Freire JOA, Zavanelli AC, Mazaro JVQ, Zavanelli RA, de Alexandre RS, Neto OMS. Advances and Challenges in the Integration of Digital Technologies in Complete Dentures: A Narrative Literature Review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(5):e587-93.

doi:10.4317/jced.62598

___

References

1. Nascimento GG, Alves-Costa S, Romandini M. Burden of severe periodontitis and edentulism in 2021, with projections up to 2050: The Global Burden of Disease 2021 study. J Periodontal Res. 2024;59(5):823-867. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13337 PMid:39192495

2. Rao S, Chowdhary R, Mahoorkar S. A systematic review of impression technique for conventional complete denture. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(2):105-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0020-2 PMid:21629453 PMCid:PMC3081259

3. Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(6):361-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60318-2 PMid:23763779

4. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137 Suppl:7S-13S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0398 PMid:16950932

5. Revilla-León M, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J, Barmak AB, Agustín-Panadero R, Fernández-Estevan L, Gómez-Polo M. Accuracy of intraoral scanner systems for fabricating inlay, onlay, and veneer restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13361 PMid:39663747

6. Kang YJ, Oh KC, Kim GY, Moon HS. Comparative evaluation of digitally fabricated complete dentures versus conventional complete dentures: A randomized, single-blinded, cross-over clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(2):408-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.013 PMid:36096912

7. Kouveliotis G, Tasopoulos T, Karoussis I, Silva NR, Zoidis P. Complete denture digital workflow: Combining basic principles with a CAD-CAM approach. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(4):550-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.024 PMid:33549339

8. Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: support. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49(3):306-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90267-6 PMid:6341544

9. DE VANSCOTT ER, BOUCHER LJ. The nature of supporting tissues for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1965 Mar-Apr;15:285-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(65)90099-5 PMid:14267318

10. Klein IE, Broner AS. Complete denture secondary impression technique to minimize distortion of ridge and border tissues. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54(5):660-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90245-8 PMid:3903136

11. Srivastava G, Padhiary SK, Mohanty N, Molinero-Mourelle P, Chebib N. Accuracy of intraoral scanner for recording completely edentulous arches-a systematic review. Dent J (Basel). 2023;11(10):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11100241 PMid:37886926 PMCid:PMC10605168

12. Murray MD, Darvell BW. The evolution of the complete denture base. Theories of complete denture retention-a review. Part 2. Aust Dent J. 1993;38(4):299-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb05502.x PMid:8216040

13. Bhambhani R, Joshi S, Roy SS, Shinghvi A. Choosing the denture occlusion - A Systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(3):269-277. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_409_19 PMid:33223696 PMCid:PMC7654203

14. Borges MHR, Miranda LFB, Dini C, Marañón-Vásquez GA, Magno MB, Maia LC, et al. Clinical performance of and patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures with different occlusal schemes: A systematic review of systematic reviews. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(3):341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.018 PMid:34991859

15. Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Gomes JML, Santiago Júnior JF, Moraes SLD, Pellizzer EP. Bilateral balanced occlusion compared to other occlusal schemes in complete dentures: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(4):344-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12607 PMid:29314199

16. Zhao K, Mai QQ, Wang XD, Yang W, Zhao L. Occlusal designs on masticatory ability and patient satisfaction with complete denture: a systematic review. J Dent. 2013;41(11):1036-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.016 PMid:23911601

17. Maeda Y, Minoura M, Tsutsumi S, Okada M, Nokubi T. A CAD/CAM system for removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7(1):17-21. PMid:8179777

18. Mai HN, Lee DH. A digital technique to replicate edentulous arches with functional borders and accurate maxillomandibular relationship for digital complete denture. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(4):356-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13154 PMid:32065473

19. Lo Russo L, Salamini A. Single-arch digital removable complete denture: A workflow that starts from the intraoral scan. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(1):20-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.004 PMid:29195814

20. Al Hamad KQ, Al-Kaff FT. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(1):26-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13597 PMid:35997079

21. Lo Russo L, Salamini A, Troiano G, Guida L. Digital dentures: A protocol based on intraoral scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(4):597-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.006 PMid:32331785

22. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Using intraoral scanning to capture complete denture impressions, tooth positions, and centric relation records. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(4):377-381. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5741 PMid:29624629

