González-Mancilla S, Montero-Miralles P, Saúco-Márquez JJ, Areal-Quecuty V, Cabanillas-Balsera D, Segura-Egea JJ. Prevalence of Dens Invaginatus assessed by CBCT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(11):e959-66.

doi:10.4317/jced.59849

___________

References

1. Jiménez-Rubio A, Segura JJ, Jiménez-Planas A, Llamas R. Multiple dens invaginatus affecting maxillary lateral incisors and a supernumerary tooth. Endodontic Dental Traumatology. 1997;13:196-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00039.x PMid:9550048

2. Kronfeld R. Dens in Dente. Journal of Dental Research. 1934;14:49-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345340140010801

3. Rushton M. A collection of dilated composite odontomas. British Dental Journal. 1937;63:65-85.

4. Atkinson SR. The permanent maxillary lateral incisor. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery 1943;29:685-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-6347(43)90330-8

5. Segura J, Hattab F, Ríos V. Maxillary canine transpositions in two brothers and one sister: associated dental anomalies and genetic basis. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 2002;69:54-58.

6. Gustafson G, Sundberg S. Dens in Dente. British Dental Journal. 1950;88.

7. Fischer C. Zur Frage des Dens in dente. Deutsche Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde. 1936;3:621-634.

8. Thomas JG. A study of dens in dente. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology. 1974;38:653-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90099-1 PMid:4528397

9. Ikeda H, Yoshioka T, Suda H. Importance of clinical examination and diagnosis: A case of dens invaginatus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79:88-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80080-0 PMid:7614169

10. Pindborg J. Pathology of the dental hard tissues. Philadelphia: Saunders. 1970.

11. Hosey MT, Bedi R. Multiple dens invaginatus in two brothers. Dental Traumatology. 1996;12:44-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1996.tb00094.x PMid:8631289

12. Oehlers FAC. Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome): I. Variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology. 1957;10:1204-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(57)90077-4 PMid:13477660

13. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endodontics. 2007;103:114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.001 PMid:17178504

14. Cheung GSP, Wei WLL, Mcgrath C. Agreement between periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of periapical status of root filled molar teeth. International Endodontic Journal. 2013;46:889-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12076 PMid:23442122

15. Durack C, Patel S. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2012;23:179-191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000300001 PMid:22814684

16. Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Roig M, Shemesh H, Lambrechts P, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: The use of CBCT in Endodontics. International Endodontic Journal. 2014;47:502-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12267 PMid:24815882

17. Munn Z, MClinSc SM, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2015;13:147-153. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054 PMid:26317388

18. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica 2016;20:148-160. PMid:25554246 PMCid:PMC4320440

19. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 2002;21:1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 PMid:12111919

20. OCEBM Levels of Evidence - Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), University of Oxford. 2022.

21. Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C, et al. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2012;65:934-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 PMid:22742910

22. Mabrouk R, Berrezouga L, Frih N. The Accuracy of CBCT in the Detection of Dens Invaginatus in a Tunisian Population. International Journal of Dentistry. 2021;25:2021:8826204. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8826204 PMid:33574845 PMCid:PMC7857918

23. Alkadi M, Almohareb R, Mansour S, Mehanny M, Alsadhan R. Assessment of dens invaginatus and its characteristics in maxillary anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:19727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99258-0 PMid:34611255 PMCid:PMC8492853

24. Chen L, Li Y, Wang H. Investigation of dens invaginatus in a Chinese subpopulation using Cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Diseases. 2021;27:1755-1760. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13702 PMid:33128413

25. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H, Ertas ET. A retrospective comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography versus rendered panoramic images in identifying the presence, types, and characteristics of dens invaginatus in a Turkish population. Journal of Endodontics. 2015;41:473-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.12.001 PMid:25595467

26. Patel S, Brown J, Semper M, Abella F, Mannocci F. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics. International Endodontic Journal. 2019;52:1675-1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13187 PMid:31301231

27. Schulze R, Heil U, Groß D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2011;40:265-273. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039 PMid:21697151 PMCid:PMC3520262

28.Setzer FC, Hinckley N, Kohli MR, Karabucak B. A Survey of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Use among Endodontic Practitioners in the United States. Journal of Endodontics. 2017;43:699-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.021 PMid:28292601

29. Wenzel A. Radiographic display of carious lesions and cavitation in approximal surfaces: Advantages and drawbacks of conventional and advanced modalities. 2014;72:251-264. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.888757 PMid:24512205