Caviedes-Bucheli
J, Rios-Osorio N, Gutiérrez de Pineres-Milazzo C, Jiménez-Peña M, Portigliatti
R, Gaviño-Orduña JF, Antúnez-Rivero M, Gomez-Sosa JF, Munoz HR. Effectiveness,
efficiency, and apical extrusion of 2 rotaries and 2 reciprocating systems in removing
filling material during endodontic retreatment. A systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(3):e250-63.
doi:10.4317/jced.59953
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59953
__________
References
|
1.
Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Sequeira-Byron P, Tsesis I, Rosen E, Lolato A,
Taschieri S. Endodontic procedures for retreatment of periapical lesions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD005511. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Bramante CM, Fidelis NS, Assumpçao TS, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante
AS, et al. Heat release, time required, and cleaning ability of Mtwo R and
ProTaper Universal retreatment systems in the removal of filling material. J
Endod. 2010;36:1870-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Lu Y, Wang R, Zhang L, Li HL, Zheng QH, Zhou XD, et al. Apically extruded
debris and irrigant with two Ni-Ti systems and hand files when removing root
fillings: a laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2013;46:1125-30. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Silva EJ, Sa L, Belladonna FG, Neves AA, Accorsi-Mendonça T, Vieira VT, et
al. Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment
of the apically extruded material. J Endod. 2014;40:2077-80. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating
single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod.
2012;38:850-2. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shaahang S. Outcomes of nonurgical
retreatment and endodontic surgery: A sistematic review. J Endod. 2009;35:930-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Rios MA, Villela AM, Cunha RS, Velasco RC, De Martin AS, Kato AS, et al.
Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system
for gutta-percha removal. J Endod. 2014;40:543-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al.
Development of AMSTAR: measurement tool to assess the methodological quality
of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Urrutia G, Bonfill X. PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the
publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Med Clin. 2010;135:507-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Faggion C. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental
materials. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12:182-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Prisma Group, Preferred reporting
items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The Prisma statement. J Clin
Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006-12. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
R Rödig T, Reicherts P, Konietschke F, Dullin C, Hahn W, Hülsmann M. Efficacy
of reciprocating and rotary Ni-Ti instruments for retreatment of curved root
canals assessed by micro-CT. Int Endod J. 2014;47:942-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, Mendonça TA, Lourenço C, Calixto C, et al.
Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file
rotary system. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:357-61. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Bernardes RA, Duarte MAH, Vivan RR, Alcalde MP, Vasconcelos BC, Bramante CM.
Comparison of three retreatment techniques with ultrasonic activation in
flattened canals using micro-computed tomography and scanning electron
microscopy. Int Endod J. 2016;49:890-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Çanakçi BC, Ustun Y, Er O, Genc Sen O. Evaluation of apically extruded debris
from curved root canal filling removal using 5 nickel-titanium systems. J
Endod. 2016;42:1101-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Alves RF, Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa JCN, Silveira SB, Provenzano JC,
Siqueira JF. Removal of Root canal fillings in curved canals using either reciprocating
single or rotary multi-instrument systems and a supplementary step with the
XP-Endo Finisher. J Endod. 2016;42:1114-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Delai D, Boijink D, Hoppe CB, Grecca AS, Kopper PMP. Apically extruded debris
in filling removal of curved canals using 3 niti systems and hand files. Braz
Dent J. 2018;29:54-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Delai D, Jardine AP, Mestieri LB, Bojing D, Fontanella VRC, Grecca FS, et al.
Efficacy of a thermally treated single-file compared with a rotary systems in
endodontic retreatment of curved canals: a micro-CT study. Clin Oral
Investig. 2019;23:1837-44. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Burbano Balseca MJ, Terán Ayala SB, Da Costa Aznar FD, De Freitas-Aznar AR,
Aguirre Balseca GM, Freitas KMS. In vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded
Debris during Root Canal Retreatment with Rotary and Reciprocating Systems.
Open Dent J. 2019;13:488-92. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Topcuoglu H S, Demirbuga S, Topcuoglu G. Evaluation of apically extruded
debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different
Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption.