23. Bidra AS, Farrell K, Burnham D, Dhingra A, Taylor TD, Kuo CL. Prospective cohort pilot study of 2-visit CAD/CAM monolithic complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: Clinical and patient-centered outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(5):578-586.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.023 PMid:26794695

24. Bento VAA, Gomes JML, Oliveira-Limirio JPJ, Rosa CDDRD, Lemos CAA, Santos DM, et al. Effect of aging on the mechanical properties of cad/cam-milled and 3d-printed acrylic resins for denture bases. Int J Prosthodont. 2024;37(7):5-11. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8376 PMid:38381998

25. Thu KM, Molinero-Mourelle P, Yeung AWK, Abou-Ayash S, Lam WYH. Which clinical and laboratory procedures should be used to fabricate digital complete dentures? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(5):922-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.027 PMid:37689573

26. Srinivasan M, Kamnoedboon P, McKenna G, Angst L, Schimmel M, Özcan M, et al. CAD-CAM removable complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes. J Dent. 2021;113:103777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103777 PMid:34400250

27. Cristache CM, Totu EE, Iorgulescu G, Pantazi A, Dorobantu D, Nechifor AC, et al. Eighteen months follow-up with patient-centered outcomes assessment of complete dentures manufactured using a hybrid nanocomposite and additive cad/cam protocol. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020324 PMid:31979345 PMCid:PMC7073708

28. Lo Russo L, Di Gioia C, Salamini A, Guida L. Integrating intraoral, perioral, and facial scans into the design of digital dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(4):584-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.030 PMid:31326147

29. Abdulkarim LI, Alharamlah FSS, Abubshait RM, Alotaibi DA, Abouonq AO. Impact of digital workflow integration on fixed prosthodontics: a review of advances and clinical outcomes. cureus. 2024;16(10):e72286. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72286

30. Joensahakij N, Serichetaphongse P, Chengprapakorn W. The accuracy of conventional versus digital (intraoral scanner or photogrammetry) impression techniques in full-arch implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review. Evid Based Dent. 2024;25(4):216-217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01045-z PMid:39134687

31. Pesce P, Nicolini P, Caponio VCA, Zecca PA, Canullo L, Isola G, et al. Accuracy of full-arch intraoral scans versus conventional impression: A systematic review with a meta-analysis and a proposal to standardise the analysis of the accuracy. J Clin Med. 2024;14(1):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010071 PMid:39797155 PMCid:PMC11721843

32. Chebib N, Imamura Y, El Osta N, Srinivasan M, Müller F, Maniewicz S. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(4):618-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.004 PMid:36055812

33. Wang C, Shi YF, Xie PJ, Wu JH. Accuracy of digital complete dentures: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(2):249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.004 PMid:32115218

34. Chappuis Chocano AP, Venante HS, Bringel da Costa RM, Pordeus MD, Santiago Junior JF, Porto VC. Evaluation of the clinical performance of dentures manufactured by computer-aided technology and conventional techniques: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(4):547-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.029 PMid:34332774

35. de Oliveira Limírio JPJ, Gomes JML, Alves Rezende MCR, Lemos CAA, Rosa CDDRD, Pellizzer EP. Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base: Conventional versus CAD-CAM resin - A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(6):1221-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.018 PMid:34030891

36. Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A. An update on computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review on clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(4):478-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.017 PMid:27881317

37. Zandinejad A, Floriani F, Lin WS, Naimi-Akbar A. Clinical outcomes of milled, 3D-printed, and conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(8):736-747 https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13859 PMid:38666691

38. Avelino MEL, Costa RTF, Vila-Nova TEL, Vasconcelos BCDE, Pellizzer EP, Moraes SLD. Clinical performance and patient-related outcome measures of digitally fabricated complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(4):748.e1-748.e10. PMid:38485595

39. de Oliveira E, Zancanaro de Figueiredo E, Spohr AM, Lima Grossi M. Properties of Acrylic Resin For CAD/CAM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(8):656-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13394 PMid:34036676

40. Charoenphol K, Peampring C. Fit accuracy of complete denture base fabricated by cad/cam milling and 3d-printing methods. Eur J Dent. 2023;17(3):889-894. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757211 PMid:36513334 PMCid:PMC10569868

41. Jafarpour D, Haricharan PB, de Souza RF. CAD/CAM versus traditional complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient- and clinician-reported outcomes and costs. J Oral Rehabil. 2024;51(9):1911-1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13738 PMid:38797954