Peralta-Mamani M, Rubira CMF, López-López J, Honório HM, Rubira-Bullen IRF. CBCT vs panoramic radiography in assessment of impacted upper canine and root resorption of the adjacent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(2):e198-222.

doi:10.4317/jced.61285

______

References

1. Al-Zoubi H, Alharbi AA, Ferguson DJ, Zafar MS. Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: A retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:117-121. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_308_16 PMid:28435377 PMCid:PMC5379823

2. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:249-56. PMid:7978519

3. Sarica I, Derindag G, Kurtuldu E, Naralan ME, Caglayan F. A retrospective study: Do all impacted teeth cause pathology? Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22:527-533. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_563_18 PMid:30975958

4. Bjerklin K, Ericson S. How a computerized tomography examination changed the treatment plans of 80 children with retained and ectopically positioned maxillary canines. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0084-3717(08)70240-X

5. Chung DD, Weisberg M, Pagala M. Incidence and effects of genetic factors on canine impaction in an isolated Jewish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthoped. 2011;139:e331-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.023 PMid:21457839

6. Hamada Y, Timothius CJC, Shin D, John V. Canine impaction - A review of the prevalence, etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Semin Orthod. 2019;25:117-123. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2019.05.002

7. Ericson S, Kurol J. Incisor resorption caused by maxillary cuspids. A radiographic study. Angle Orthod. 1987;57:332-346. PMid:3479035

8. Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, Wu YT, Ma XC. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.030 PMid:17507268

9. Lai CS, Suter VG, Katsaros C, Bornstein MM. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36:450-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt074 PMid:24123189

10. Bender IB. Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions. J Endod. 1982;8:161-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80212-4 PMid:6951916

11. Rodrigues MGS, Alarcón OMV, Rocha ECJF, Capelozza ALA. Cone-beam computed tomography: Formation of the image, indications and selection criteria. Odontol Clín-Cient. 2010;9:115-118.

12. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:93-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq034 PMid:21270321

13. Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo PM, Heidmann J, Melsen B. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:344-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq102 PMid:21131389

14. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 PMid:33781993 PMCid:PMC8005925

15. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, Dean RS. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011458. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458 PMid:27932337 PMCid:PMC5168618

16. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1:97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12 PMid:26061376

17. Maverna R, Gracco A. Different diagnostic tools for the localization of impacted maxillary canines: clinical considerations. Prog Orthod. 2007;8:28-44. PMid:17364031

18. Pico CL, do Vale FJ, Caramelo FJ, Corte-Real A, Pereira SM. Comparative analysis of impacted upper canines: Panoramic radiograph Vs Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e1176-e1182. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53652 PMid:29167705 PMCid:PMC5694144

19. Cuminetti F, Boutin F, Frapier L. Predictive factors for resorption of teeth adjacent to impacted maxillary canines. Int Orthod. 2017;15:54-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2016.12.011

20. Tsolakis AI, Kalavritinos M, Bitsanis E, Sanoudos M, Benetou V, Alexiou K, et al. Reliability of different radiographic methods for the localization of displaced maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.026 PMid:29407509

21. Pittayapat P, Willems G, Alqerban A, Coucke W, Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Souza,PC, et al. Agreement between cone beam computed tomography images and panoramic radiographs for initial orthodontic evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117:111-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.10.016 PMid:24332335

22. Serrant PS, McIntyre GT, Thomson DJ. Localization of ectopic maxillary canines is CBCT more accurate than conventional horizontal or vertical parallax? J Orthod. 2014;41:13-8. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000076 PMid:24671285

23. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC, Willems G. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:764.e1-11;discussion 764-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.036 PMid:19962592

24. Bouwens DG, Cevidanes L, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:126-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.016 PMid:21195286 PMCid:PMC3036614

25. Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, Huang JC. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:590-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.035 PMid:20451777

26. Jung YH, Liang H, Benson BW, Flint DJ, Cho BH. The assessment of impacted maxillary canine position with panoramic radiography and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:356-60. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/14055036 PMid:22116130 PMCid:PMC3520357

27. Wriedt S, Jaklin J, Al-Nawas B, Wehrbein H. Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop. 2012;73:28-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0058-8 PMid:22246048

28. Alqerban A, Hedesiu M, Baciut M, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, et al. Pre-surgical treatment planning of maxillary canine impactions using panoramic vs cone beam CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20130157. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130157 PMid:23906975 PMCid:PMC3828021

