Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Kılıç-Süloğlu A, Öztürk S. Comparison of the Cytotoxic Effect of 3D-Printed Resins, Resin-based CAD/CAM blocks and Composite Resin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(12):e984-90.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.60987

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60987

________

 

References

1. Fugolin APP, Pfeifer CS. New resins for dental composites. J Dent Res. 2017;96:1085-91.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517720658
PMid:28732183 PMCid:PMC5582688

 

2. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014;93:1232-4.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
PMid:25344335 PMCid:PMC4462808

 

3. Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:503-10.
https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4835
PMid:27611757

 

4. Palaganas NB, Mangadlao JD, de Leon ACC, Palaganas JO, Pangilinan KD, Lee YJ, et al. 3D printing of photocurable cellulose nanocrystal composite for fabrication of complex architectures via stereolithography. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:34314-24.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b09223
PMid:28876895

 

5. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:192-200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003
PMid:29110921 PMCid:PMC5801146

 

6. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016;32:54-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018
PMid:26494268

 

7. Piedra-Cascón W, Krishnamurthy VR, Att W, Revilla-León M. 3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: A narrative review. J Dent. 2021;109:103630.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103630
PMid:33684463

 

8. Salmi M. Possibilities of preoperative medical models made by 3D printing or additive manufacturing. J Med Eng. 2016;2016:1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6191526
PMid:27433470 PMCid:PMC4940539

 

9. Barutcigil K, Dündar A, Batmaz SG, Yıldırım K, Barutçugil Ç. Do resin-based composite CAD/CAM blocks release monomers? Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:329-36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03377-3
PMid:32488490

 

10. Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Spahl W, et al. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblast cultures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41:474-80.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<474::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-I

 

11. Ling L, Ma Y, Malyala R. A novel CAD/CAM resin composite block with high mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2021;37:1150-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.006
PMid:33849756

 

12. Canatan S, Oz FD, Bolay S. A randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of two resin cement systems in the adhesion of CAD/CAM-fabricated resin nanoceramic restorations: 18-month preliminary results. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34:1005-14.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12910
PMid:35388956

 

13. Atria PJ, Bordin D, Marti F, Nayak VV, Conejo J, Benalcázar Jalkh E, et al. 3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations: Comparison of mechanical and biological properties. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34:804-15.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12888
PMid:35187786

 

14. ISO 10993-12:2021. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials, Geneva, 2021.

 

15. Van Landuyt KL, Nawrot T, Geebelen B, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Yoshihara K, et al. How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach. Dent Mater. 2011;27:723-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.001
PMid:21664675

 

16. Murray PE, García Godoy C, García Godoy F. How is the biocompatibilty of dental biomaterials evaluated? Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:258-66.

PMid:17468726

 

17. ISO 10993-5:2009. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials, Geneva, 2009.

 

18. Lim SM, Yap AUJ, Loo CSL, Ng J, Goh CY, Hong C, et al. Comparison of cytotoxicity test models for evaluating resin-based composites. Human Exp Toxicol. 2016;34:339-48.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327116650007
PMid:27198678

 

19. Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:441-52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01158.x
PMid:7965355

 

20. Altintas SH, Usumez A. Evaluation of monomer leaching from a dual cured resin cement. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2008;86B:523-9.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31052
PMid:18360880

 

21. Taormina G, Sciancalepore C, Messori M, Bondioli F. 3Dprinting processes for photocurable polymeric materials: technologies, materials, and future trends. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2018;16:151-60.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800018764770
PMid:29609487

 

22. Kessler A, Reichl FX, Folwaczny M, Högg C. Monomer release from surgical guide resins manufactured with different 3D printing devices. Dent Mater. 2020;36:1486-92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.002
PMid:32972769

 

23. Moharamzadeh K, Noort RV, Brook IM, Scutt AM. Cytotoxicity of resin monomers on human gingival fibroblasts and HaCaT keratinocytes. Dent Mater. 2007;23:40-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.039
PMid:16426672

 

24. Grenade C, De Pauw-Gillet MC, Pirard C, Bertrand V, Charlier C, Vanheusden A, et al. Biocompatibility of polymer-infiltrated-ceramicnetwork (PICN) materials with human gingival keratinocytes (HGKs). Dent Mater. 2017;33:333-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.001
PMid:28159322

 

25. Tassin M, Bonte E, Loison-Robert LS, Nassif A, Berbar T, Le Goff S, et al. Effects of high-temperature pressurepolymerized resin-infiltrated ceramic networks on oral stemcells. PLoS One. 2016;11:1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155450
PMid:27196425 PMCid:PMC4873200

 

26. Krifka S, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. A review of adaptive mechanisms in cell responses towards oxidativestress caused by dental resin monomers. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4555-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.019
PMid:23541107

 

27. Wuersching SN, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Kollmuss M. Initial biocompatibility of novel resins for 3D printed fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater. 2022;38:1587-97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.08.001
PMid:36008188

 

28. Ide Y, Nayar S, Logan H, Gallagher B, Wolfaardt J. The effect of the angle of acuteness of additive manufactured models and the direction of printing on the dimensional fidelity: clinical implications. Odontology. 2017;105:108-115.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0239-4
PMid:26995273

 

29. Lin CH, Lin YM, Lai YL, Lee SY. Mechanical properties, accuracy, and cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D printing resins composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:349-354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.002
PMid:31202550

 

30. Kim D, Shim JS, Lee D, Shin SH, Nam NE, Park KH, et al. Effects of post-curing time on the mechanical and color properties of three-dimensional printed crown and bridge materials. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12:2762.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112762
PMid:33238528 PMCid:PMC7700600

 

31. Bayarsaikhan E, Lim JH, Shin SH, Park KH, Park YB, Lee JH, et al. Effects of postcuring temperature on the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of three-dimensional printed dental resin material. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13:1180.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081180
PMid:33916899 PMCid:PMC8067535

 

32. Süsgün Yıldırım Z, Eyiler E, Bek Kürklü ZG. Effect of thickness on the degree of conversion, monomer elution, depth of cure and cytotoxicity of bulk-fill composites. J Oral Sci. 2023;65:121-6.
https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0374
PMid:36990756