Nogueira EFC, Almeida RAC, de Souza BLM, Aguiar PL, Vasconcellos RJH. Why choose articaine over lidocaine for the removal of third molars? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(11):e963-77.

doi:10.4317/jced.60682

_______

References

1. Rathi NV, Khatri AA, Agrawal AG, M SB, Thosar NR, Deolia SG. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth. Anesth Prog. 2019;66:3-7. https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-65-04-02 PMid:30883236 PMCid:PMC6424172

2. de Morais HHA, Santos TS, Araújo FAC, Xavier RLF, Vajgel A, Vasconcellos RJH. Hemodynamic Changes Comparing 2% Lidocaine and 4% Articaine With Epinephrine 1: 100,000 in Lower Third Molar Surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1204-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824f66a0 PMid:22801130

3. Zhang A, Tang H, Liu S, Ma C, Ma S, Zhao H. Anesthetic Efficiency of Articaine Versus Lidocaine in the Extraction of Lower Third Molars: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.020 PMid:30267700

4. Nagendrababu V, Duncan HF, Whitworth J, Nekoofar MH, Pulikkotil SJ, Veettil SK, Dummer PMH. Is articaine more effective than lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis? An umbrella review. Int Endod J. 2020;53:200-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13215 PMid:31491042

5. Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:493-504. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0219 PMid:21531931

6. Katyal V. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis. J Dent. 2010;38:307-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.003 PMid:20006669

7. Su N, Li C, Wang H, Shen J, Liu W, Kou L. Efficacy and safety of articaine versus lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Aust Endod J. 2016;42:4-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12125 PMid:27062318

8. Costa CG, Tortamano IP, Rocha RG, Francischone CE, Tortamano N. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration. Quintessence Int. 2005;36:197-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.012 PMid:15887505

9. Bartlett G, Mansoor J. Articaine buccal infiltration vs lidocaine inferior dental block - a review of the literature. Br Dent J. 2016;220:117-120. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.93 PMid:26868800

10. Beena S, Bhargava D, Gurjar P, Shrivastava S, Dalsingh V, Koneru G. Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;121:248-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.011 PMid:31336212

11. Saralaya S, Adirajaiah SB, Anehosur V. 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine for Surgical Removal of Third Molar by Mandibular Nerve Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial for Efficacy and Safety. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019;18:405-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1109-0 PMid:31371883 PMCid:PMC6639500

12. Haase A, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Drum M. Com¬paring anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1228-1235 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0338 PMid:18762633

13. Powell V. Articaine is superior to lidocaine in providing pulpal anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:897-898. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0294 PMid:22855904

14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PMid:19621072 PMCid:PMC2707599

15. Julian PT Higgins, Jelena Savović, Matthew J Page, Jonathan AC Sterne. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. (RoB 2). 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch8

16. Bhagat MJ, Narayan V, Muthusekhar MR, Jain AR. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% Lignocaine in the inferior alveolar nerve block during the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Universal Research Journal of Dentistry. 2014;4:108-114. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-9725.132975 PMid:17322803

17. Im TY, Hwang KG. Randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical trial on the efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia. J Korean Dent Soc Anesthesiol. 2010;10:1. https://doi.org/10.17245/jkdsa.2010.10.1.1

18. Kambalimath DH, Dolas RS, Kambalimath HV, Agrawal SM. Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013;12:3-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-012-0368-4 PMid:24431806 PMCid:PMC3589513

19. Kaur H, Kataria R. Articaine vs Lidocaine in Removal of Third Molar Surgery: A Clinical Study. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4:1889-1891. PMid:29959306

20. Martínez-Rodríguez N, Dorado CB, Arés MM, Brinkman JCB, González JMM. Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. A comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:345-51. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17414 PMid:22143691 PMCid:PMC3448332

21. Shruthi R, Kedarnath N, Mamatha N, Rajaram P, Bhadrashetty D. Articaine For Surgical Removal of Impacted Third Molar; A Comparison With Lignocaine. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:48-53. PMid:24155578 PMCid:PMC3768079

22. Sierra-Rebolledo A, Delgado Molina E, Berini Aytís L, Gay Escoda C. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:139-44. PMid:17322803

23. Silva LC, Santos TD, Santos JA, Maia MC, Mendonça CG. Articaine versus lidocaine for third molar surgery: a randomized clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e140-e145. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17148 PMid:22157664 PMCid:PMC3448204

24. Vigneswaran T, Aravind R. A randomized study of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine for surgical removal of the third molar. Drug Invention Today. 2019;12:632-635.

