Radwan M, Abdou A, Tawfik A, Bills P, Blunt L, Kusumasari C, Mahrous A. Trueness of vat-photopolymerization printing technology of interim fixed partial denture with different building orientation: A Microcomputed tomography study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2024;16(4):e494-502.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.61422

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61422

______

 

References

1. Driscoll CF, Freilich MA, Guckes AD, Knoernschild KL, Mcgarry TJ. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:e1-105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001

PMid:28418832

 

2. Saisadan D, Manimaran P, Meenapriya PK. In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8:S105-9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.191936
PMid:27829758 PMCid:PMC5074009

 

3. Guazzato M, Santosa R, Chou JPY. Provisionalisation in Fixed Prosthodontics. Oral Rehabilitation. John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd. West Sussex, UK; 2012. 53-60 p.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118702888.ch7

 

4. Digholkar S, Madhav VN V, Palaskar J. Evaluation of the flexural strength and microhardness of provisional crown and bridge materials fabricated by different methods. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16:328-34.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.191288
PMid:27746595 PMCid:PMC5062140

 

5. Abdou A, Takagaki T, Alghamdi A, Tichy A, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Bonding performance of dispersed filler resin composite cad/cam blocks with different surface treatment protocols. Dent Mater J. 2021;40:209-19.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-049
PMid:33162457

 

6. Muehlenfeld C, Roberts SA. 3D/4D printing in additive manufacturing: process engineering and novel excipients. 3D 4D Print Biomed Appl Process Eng Addit Manuf. 2019;1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527813704.ch1

 

7. Punia U, Kaushik A, Garg RK, Chhabra D, Sharma A. 3D printable biomaterials for dental restoration: A systematic review. Mater Today Proc. 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.018

 

8. Radwan MM, Abdou A, Nagi N, Younes DH, Mahrous A. Wear characteristics of esthetic resin matrix and zirconia reinforced lithium disilicate CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear and surface topography analysis. Minerva Dent oral Sci. 2023;72:280-290.
https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04779-4
PMid:37255305

 

9. Bukhari S, Goodacre BJ, AlHelal A, Kattadiyil MT, Richardson PM. Three-dimensional printing in contemporary fixed prosthodontics: A technique article. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:530-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.008
PMid:28888410

 

10. Javaid M, Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A literature-based review. J oral Biol craniofacial Res. 2019;9:179-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004
PMid:31049281 PMCid:PMC6482339

 

11. Mahrous AI, Salama AA, Shabaan AA, Abdou A, Radwan MM. Color stability of two different resin matrix ceramics: randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03364-6
PMid:37710194 PMCid:PMC10503097

 

12. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016;32:54-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018
PMid:26494268

 

13. Oropallo W, Piegl LA. Ten challenges in 3D printing. Eng Comput. 2016;32:135-48.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0407-0

 

14. Li X, Xie B, Jin J, Chai Y, Chen Y. 3D printing temporary crown and bridge by temperature controlled mask image projection stereolithography. Procedia Manuf. 2018;26:1023-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.134

 

15. Kadry H, Wadnap S, Xu C, Ahsan F. Digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printing technology and photoreactive polymers in fabrication of modified-release tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci Off J Eur Fed Pharm Sci. 2019;135:60-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.05.008
PMid:31108205

 

16. Osman RB, van der Veen AJ, Huiberts D, Wismeijer D, Alharbi N. 3D-printing zirconia implants; a dream or a reality? An in-vitro study evaluating the dimensional accuracy, surface topography and mechanical properties of printed zirconia implant and discs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;75:521-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.018
PMid:28846981

 

17. Prechtel A, Stawarczyk B, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Reymus M. Fracture load of 3D printed PEEK inlays compared with milled ones, direct resin composite fillings, and sound teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:3457-66.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03216-5
PMid:31989370

 

18. Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:285-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.012
PMid:30017167

 

19. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CHF. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1669-77.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0670-4
PMid:22209963

 

20. Alharbi N, Alharbi S, Cuijpers VMJI, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:218-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.09.002
PMid:29032176

 

21. Yildirim B. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:476.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.014
PMid:32451142

 

22. Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:760-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002
PMid:26803175

 

23. Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas S-O, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent Off J Eur Acad Esthet Dent. 2009;4:278-92.

