Martínez I, Lozano A, Sanz JL, Forner L, Llena C. Diameter and taper variability of gutta-percha cones adapted to TruNatomyTM and RotateTM rotary file systems. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(1):e17-22.

doi:10.4317/jced.59992

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59992

___________

References

1. Godiny M, Hatam R, Khavid A, Khanlari S. Apical microleakage in root canals containing broken rotary instruments. Iran Endod J. 2017;12:360-5. PMid:28808466 PMCid:PMC5527215

2. Vishwanath V, Rao H. Gutta-percha in endodontics. A comprehensive review of material science. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22:216. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_420_18 PMid:31367101 PMCid:PMC6632621

3. International Organization for Standardization. Endodontic instruments. Part 1: General requirements. ISO 3630-1:2019.

4. Haupt F, Seidel M, Rizk M, Sydow H, Wiegand A. Diameter and taper variability of single-file instrumentation systems and their corresponding gutta-percha cones. J Endod. 2018;44:1436-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.06.005 PMid:30078573

5. Chesler M, Tordik P, Imamura G, Goodell G. Intramanufacturer diameter and taper variability of rotary instruments and their corresponding gutta-percha cones. J Endod. 2013; 39:538-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.029 PMid:23522553

6. Cueva-Goig R, Forner-Navarro L, Llena-Puy C. Microscopic assessment of the sealing ability of three endodontic filling techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8:e27-31. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52847 PMid:26855702 PMCid:PMC4739364

7. Gündoğar M, Uslu G, Özyürek T. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.Rotate, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium rotary files at body temperature. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45:e37. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e37 PMid:32839718 PMCid:PMC7431933

8. Ertuğrul İ, Orhan E. Cyclic fatigue and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy examination of the novel Rotate instrument. Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82:2041-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23374 PMid:31512350

9. Elnaghy A, Elsaka S, Elshazli A. Dynamic cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of TruNatomy compared with different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Aust Endod J. 2020;46:226-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12396 PMid:32022376

10. International Organization for Standardization. Dental root-canal obturating points. ISO 6877:2006.

11. Lask J, Walker M, Kulid J, Cunninghm K, Shull P. Variability of the diameter and taper of Size #30, 0.04 nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2006;32:1171-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.013 PMid:17174675

12. Hatch G, Roberts S, Joyce A, Runner R, McPherson J. Comparative study of the variability of 0.06 tapered rotary endodontic files to current taper standards. J Endod. 2008;34:463-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.003 PMid:18358898

13. Kim K, Cho K, Park S, Choi K, Karabucak B. A comparison of dimensional standard of several nickel-titanium rotary files. Restor Dent Endod. 2014;39:7-11. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.7 PMid:24516823 PMCid:PMC3916510

14. Briseño B, Wolter D, Willershausen-Zönnchen B. Dimensional variability of nonstandardized greater taper finger spreaders with matching gutta-percha points. Int Endod J. 2001;34:23-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00344.x PMid:11307377

15. Valois C, Silva L Azevedo R, Costa E. Atomic force microscopy study of gutta-percha cone topography. Oral Surgery, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2004;98:250-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.02.076 PMid:15316553

16. Salles A, Cord C, Sonnemann T, De Melo T, Irala L. Comparative analysis of the diameter of MTwo® system gutta-percha points in relation to their corresponding instruments. RBSO. 2013;10:1984-85. https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v10i1.894

17. Bajaj N, Monga P, Mahajan P. Assessment of consistency in the dimension of gutta-percha cones of ProTaper Next and WaveOne with their corresponding number files. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:201-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_167_16 PMid:28729793 PMCid:PMC5502565

18. Moule A, Kellaway R, Clarkson R, Rowell J, Macfarlane R. Variability of master gutta-percha cones. Aust Endod J. 2002;28:38-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2002.tb00365.x PMid:12360680

19. Hartwell G, Barbieri S, Gerard S, Gunsolley J. Evaluation of size variation between endodontic finger spreaders and accessory gutta-percha cones. J Endod. 1991;17:8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80153-1 PMid:1895040

20. Mirmohammadi H, Sitarz M, Shemesh H. Intra-manufacture diameter variability of rotary files and their corresponding gutta-percha cones using laser scan micrometre. Iran Endod J. 2018;13:159-62. PMid:29707008 PMCid:PMC5911287

21. Luzi A, Forner L, Almenar A, Llena C. Microestructure alterations of rotary files after multiple simulated operative procedures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e658-62. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e658 PMid:20038892

22. Moon H, Lee J, Ahnn J, Song H, Park Y. Temperature-dependent rheological property changes of thermoplastic gutta-percha root filling materials. Int Endod J. 2015;48:556-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12349 PMid:25070290

23. Gergi R, Abou R, Osta N, Sader J, Naaman A. Taper preparation variability compared to current taper standards using computed tomography. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:265695. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/265695 PMid:22518136 PMCid:PMC3299324

24. Abreu-Rodriguez R; Naval-Estave V, Pallares-Sabater A. Compatibilidad dimensional entre los conos accesorios de gutapercha y los espaciadores. 2004;9:1138-123. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1138-123X2004000600003

25. Abdullah M, Bashiri A, Khalid A, Saad A, Hadi M. Cyclic fatigue comparison of TruNatomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems. Int J Dent. 2020;11:319-3. PMid:32184827 PMCid:PMC7061136

26. Van der Vyver P, Vorster M, Peters O. Minimally invasive endodontics using a new single-file rotary system. Oralhealth. 2019;9:6-20.