Int Endod J. 2020;53:403-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Dincer AN, Er O, Çanakçi BC. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during
root canal retreatment with several Ni-Ti systems. Int Endod J. 2015;48:1194-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Akbulut MB, Akman M, Terlemez A, Magat G, Sener S. Efficacy of Twisted File
Adaptive, Reciproc and ProTaper Universal Retreatment instruments for root
canal filling removal: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Dent Mater J.
2016;35:126-31. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Crozeta BM, Silva-Sousa YT, Leoni GB, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Fantinato T,
Baratto-Filho F, et al. Micro-computed tomography study of Filling Material
Removal from Oval-shaped Canals by Using Rotary, Reciprocating, and Adaptive
Motion Systems. J Endod. 2016;42:793-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Monguilhott Crozeta B, Damiao de Souza-Neto M, Bianchi Leoni G, Mazzi-Chavez
JF, Correa Silva-Sousa YT, Baratto-Filho F. A micro-computed tomography
assessment of the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for filling
material removal in root canal retreatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2235-40. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Özyürek T, Demiryürek EO. Efficacy of different nickel-titanium instruments
in removing gutta-percha during root canal retreatment. J Endod. 2016;42:646-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Bago I, Katic M, Gabric D, Anic I. Comparison of the effectiveness of various
rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove
gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer from straight root canals. Int
Endod J. 2019;52:105-13. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Bitter K, Gruner D, Wolf O, Schwendicke F. Artificial versus natural teeth
for pre-clinical endodontic training: A randomized controlled trial. J Endod.
2016;42:1212-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Goodis HE, Marshall Jr GW, White JM, Gee L, Hornberger B, Marshall SJ.
Storage effects on dentin permeability and shear bond strengths. Dent Mater.
1993;9:79-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Surakanti JR, Venkata RC, Vemisetty H, Dandolu RK, Jaya NK, Thota S.
Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal
preparation using ProTaperTM, HyflexTM and WaveoneTM rotary systems. J
Conserv Dent. 2014;17:129-32. |
|
|
|
|
|
30.
Martin H, Cunningham WT. The effect of endosonic and hand manipulation on the
amount of root canal material extruded. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.
1982;53:611-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.
Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The
influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary file systems on the
apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic
apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J.
2016;49:255-70. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.
Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, Huang XY. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary
retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals. Int Endod J.
2008;41:288-95. |
|
|
|
|
|
33.
Tasdemir T, Yildirim T, Celik D. Comparative study of removal of current
endodontic fillings. J Endod. 2008;34:326-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
34.
Takahashi CM, Cunha RS, de Martin AS, Fontana CE, Silveira CF, da Silveira
Bueno CE. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal
rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent.
J Endod. 2009;35:1580-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
35.
Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Türker SA, Sağsen B, Er O. Apical extrusion of debris
using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary
instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2013;39:1278-80. |
|
|
|
|
|
36.
Tasdemir T, Er K, Çelik D, Aydemir H. An in vitro comparison of apically
extruded debris using three rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Dent Sci.
2010;5:121-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
37.
Schäfer E, Köster M, Bürklein S. Percentage of gutta-percha-filled areas in
canals instrumented with nickel-titanium systems and obturated with matching
single cones. J Endod. 2013;39:924-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
38.
Sae-Lim V, Rajamanickam I, Lim BK, Lee HL. Effectiveness of ProFile .04 taper
rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2000;26:100-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
39.
De Carvalho Maciel AC, Zaccaro Scelza MF. Efficacy of automated versus hand
instrumentation during root canal retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J.
2006;39:779-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
40.
Capar ID, Arslan H, Ertas H, Gök T, Saygılı G. Effectiveness of ProTaper
Universal retreatment instruments used with rotary or reciprocating adaptive
motion in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J.
2015;48:79-83. |
|
|
|
|
|
41.
Zuolo AS, Mello Jr JE, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CE. Efficacy of
reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root
canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2013;46:947-53. |
|
|
|
|
|
42.
Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et
al. Artifacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:265-73. |
|
|
|
|
|
43.
Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments
and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals
during retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2007;40:532-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
44.
Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically
by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod. 1991;17:275-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
45.
Xu LL, Zhang L, Zhou XD, Wang R, Deng YH, Huang DM. Residual filling material
in dentinal tubules after gutta-percha removal observed with scanning
electron microscopy. J Endod. 2012;38:293-6. |
|