Vidal GCF, Balbino EPB, Oliveira JMS, dos Santos NB, Lôbo TLGF, do Nascimento TG, de Freitas JD, de Freitas JMD, Porto ICCM. Effect of Brazilian red propolis on microtensile bond strength and sealing ability of the methacrylate-based bonding agents. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(6):e665-74.

doi:10.4317/jced.62587

___

References

1. Perdigão J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion - not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56:190-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004 PMid:34188727 PMCid:PMC8216299

2. Zhou W, Liu S, Zhou X, Hannig M, Rupf S, Feng J, et al. Modifying adhesive materials to improve the longevity of resinous restorations. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:723. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030723 PMid:30744026 PMCid:PMC6387348

3. Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent. 2002;27:117-23. PMid:11931133

4. Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, Benetti A. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity. Dent Mater. 2019;35:335-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.027 PMid:30527586

5. Zotti F, Falavigna E, Capocasale G, De Santis D, Albanese M. Microleakage of direct restorations-comparisonbetween bulk-fill and traditional composite resins: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Dent. 2021;15:755-67. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724155 PMid:34450679 PMCid:PMC8630972

6. Alomari QD, Barrieshi-Nusair K, Ali M. Effect of C-factor and LED curing mode on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Eur J Dent. 2011;5:400-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698912 PMid:21912498 PMCid:PMC3170026

7. Atoui JA, Chinelatti MA, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SAM. Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:421-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400017 PMid:20835580 PMCid:PMC5349067

8. Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, Borchers L, Geurtsen W, Günay H. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching. Oper Dent. 2008;33:155-62. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-63 PMid:18435189

9. Mousavinasab SM, Atai M, Alavi B. To compare the microleakage among experimental adhesives containing nanoclay fillers after the storages of 24 hours and 6 months. Open Dent J. 2011;5:52-7. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010052 PMid:21566692 PMCid:PMC3091289

10. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:7-10. PMid:17432395

11. Porto ICCM, Rocha ABB, Ferreira IIS, de Barros BM, Ávila EC, da Silva MC, et al, Polyphenols and Brazilian red propolis incorporated into a total-etching adhesive system help in maintaining bonding durability. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06237 PMid:33665421 PMCid:PMC7898005

12. Kimyai S, Mehdipour M, Savadi Oskoee S, Alizadeh Oskoee P, Abbaszadeh A. Reasons for retreatment of amalgam and composite restorations among the patients referring to Tabriz faculty of dentistry. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007;1:27-31. PMid:23277830 PMCid:PMC3522906

13. Porto ICCM, Almeida DCC, Costa GVCO, Donato TSS, Nunes LM, Nascimento TG, et al. Mechanical and aesthetics compatibility of Brazilian red propolis micellar nanocomposite as a cavity cleaning agent. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2281-y PMid:30021632 PMCid:PMC6052596

14. Chen CL, Parolia A, Pau A, Porto ICCM. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of desensitizing agents in dentine tubule occlusion using scanning electron microscopy. Aust Dent J. 2015;60:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12275 PMid:25721280

15. Zulhendri F, Felitti R, Fearnley J, Ravalia M. The use of propolis in dentistry, oral health, and medicine: A review. J Oral Biosci. 2021;63:23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.job.2021.01.001 PMid:33465498

16. Kale Y, Yadav S, Dadpe M, Dahake P, Kendre S. Bioinductive and anti-inflammatory properties of propolis and Biodentine on SHED. Saudi Dent J. 2022;34:544-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.009 PMid:36267530 PMCid:PMC9577971

17. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012;28:72-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011 PMid:22192252 PMCid:PMC3863938

18. Porto ICCMP; Lôbo TLGF; Rodrigues RF, Lins RBE, Silva MAB. Insight into the development of versatile dentin bonding agents to increase the durability of the bonding interface. Front Dent Med. 2023:4:1127368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2023.1127368 PMid:39916922 PMCid:PMC11797806

19. Mendonça ICG, Porto ICCM, Nascimento TG, Souza NS, Oliveira JM, Arruda RE, et al. Brazilian red propolis: phytochemical screening, antioxidant activity and effect against cancer cells. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:357. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0888-9 PMid:26467757 PMCid:PMC4604764