25. Jain NK, John RR. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10:356-61. https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.171445 PMid:27212774 PMCid:PMC4864681

26. Mittal J, Kaur G, Mann HS, Narang S, Kamra M, Kapoor S, et al. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(6):743-748. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2329 PMid:29959306

27. Boonsiriseth K, Chaimanakarn S, Chewpreecha P, Nonpassopon N, Khanijou M, Ping B, et al. 4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017;17:29-35. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.1.29 PMid:28879326 PMCid:PMC5564134

28. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study. J Endod. 2006;32:296-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.016 PMid:16554198

29. Camps-Font O, Figueiredo R, Sánchez-Torres A, Clé-Ovejero A, Coulthard P, Gay-Escoda C, et al. Which is the most suitable local anaesthetic when inferior nerve blocks are used for impacted mandibular third molar extraction? A network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020;49:1497-1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.016 PMid:32473767

30. Haas DA, Lennon D. A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995;61:319-20,323-6,329-30. PMid:7736335

31. Hillerup S, Jensen R. Nerve injury caused by mandibular block analgesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:437-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.10.004 PMid:16343853

32. Gaffen AS, Haas DA. Retrospective review of voluntary reports of nonsurgical paresthesia in dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009;75:579. PMid:19840499

33. Nogueira EFC, Araújo FAC, Faro TF, Almeida RAC, Vasconcellos RJH. Does the use of articaine increase the risk of hypoesthesia in lower third molar surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79:64-74. PMid:32976834

34. Zanjir M, Lighvan NL, Yarascavitch C, Beyene J, Shah PS, Azarpazhooh A. Efficacy and Safety of Pulpal Anesthesia Strategies during Endodontic Treatment of Permanent Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2019;45:1435-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.09.002 PMid:31601433

35. Malet A, Faure M, Deletage N, Pereira B, Haas J, Lambert G. The comparative cytotoxic effects of different local anesthetics on a human neuroblastoma cell line. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:589-596. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000562 PMid:25514420

36. Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a current update. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2012;40:795-797. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2012.12220955 PMid:23316560

37. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, LeBlanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:177-185. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0152 PMid:11217590

38. Pellicer-Chover H, Cervera-Ballester J, Sanchis-Bielsa JM, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, García-Mira B. Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5:e66-71. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.50869 PMid:24455059 PMCid:PMC3892217

39. Porto GG, Vasconcelos BC, Gomes AC, Albert D. Evaluation of lidocaine and mepivacaine for inferior third molar surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:e60-4. PMid:17195831

40. Colombini BL, Modena KCS, Calvo AM, Sakai VT, Giglio FPM, Dionísio TJ, et al. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:169-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.003 PMid:16876058

41. Gregorio LVL, Giglio FPM, Sakai VT, Modena KCS, Colombini BL, Calvo AM, et al. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.11.024 PMid:18420431

42. Bouloux GF, Punnia-Moorthy A. Bupivacaine versus lidocaine for third molar surgery: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:510-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90063-0 PMid:10319823

43. Senes AM, Calvo AM, Colombini-Ishikiriama BL, Gonçalves PZ, Dionísio TJ, Santana E, et al. Efficacy and Safety of 2% and 4% Articaine for Lower Third Molar Surgery. J Dent Res. 2015;94:166S-73S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515596313 PMid:26202994

44. de Morais HHA, Santos TS, Araújo FAC, Vajgel A, Vasconcellos RJH. Hemodynamic Changes Comparing Lidocaine HCl With Epinephrine and Articaine HCl With Epinephrine. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1703-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826bec3b PMid:23147329