29. Ucar FI, Celebi AA, Tan E, Topcuoğlu T, Sekerci AE. Effects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisors: A cone beam computed tomography study. J Orofac Orthop. 2017;78:233-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0077-6 PMid:28204849

30. Björksved M, Magnuson A, Bazargani SM, Lindsten R, Bazargani F. Are panoramic radiographs good enough to render correct angle and sector position in palatally displaced canines? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155:380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.05.015 PMid:30826041

31. Ngo CTT, Fishman LS, Rossouw PE, Wang H, Said O. Correlation between panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary impacted canines. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:384-389. https://doi.org/10.2319/103117-739.1 PMid:29561656 PMCid:PMC8191926

32. Akkuc S, Duruk G, Duman S. Evaluation of impacted canines' localization and adjacent lateral incisors' root resorption with orthopantomography and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2021;37:476-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00482-7 PMid:32949336

33. Alfaleh W, Al Thobiani S. Evaluation of impacted maxillary canine position using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33:738-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.014 PMid:34803328 PMCid:PMC8589574

34. Andresen AKH, Jonsson MV, Sulo G, Thelen DS, Shi XQ. Radiographic features in 2D imaging as predictors for justified CBCT examinations of canine-induced root resorption. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;51:20210165. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210165 PMid:34324382 PMCid:PMC8693324

35. Ardakani MP, Nabavizadeh A, Iranmanesh F, Hosseini J, Nakhaei M. Relationship of angulation of maxillary impacted canines with maxillary lateral incisor root resorption. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2021;21:e0164. https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2021.070

36. Simić S, Nikolić PV, Pavlović J, Vukićević V, Vujačić A. Root resorption of adjacent teeth due to maxillary impacted canines-comparative analysis of the findings on cone beam computed tomography and panoramic imaging. Vojnosanitetski pregled 2023;80:136-142. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP201004021S

37. Sosars P, Jakobsone G, Neimane L, Mukans M. Comparative analysis of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in treatment planning of palatally displaced canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157:719-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.012 PMid:32354444

38. Sarıkır Ç, Alkurt MT, Değerli Ş, Altunkaynak B, Peker İ. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for qualitative and quantitative measurements regarding localization of permanent impacted maxillary canines. Acta Odontol Turc. 2017;34:1-7. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.277844

39. Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Hang WM, Andersen WC, Isaacson RJ. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123:95-97. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0069 PMid:1545064

40. Alessandri BG, Zanarini M, Danesi M, Parenti SI, Gatto MR. Percentiles relative to maxillary permanent canine inclination by age: a radiologic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:486.e1-6;discussion 486-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.022 PMid:19815142

41. Stivaros N, Mandall NA. Radiographic factors affecting the management of impacted upper permanent canines. J Orthod. 2000;27:169-173. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/27.2.169 PMid:10867073

42. Grisar K, Piccart F, Al-Rimawi AS, Basso I, Politis C, Jacobs R. Three-dimensional position of impacted maxillary canines: Prevalence, associated pathology and introduction to a new classification system. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019;5:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.151 PMid:31943949 PMCid:PMC7938402

43. European Commission. Radiation protection 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. In: Evidence Based Guidelines. 2012 http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf

44. Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Ilo AM, Waltimo-Sirén J, Ekholm M. Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:897-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02904-1 PMid:31236733

45. Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud MI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:248-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.018 PMid:28153153

46. Dağsuyu İM, Kahraman F, Okşayan R. Three-dimensional evaluation of angular, linear, and resorption features of maxillary impacted canines on cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2018;34:66-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-017-0289-5 PMid:30484094

47. Kadesjö N, Lynds R, Nilsson M, Shi XQ. Radiation dose from X-ray examinations of impacted canines: cone beam CT vs two-dimensional imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;47:20170305. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170305 PMid:29303367 PMCid:PMC6047634

48. Ladeira DB, Cruz AD, Almeida SM, Bóscolo FN. Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:417-21. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/59761876 PMid:22282504 PMCid:PMC3520349

49. Devlin H, Yuan J. Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:29951683. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/29951683 PMid:22933529 PMCid:PMC3729190

50. Abdinian M, Soheilipour F, Nazeri R, Ghorbanizadeh S. Investigation of the magnifi cation of digital panoramic radiographs in different regions of the jaws. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2016;7:10-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-433X.176476