PMid:19704928

 

24. Park G-S, Kim S-K, Heo S-J, Koak J-Y, Seo D-G. Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics. Mater (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;12:2533.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162533
PMid:31395801 PMCid:PMC6720497

 

25. Krasanaki M-E, Pelekanos S, Andreiotelli M, Koutayas S-O, Eliades G. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the influence of two preparation types on marginal fit of CAD/CAM alumina copings: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:170-2.

PMid:22371840

 

26. Algamaiah H, Sampaio CS, Rigo LC, Janal MN, Giannini M, Bonfante EA, et al. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Volumetric Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Composites in Class II Cavities. J Esthet Restor Dent Off Publ Am Acad Esthet Dent. 2017;29:118-27.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12275
PMid:27925387

 

27. Rizonaki M, Jacquet W, Bottenberg P, Depla L, Boone M, De Coster PJ. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:890-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.027
PMid:33541816

 

28. Shim JS, Kim J-E, Jeong SH, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:468-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034
PMid:31810611

 

29. Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Biaggini F, Farronato D, Lerner H. Accuracy of 6 Desktop 3D Printers in Dentistry: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020;28:75-85.

PMid:32347671

 

30. Unkovskiy A, Bui PH-B, Schille C, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Huettig F, Spintzyk S. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. Dent Mater. 2018;34:e324-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.011
PMid:30293688

 

31. Diken Turksayar AA, Donmez MB, Olcay EO, Demirel M, Demir E. Effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of additively manufactured 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses after aging. J Dent. 2022;124:104155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104155
PMid:35526752

 

32. Mendes-Felipe C, Patrocinio D, Laza JM, Ruiz-Rubio L, Vilas-Vilela JL. Evaluation of postcuring process on the thermal and mechanical properties of the Clear02TM resin used in stereolithography. Polym Test. 2018;72:115-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.018

 

33. Reymus M, Lümkemann N, Stawarczyk B. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22:231-7.

PMid:31463487

 

34. Della Bona A, Cantelli V, Britto VT, Collares KF, Stansbury JW. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2021;37:336-50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.030
PMid:33353734 PMCid:PMC7855936

 

35. Cho HS, Park WS, Choi BW, Leu M-C. Determining optimal parameters for stereolithography processes via genetic algorithm. J Manuf Syst. 2000;19:18-27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(00)88887-1

 

36. Arnold C, Monsees D, Hey J, Schweyen R. Surface Quality of 3D-Printed Models as a Function of Various Printing Parameters. Mater (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;12:1970.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121970
PMid:31248083 PMCid:PMC6631072

 

37. Ide Y, Nayar S, Logan H, Gallagher B, Wolfaardt J. The effect of the angle of acuteness of additive manufactured models and the direction of printing on the dimensional fidelity: clinical implications. Odontology. 2017;105:108-15.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0239-4
PMid:26995273

 

38. Revilla-León M, Özcan M. Additive Manufacturing Technologies Used for Processing Polymers: Current Status and Potential Application in Prosthetic Dentistry. J Prosthodont Off J Am Coll Prosthodont. 2019;28:146-58.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12801
PMid:29682823

 

39. Wu D, Zhao Z, Zhang Q, Qi HJ, Fang D. Mechanics of shape distortion of DLP 3D printed structures during UV post-curing. Soft Matter. 2019;15:6151-9.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM00725C
PMid:31317163

 

40. Atria PJ, Sampaio CS, Cáceres E, Fernández J, Reis AF, Giannini M, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of volumetric polymerization shrinkage and degree of conversion of composites cured by various light power outputs. Dent Mater J. 2018;37:33-9.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-430
PMid:29081446