Quintana EEV,
Nima G, Mezzomo LA, Noriega J, Gallardo YNR. Accuracy of four intraoral
scanning devices and the effect of three different illuminance conditions. J
Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(12):e1516-23.
doi:10.4317/jced.62602
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62602
___
References
|
1.
Revilla-Leon M, Frazier K, da Costa JB, Kumar P, Duong ML, Khajotia S, et al.
Intraoral scanners: an American Dental Association Clinical Evaluators Panel
survey. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021;152(8):669-70. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
2.
Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of
influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26(3):101-21. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
3.
Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, et al.
Digital vs conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(8):660-78. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
4.
Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent in dental
optics - part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers
Eng. 2014;54:203-21. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
5.
Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus
conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont.
2018;27(1):35-41. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
6.
Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Laganá DC, Sesma N. Patient
outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional
impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(2):214-19. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
7.
Nikoyan L, Patel R. Intraoral scanner, three-dimensional imaging, and
three-dimensional printing in the dental office. Dent Clin North Am.
2020;64(2):365-78. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
8.
Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J
Prosthodont. 2015;24(4):313-21. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
9.
Jacob HB, Wyatt GD, Buschang PH. Reliability and validity of intraoral and
extraoral scanners. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:38. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
10.
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, Barmak AB, Özcan M, Att W, et al.
Artificial intelligence applications in restorative dentistry: a systematic
review. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(5):867-75. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
11.
Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions
using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(6):755-61. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
12.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al.
Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J
Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:1-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
13.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5725-1. Accuracy
(trueness and precision) of measuring methods and results. Part I: General
principles and definitions. Berlin: International Organization for
Standardization; 1994. Available from:
https://www.iso.org/standard/11833.html |
||||
|
|
||||
|
14.
International Organization of Standardization. ISO 12836. Dentistry- Digitizing
devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations- Test methods
for assessing accuracy. Geneva: ISO; 2015. Available from:
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:12836:ed-2:v1:en |
||||
|
|
||||
|
15.
Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan
M, et al. Intraoral digital scans-part 1: influence of ambient scanning light
conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral
scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(3):372-78. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
16.
Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A,
Zeller E, et al. Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the
accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner: a pilot study. J
Prosthodont. 2021;30(5):408-13. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
17.
Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Myung JY. Comparison of digital intraoral
scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(2):225-32. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
18.
Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness
and precision. J Vis Exp. 2014;(86):51374. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
19.
Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O. Accuracy of digital and
conventional orthodontic workflows for full-arch models. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(6):1178-87. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
20.
Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardó A, Camps AI. Accuracy of four digital
scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions. PLoS
One. 2018;13(9):e0202916. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
21.
Kim JE, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Shin Y. Changes in the accuracy of digital
impressions depending on ambient light. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(4):347-52. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
22.
Al Hamad KQ, Al-Shaikhli S, Habib SR. Effect of ambient light and scan time
on the accuracy of intraoral scans: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health.
2021;21(1):58. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
23.
Vág J, Kovács A, Mennan C, Borbély J, Hermann P, Kivovics P. Evaluation of
the effect of different ambient light conditions on the trueness of two
intraoral scanners. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):320. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
24.
Mühlemann S, Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I, Thieringer
FM. Influence of ambient light on the accuracy of intraoral scans: an in
vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(5):798-804. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
25.
Aragón ML, Pontes LF, Bichara LM, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Validity and
reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional impressions: a
systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(4):631-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
26.
Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility
of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res.
2017;61(4):450-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
27.
Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Savio G, Sivolella S, Katsoulis J, Vigolo P. Full
arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental
prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res.
2019;63(4):396-403. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
28.
Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A, Sumi Y, Fuchigami K, et al. Effects of
ambient light on shade matching using intraoral scanning and 3D printing. J
Prosthodont Res. 2019;63(3):327-33. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
29.
Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, et al.
Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based
on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):36-42. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
30.
Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital
models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig.
2013;17(4):1201-8. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
31.
Hack GD, Patzelt SBM. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning
devices: an in vitro investigation. ADA Prof Prod Rev. 2015;10(4):1-5. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
32.
Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsky E, Mangano C. Trueness and
precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in
vitro study. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163107. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
33.
Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch
impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent.
2019;22(1):11-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
34.
Güth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of
five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral
Investig. 2017;21(5):1445-55. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
35.
Çakmak G, Yilmaz H, Yilmaz B. In vitro comparison of complete-arch implant
impression methods. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(4):927-36. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
36.
Rutkunas V, Geciauskaite A, Jegelevicius D, Vaitiekunas M. Accuracy of
digital implant impressions with different scanning devices: an in vitro
study. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(3):236-42. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
37.
Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and
accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous
mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(3):186-94. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
38.
Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C.
Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):184-90. |
||||