20. Nascimento TG, Arruda RES, Almeida ETC, Oliveira JMS, Basílio-Júnior ID, Porto ICCM, et al. Comprehensive multivariate correlations between climatic effect, metabolite-profile, antioxidant capacity and antibacterial activity of Brazilian red propolis metabolites during seasonal study. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54591-3 PMid:31797960 PMCid:PMC6893030

21. Bhavani GD, Rathod T, Parveen N, Tirupathi P, Dharavattu P, Sekhar V, et al. Assessment of the antimicrobial effectiveness of herbal root canal irrigants (Propolis, Triphala, and Aloe Vera) and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus Faecalis. Cureus. 2023;15:e41628. PMid:37565091 PMCid:PMC10410603

22. Santos FF, Morais-Urano RP, Cunha WR, Almeida SG, Cavallari PSDSR, Manuquian HA, et al. A review on the anti-inflammatory activities of Brazilian green, brown and red propolis. J Food Biochem. 2022;46:e14350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.14350 PMid:35880944

23. Calabriso N, Massaro M, Scoditti E, Pellegrino M, Ingrosso I, Giovinazzo G, et al. Red grape skin polyphenols blunt matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 activity and expression in cell models of vascular inflammation: protective role in degenerative and inflammatory diseases. Molecules. 2016;21:1147. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091147 PMid:27589705 PMCid:PMC6274050

24. Mondal S, Rahaman ST. Flavonoids: a vital resource in healthcare and medicine. Pharm Pharmacol Int J. 2020;8:91-104. https://doi.org/10.15406/ppij.2020.08.00285

25. Neri JR, Yamauti M, Silveira FD, Mendonça JS, de Carvalho RM, Santiago SL. Influence of dentin biomodification with epigallocatechin-3-gallate on the bond strength of self-etch adhesive: twelve-month results. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;71:81-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.08.007

26. Zhang SC, Kern M. The role of host-derived dentinal matrix metalloproteinases in reducing dentin bonding of resin adhesives. Int J Oral Sci. 2009;1:163-76. https://doi.org/10.4248/IJOS.09044 PMid:20690420 PMCid:PMC3470104

27. Mazzoni A, Tjäderhane L, Checchi V, Di Lenarda R, Salo T, Tay FR, et al. Role of dentin MMPs in caries progression and bond stability. J Dent Res. 2015;94:241-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514562833 PMid:25535202 PMCid:PMC4300303

28. Parolia A, Kundabala M, Rao NN, Acharya SR, Agrawal P, Mohan M, et al. Comparative histological analysis of human pulp following direct pulp capping with propolis, mineral trioxide aggregate and Dycal. Aust Dent J. 2010;55:59-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01179.x PMid:20415913

29. Nasri Z, Jahromi MZ, Aminzadeh A. Clinical and histological response of human pulp tissue to direct pulp capping with mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine and propolis. Dent Res J. (Isfahan) 2022;19:40. eCollection 2022. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.344163 PMid:35669602 PMCid:PMC9164666

30. Maltz M, Jardim JJ, Alves LS. Chapter 9.3: Current concepts of caries removal in daily practice. Monogr Oral Sci. 2023;31:172-87. https://doi.org/10.1159/000530613 PMid:37364562

31. Lenzi TL, Guglielmi CAB, Arana-Chavez VE, Raggio DP. Tubule density and diameter in coronal dentin from primary and permanent human teeth. Microsc Microanal. 2013;19:1445-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927613012725 PMid:23947480

32. Alhenaki AM, Attar EA, Alshahrani A, Farooq I, Vohra F, Abduljabbar T. Dentin bond integrity of filled and unfilled resin adhesive enhanced with silica nanoparticles-An SEM, EDX, Micro-Raman, FTIR and micro-tensile bond strength study. Polymers. (Basel) 2021;13:1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071093 PMid:33808159 PMCid:PMC8037508

