Hamouda ME, Harp YS, Elembaby AE. Evaluation of Microleakage and Micromorphological Analysis of Different Self-Adhesive Restorative Systems in Class V Cavities: Laboratory Study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(7):e805-15.

doi:10.4317/jced.62843

___

References

1. Bollu IP, Hari A, Thumu J, Velagula LD, Bolla N, Varri S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage Between Nano-Ionomer, Giomer and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Cavities- CLSM Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:66-70. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/18730.7798 PMid:27437363 PMCid:PMC4948539

2. Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Dionysopoulos P, Koumpia E. In vivo evaluation of microleakage from composites with new dentine adhesives. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:1014-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01323.x PMid:15387843

3. Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta PK, Tejolatha B, Lakhani AA, Tiwari R, et al. Evaluation of Microleakage with Total Etch, Self-Etch and Universal Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations: An in vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:53-6. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24907.9680 PMid:28571262 PMCid:PMC5449918

4. Eronat N, Yilmaz E, Kara N, Ak AT. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:450-55. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143615 PMid:25512723 PMCid:PMC4253098

5. Hasani Z, Khodadadi E, Ezoji F, Khafri S. Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage of Restorative Glass Ionomers Compared to Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities. Front Dent. 2019;16:136-43. https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i2.1365 PMid:31777855 PMCid:PMC6874843

6. Delgado AJ, Ritter AV, Donovan TE, et al. Effect of Finishing Techniques on the Marginal Integrity of Resin-Based Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:184-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12140 PMid:26177046

7. Battancs E, Sáry T, Molnár J, Braunitzer G, Skolnikovics M, Schindler Á, et al. Fracture Resistance and Microleakage around Direct Restorations in High C-Factor Cavities. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14:3463. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173463 PMid:36080538 PMCid:PMC9460406

8. Celik EU, Tunac AT, Yilmaz F. Three-year clinical evaluation of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(3):1473-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2575-y PMid:30120605

9. Jordehi AY, Shahabi MS, Akbari A. Comparison of self-adhering flowable composite microleakage with several types of bonding agent in class V cavity restoration. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16:257-63. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.261129 PMid:31303881

10. Francois P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal JP, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. J Oral Sci. 2021;63:139-44. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.20-0448 PMid:33597335

11. Diwanji A, Dhar V, Arora R, Madhusudan A, Rathore AS. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5:373-77. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.136193 PMid:25097418 PMCid:PMC4121918

12. Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal JP, Dursun E. Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification. Mater (Basel). 2020;13:2313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102313 PMid:32443424 PMCid:PMC7287768

13. Dennis D, Lingam ST. Microleakage Evaluation Among Giomer, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Composite in Class V cavities: An In-Vitro study. Int J Clin Dent. 2021;13:398-404.

14. Venugopal K, Krishnaprasad L, V P PS, Ravi AB, Haridas K, Soman D. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13:132-36. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_609_20 PMid:34447061 PMCid:PMC8375940

15. David C, Cardoso de Cardoso G, Isolan CP, Piva E, Moraes RR, Cuevas-Suarez CE. Bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite resins to dental tissues: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128:876-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.020 PMid:33838916

16. Dennis D, Aswal D, Anastasia. The Effect of Microleakage in Class V Cavity Using Self-Adhering Flowable Composite with The Addition of Acid Etch. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2017;6:1276-80. https://doi.org/10.14260/Jemds/2017/277

17. Kumar AA, de Ataide IN, Fernandes M. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of two self-adhesive flowable composites following various restorative techniques in Class V lesions: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24:508-13. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_268_21 PMid:35399772 PMCid:PMC8989174

18. Abuljadayel R, Aljadani N, Almutairi H, Turkistani A. Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15:2612. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122612 PMid:37376257 PMCid:PMC10300955

19. Ellithy MS, Abdelrahman MH, Afifi RR. Comparative clinical evaluation between self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill composites in class II cavities: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(9):1311-1325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13242 PMid:38655672

20. Yao C, Ahmed MH, Okazaki Y, Van Landuyt KL, Huang C, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding Efficacy of a New Self-Adhesive Restorative onto Flat Dentin Vs Class-I Cavity-bottom Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:65-77. PMid:32030377

21. Ebaya MM, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13:599-606. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401435 PMid:31891976 PMCid:PMC6938416

22. Kumari A, Singh N. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials. Biomater Investig Dent. 2022;9:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2033623 PMid:35174335 PMCid:PMC8843194

23. Motevasselian F, Kermanshah H, Rasoulkhani E, Özcan M. Comparison of microleakage of an alkasite restorative material, a composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer. Braz J Oral Sci. 2021;20:e213981. https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8663981

24. Dennis D, Pintauli S, Debora S. Microleakage Comparative Evaluation of RMGIC and Alkasite with and without Adhesive System in Class V Cavity: An in Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22:735-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3130 PMid:34615776

25. Mahaparale RR, Patil S, Mangala TM, Saraf AA, Pawar A, Dsouza S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Three Different Generation Dentin Bonding Agents and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14: 31-5. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2020/44082.13777

26. Kim HJ. Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength and Microleakage of Three Ion-Releasing Restorative Materials at Various pH Levels. Appl Sci. 2022;12:6796. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136796

27. Habib SI, Yassen AA, Bayoumi RE. Influence of Nanocoats on the Physicomechanical Properties and Microleakage of Bulk-fill and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements: An in Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22:62-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3020 PMid:34002711

28. Singh S, Bhadauria U S, Sharma A. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage with Total-Etch, Universal (Self-Etch Mode), and Nano Adhesive Systems in Class V Composite Restorations: An In-Vitro Study. Cureus. 2023;15: e46766. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46766 PMid:37954744 PMCid:PMC10632741

29. Latta MA, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW. Enamel and Dentin Bond Durability of Self-Adhesive Restorative Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:99-105. PMid:32030380

30. Sibai N, El Mourad A, Al Suhaibani N, Al Ahmadi R, Al Dosary S. Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Resin Composite. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:6280624. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6280624 PMid:35572356 PMCid:PMC9106484

31. Peterson J, Rizk M, Hoch M, Wiegand A. Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite. Odontology. 2018;106:171-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-017-0324-3 PMid:29243187

32. Park KJ, Schneider H, Haak R. Assessment of defects at tooth/self-adhering flowable composite interface using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Dent Mater. 2015;31:534-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.005 PMid:25735759

33. Yao C, Ahmed MH, Zhang F, Mercelis B, Van Landuyt KL, Huang C, et al. Structural/Chemical Characterization and Bond Strength of a New Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Restorative. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:85-97. PMid:32030379

34. Abouelleil H, Attik N, Chiriac R, Toche F, Ory A, Zayakh A, et al. Comparative study of two bioactive dental materials. Dent Mater. 2024; 40:297-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.11.016 PMid:38007319

35. Latta MA, Radniecki SM. Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Restorative Materials Affected by Smear Layer Thickness but not Dentin Desiccation. J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22:79-84. PMid:22204915