Godiny M, Mohammadi B, Norooznezhad M, Chalabi M. Endodontic Rotary Systems: Comparison between Gentlefile and Pro Taper Universal for removal of Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(4):e277-80.

doi:10.4317/jced.60147

__________

References

1. Martinho FC, Gomes AP, Fernandes AM, Ferreira NS, Endo MS, et al. Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals. J Endod. 2014;40:625-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.006 PMid:24767554

2. Polineni S, Damaraju B, Bolla N, Sunil C, Krishna NV, et al. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23:314. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_283_19 PMid:33551607 PMCid:PMC7861072

3. Fabricious L, Dahlen G, Öhman AE, Möller AJ. Predominant indigenous oral bacteria isolated from infected root canals after varied times of closure. Eur J Oral Sci. 1982;90:134-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1982.tb01536.x PMid:6951255

4. Sedgley C, Lennan S, Appelbe O. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2005;38:735-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01009.x PMid:16164688

5. Machado MEdL, Nabeshima CK, Caballero-Flores H, Elmadjian-Filho M, Duarte MAH, et al. Instrument design may influence bacterial reduction during root canal preparation. Braz Dent J. 2017;28:587-91. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201701506 PMid:29215683

6. Xu B, Kang G. Phase field simulation on the super-elasticity, elastocaloric and shape memory effect of geometrically graded nano-polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;201:106462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106462

7. Wu J, Lei G, Yan M, Yu Y, Yu J, Zhang G. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy. J Endod. 2011;37:758-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.021 PMid:21787484

8. Moreinos D, Dakar A, Stone NJ, Moshonov J. Evaluation of time to fracture and vertical forces applied by a novel Gentlefile system for root canal preparation in simulated root canals. J Endod. 2016;42:505-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.023 PMid:26831050

9. Htun PH, Ebihara A, Maki K, Kimura S, Nishijo M, Okiji T. Cleaning and shaping ability of Gentlefile, HyFlex EDM, and ProTaper Next instruments: a combined micro-computed tomographic and scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 2020;46:973-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.027 PMid:32418616

10. Siqueira Junior JF, Rôças IdN, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Ricucci D. Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0065 PMid:30365606

11. Peters OA, Schönenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001;34:221-30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x PMid:12193268

12. Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35:1056-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.020 PMid:19567334

13. Siqueira Jr J, Pérez A, Marceliano-Alves M, Provenzano J, Silva S, Pires FR, et al. What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J. 2018;51:501-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12753 PMid:28196289

14. Machado MLE, Sapia LAB, Cai S, Martins GHR, Nabeshima CK. Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection. J Endod. 2010;36:1238-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.012 PMid:20630307

15. Machado MEdL, Nabeshima C, Leonardo M, Reis F, Britto M, Cai S. Influence of reciprocating single-file and rotary instrumentation on bacterial reduction on infected root canals. Int Endod J. 2013;46:1083-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12108 PMid:23566213

16. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments. J Endod. 2014;40:1638-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.004 PMid:25260737

17. Tewari RK, Ali S, Mishra SK, Kumar A, Andrabi SMUN, Zoya A, et al. Mechanical reduction of the intracanal enterococcus faecalis population by Hyflex CM, K3 XF, ProTaper Next, and two manual instrument systems: an in vitro comparative study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2016;7:168-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12136 PMid:25424649

18. Machado CAD, Souza ACA, Loureiro C, Martinho FC, Cintra LTÂ, Junior ED, et al. Comparison of two rotary systems in bacteria/lps removal from endodontic infections: randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019:e039-e. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0039 PMid:31508729

19. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2004;37:239-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x PMid:15056350

20. Neelakantan P, Khan K, Li K, Shetty H, Xi W. Effectiveness of supplementary irrigant agitation with the Finisher GF Brush on the debridement of oval root canals instrumented with the Gentlefile or nickel titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2018;51:800-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12892 PMid:29363136