid:23177493

 

29. Tretto PHW, Dos Santos MBF, Spazzin AO, Pereira GKR, Bacchi A. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020;23:372-383.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1731481
PMid:32116034

 

30. Al-Zordk W, Elmisery A, Ghazy M. Hybrid-abutment-restoration: effect of material type on torque maintenance and fracture resistance after thermal aging. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00220-y
PMid:32578068 PMCid:PMC7311558

 

31. Ortega-Martínez J, Delgado LM, Ortiz-Hernández M, Punset M, Cano-Batalla J, Cayon MR, et al. In vitro assessment of PEEK and titanium implant abutments: Screw loosening and microleakage evaluations under dynamic mechanical testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:470-476.

PMid:33309211

 

32. Ragupathi M, Mahadevan V, Azhagarasan NS, Ramakrishnan H, Jayakrishnakumar S. Comparative evaluation of the wear resistance of two different implant abutment materials after cyclic loading - An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2020;11:229-236.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_294_19
PMid:33776348 PMCid:PMC7989763

 

33. Atsü SS, Aksan ME, Bulut AC. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and CeramicReinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:622-630
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7036
PMid:30716141

 

34. Al-Rabab'ah M, Hamadneh W, Alsalem I, Khraisat A, Abu Karaky A. Use of High-Performance Polymers as Dental Implant Abutment and Frameworks: A Case Series Report. J Prosthodont. 2019;4:365-372.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12639
PMid:28513977

 

35. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Traini T, Di Lorio D, Caputi S. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw-versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis. Dent Mater. 2007;23:296-301
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.013
PMid:16564081

 

36. Freitas ACJ, Bonfante EA, Rocha EP, Silva NRF, Marotta LPC. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119:323-330
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00837.x
PMid:21726295

 

37. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: a methodologic clinical study. Int J. Proshodont. 2002;15:20-27.

PMid:11887595

 

38. Li Xu, Zhu Z, Li Z, Zhou J, Chen W. All-ceramic premolar guiding late retains resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Stomatol. 2019;37:285-9.

PMid:31218863 PMCid:PMC7030086

 

39. Wachtel A, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Beuer F, Müller W, Schwitalla AD. A novel approach to prove bacterial leakage of implant-abutment connections in vitro. J Oral Implantol. 2016;42:452-7.
https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00065
PMid:27327361

 

40. Park J, Baek C, Heo S, Kim S, Koak J, Kim S, et al. An in vitro evaluation of the loosening of different interchangeable abutments in internal-connection type implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:350-5.
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5295
PMid:28291853