33. Kim JS, Cho BH, Lee IB, Um CM, Lim BS, Oh MH, et al. Effect of the hydrophilic nanofiller loading on the mechanical properties and the microtensile bond strength of an ethanol-based one-bottle dentin adhesive. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;72:284-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30153 PMid:15484258

34. Rudawska A, Worzakowska M, Bociąga E, Olewnik-Kruszkowska E. Investigation of selected properties of adhesive compositions based on epoxy resins. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;92:22-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.008

35. Marques AC, Mocanu A, Tomić NZ, Balos S, Stammen E, Lundevall A, et al. Review on adhesives and surface treatments for structural applications: recent developments on sustainability and implementation for metal and composite substrates. Materials. (Basel) 2020;13:5590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245590 PMid:33302442 PMCid:PMC7763528

36. Gré CP, Andrada MAC, Monteiro Júnior S. Microtensile bond strength of a universal adhesive to deep dentin. Braz Dent Sci. 2016;19:104-10. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1259

37. Schoenhals GP, Berft CL, Naufel FS, Schmitt VL, Chaves LP. Bond strength assessment of a universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2019;48:e20190083. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.08319

38. Dutra DJ, Branco NT, Alvim HH, Magalhães CS, Oliveira RR, Moreira AN. Bond strength of two universal adhesive systems to human dentin using different strategies. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022;35:155-63. https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/3/155 PMid:36748733 PMCid:PMC10283391

39. Guzman-Armstrong S, Armstrong SR, Qian F. Relationship between nanoleakage and microtensile bond strength at the resin-dentin interface. Oper Dent. 2003;28:60-6. PMid:12540120

40. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011;39:643-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.004 PMid:21801799

41. Totiam P, González-Cabezas C, Fontana MR, Zero DT. A new in vitro model to study the relationship of gap size and secondary caries. Caries Res. 2007;41:467-73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107934 PMid:17827964

42. Borouziniat A, Khaki H, Majidinia S. Retrospective evaluation of the clinical performance of direct composite restorations using the snow-plow technique: Up to 4 years follow-up. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11:e964-e968. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55639 PMid:31700568 PMCid:PMC6825734

43. AlHabdan AA. Review of microleakage evaluation tools. J Int Oral Health. 2017;9:141-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_160_17

44. Heintze SD, Thunpithayakul C, Armstrong SR, Rousson V. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater. 2011;27:114-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.005 PMid:20947156

45. de Almeida JB, Platt JA, Oshida Y, Moore BK, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ. Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28:453-60. PMid:12877432

46. Ashwini KS, Devadiga D, Hegde MN. Evaluation of microleakage of four root canal sealers - a fluorescent microscope study. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020;9:3800-5. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/833

47. Hui LE, Thomas MS, Jathanna V, Lewis AJ, Srikant N. Effect of caries detecting dye on microleakage of composite resin restorations bonded with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems. J Clin Diag Res. 2019;13: ZC01-ZC03. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40514.12827

48. Patanjali S, Arora A, Arya A, Grewal MS. An in vitro study of effect of beveling of enamel on microleakage and shear bond strength of adhesive systems in primary and permanent teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12:205-10. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1623 PMid:31708616 PMCid:PMC6811944

49. Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta PK, Tejolatha B, Lakhani AA, Tiwari R, et al. Evaluation of microleakage with total etch, self-etch and universal adhesive systems in Class V restorations: An in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC53-ZC56. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24907.9680 PMid:28571262 PMCid:PMC5449918

50. Jain K, Katge F, Poojari M, Shetty S, Patil D, Ghadge S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of bioactive, ormocer, and conventional GIC restorative materials in primary molars: an in vitro study microleakage of three restorative materials. Int J Dent. 2022;2022: 7932930. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7932930 PMid:35310459 PMCid:PMC8933070

51. Emir F, Ayyildiz S, Sahin C. What is the changing frequency of diamond burs? J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10:93-100. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.93 PMid:29713429 PMCid:PMC5917112

52. Porto ICCM, Correia JC, Silva Filho SB. Microscopic changes on morphology of diamond coated dental burs as consequence of multiple uses. Indian J Rest Dent. 2014;3:62-71.