Varghese RM, Mathew AG, Kishore S, Thomas LR, Mohan R. Comparative Analysis of Enamel Surface Integrity and Pulpal Temperature in Debonding Metallic Brackets: A Study of Two Intensity Levels of Diode Laser Versus Conventional Method. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(6):e713-7.

doi:10.4317/jced.62738

___

References

1. Mousa MM, Al-Jannan HMG, Sultan K, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Manadili A, et al. Effectiveness of Two Intensity Levels of Diode Laser in Debonding Metallic Brackets Regarding Enamel Surface Integrity and Pulpal Temperature: An Ex-Vivo Study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41372. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41372 PMid:37408936 PMCid:PMC10319451

2. Yassaei S, Soleimanian A, Nik ZE. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(4):270-4. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1674 PMid:26067728

3. Grzech-Leśniak K, Matys J, Żmuda-Stawowiak D, Mroczka K, Dominiak M, Brugnera Junior A, et al. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(11):595-600. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4412 PMid:29905504

4. Ahrari F, Heravi F, Fekrazad R, Farzanegan F, Nakhaei S. Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets? Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(3):567-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0933-y PMid:21667137

5. Abdulaziz A, El-Kholy MM, Bushra SS, Ali SM, Shehab KA. Performance of two laser motion modes versus conventional orthodontic ceramic brackets debonding technique on enamel surface topography. Lasers Med Sci. 2024;39(1):156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04097-w PMid:38869676

6. Knaup T, Korbmacher-Steiner H, Braun A, Wenzler JS, Knaup I, Stein S. Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Metallic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength and Enamel Surface Morphology. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020;38(3):160-166. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4704 PMid:32195639

7. Heravi F, Rashed R, Raziee L. The effects of bracket removal on enamel. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24(2):110-5. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2008-0016 PMid:19113075

8. Stein S, Hellak A, Schauseil M, Korbmacher-Steiner H, Braun A. Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Self-Ligating Ceramic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(1):31-36. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4314 PMid:29016236

9. Nasiri M, Mirhashemi AH, Etemadi A, Kharazifard MJ, Borujeni ES, Mahd MJ, et al. Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index in Debonding of Stainless Steel Brackets Assisted with Nd:YAG Laser Irradiation. Front Dent. 2019;16(1):37-44. https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i1.1107

10. Dalaie K, Fatemi SM, Behnaz M, Ghaffari S, Hemmatian S, Soltani AD. Effect of different debonding techniques on shear bond strength and enamel cracks in simulated clinical set-ups. J World Fed Orthod. 2020;9(1):18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2019.11.003 PMid:32672663

11. Yassaei S, Aghili H, Ebrahimi-Nik Z. Different modes of diode laser irradiation: effects on enamel surface and intrapulpal temperature at debonding. Laser Ther. 2018;27(3):214-218. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.27_18-OR-20 PMid:32158067 PMCid:PMC7034253

12. Stein S, Kleye A, Schauseil M, Hellak A, Korbmacher-Steiner H, Braun A. 445-nm diode laser-assisted debonding of self-ligating ceramic brackets. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2017;62(5):513-520. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2016-0027 PMid:28076292

13. Lai RF, Wang HY, Chen T, Liu XN. Pulsed Nd:YAG laser-aided debonding for removing the metal brackets. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010;45(7):407-10. PMID: 21122432. PMid:21122432

14. Tehranchi A, Fekrazad R, Zafar M, Eslami B, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N. Evaluation of the effects of CO(2) laser on debonding of orthodontic porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(5):563-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0820-y PMid:20725757

15. Doddavarapu SKB, Singaraju GS, Yamini Priyanka JS, Vivek Reddy G, Mandava P. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e31661. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31661 PMid:36420047 PMCid:PMC9678478

16. Kumar AA, Jain RK, Aravind TRP. In vivo comparative assessment of bracket bond failure rates of single-component adhesives. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024;14(2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_44_23 PMid:38827357 PMCid:PMC11141899

17. Rajamanickam P, Ramasamy N. Effects of Ultrasonic Instrumentation on the Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Advanced Oral Research. 2023;14(1):81-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068231166507

18. Ramsundar K, Jain RK, Balakrishnan N, Vikramsimha B. Comparative evaluation of bracket bond failure rates of a novel non-primer adhesive with a conventional primer-based orthodontic adhesive - a pilot study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023;17(1):35-39. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.36953 PMid:37650021 PMCid:PMC10462921

19. Ramsundar K, Jain RK, Balakrishnan N, Vikramsimha B. Comparative evaluation of bracket bond failure rates of a novel non-primer adhesive with a conventional primer-based orthodontic adhesive - a pilot study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023;17(1):35-39. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.36953 PMid:37650021 PMCid:PMC10462921

20. Havisha Nookala and Ravindra Kumar Jain, Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Cytotoxicity. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2024;18(10): ZC71-ZC76. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/72999.20179