Feitosa APPO, Lemos AC, Luna-Cruz SM, Limoeiro AG, Alcalde MP, Vivan RR, Duarte MAH, Vasconcelos BC. Debris Removal from Mandibular Molars Using Different Irrigation Volumes and Ultrasonic Tips: Micro-CT Study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(8):e891-6.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.62892

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62892

___

 

References

1. Barbosa AFA, Lima CO de, Sassone LM, Fares RD, Fidalgo TK da S, Silva EJNL. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on hard tissue debris removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res. 2021;35:e123.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0123
PMid:34878078

 

2. de Mattos de Araujo BM, Cruz ATG, Piasecki L, Webber M, Carneiro E, Westphalen VPD, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on hard-tissue debris removal from mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(10):6121-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04561-3
PMid:35650363

 

3. Weller RN, Niemczyk SP, Kim S. Incidence and position of the canal isthmus. Part 1. Mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. J Endod. 1995;21(7):380-3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80975-1
PMid:7499980

 

4. Tahmasbi M, Jalali P, Nair MK, Barghan S, Nair UP. Prevalence of Middle Mesial Canals and Isthmi in the Mesial Root of Mandibular Molars: An In Vivo Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1080-3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.008
PMid:28527840

 

5. Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Silva-Sousa YT, Bruniera JFBB, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Ex vivo evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J. 2017;50(4):398-406.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12630
PMid:26992452

 

6. Busanello FH, Petridis X, So MVR, Dijkstra RJB, Sharma PK, van der Sluis LWM. Chemical biofilm removal capacity of endodontic irrigants as a function of biofilm structure: optical coherence tomography, confocal microscopy and viscoelasticity determination as integrated assessment tools. Int Endod J. 2019;52(4):461-74.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13027
PMid:30303560

 

7. Pereira TC, Dijkstra RJB, Petridis X, van der Meer WJ, Sharma PK, de Andrade FB, et al. The influence of time and irrigant refreshment on biofilm removal from lateral morphological features of simulated root canals. Int Endod J. 2020;53(12):1705-14.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13342
PMid:32502284 PMCid:PMC7754391

 

8. Sirtes G, Waltimo T, Schaetzle M, Zehnder M. The effects of temperature on sodium hypochlorite short-term stability, pulp dissolution capacity, and antimicrobial efficacy. J Endod. 2005;31(9):669-71.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000153846.62144.d2
PMid:16123703

 

9. Virdee SS, Farnell DJJ, Silva MA, Camilleri J, Cooper PR, Tomson PL. The influence of irrigant activation, concentration and contact time on sodium hypochlorite penetration into root dentine: an ex vivo experiment. Int Endod J. 2020;53(7):986-97.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13290
PMid:32163598

 

10. Tonini R, Salvadori M, Audino E, Sauro S, Garo ML, Salgarello S. Irrigating Solutions and Activation Methods Used in Clinical Endodontics: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in oral health. 2022;3:838043.
https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2022.838043
PMid:35174355 PMCid:PMC8841673

 

11. Silva WO, Amoroso-Silva P, Olivares P, Alcalde MP, Alves FRF, Marceliano-Alves MF. Enhancing debris removal in curved canals: a comparative evaluation of XP-endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(12):7523-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05342-2
PMid:37910237

 

12. Plotino G, Özyürek T, Grande NM, Gündoğar M. Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study. Int Endod J. 2019;52(3):343-51.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13002
PMid:30129186

 

13. Bernardes RA, Duarte MAH, Vivan RR, Alcalde MP, Vasconcelos BC, Bramante CM. Comparison of three retreatment techniques with ultrasonic activation in flattened canals using micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J. 2016;49(9):890-7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12522
PMid:26280904

 

14. de Oliveira HF, da Silva Júnior IF, Teixeira LCG, Camilo NG, de Almeida Decurcio D, Guedes OA, et al. Influence of different agitation techniques on bacterial reduction in curved root canals. Aust Endod J. 2023;49(1):104-10.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12623
PMid:35488771

 

15. Nagendrababu V, Murray PE, Ordinola-Zapata R, Peters OA, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, et al. PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: explanation and elaboration. Int Endod J. 2021;54(9):1491-515.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13565
PMid:33982298

 

16. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
PMid:5284110

 

17. Duque JA, Duarte MAH, Canali LCF, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Bernardes RA, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of New Mechanical Irrigant Agitating Devices for Debris Removal from the Canal and Isthmus of Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):326-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.009
PMid:27989584

 

18. Hsu YY, Kim S. The resected root surface. The issue of canal isthmuses. Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Jul;41(3):529-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00066-0
PMid:9248689

 

19. Freire LG, Iglecias EF, Cunha RS, Dos Santos M, Gavini G. Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Hard Tissue Debris Removal after Different Irrigation Methods and Its Influence on the Filling of Curved Canals. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1660-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.001
PMid:26093470

 

20. de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review. J Endod. 2010;36(12):1919-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.055
PMid:21092807

 

21. Paqué F, Al-Jadaa A, Kfir A. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):413-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01991.x
PMid:22188277

 

22. Tanomaru-FIlho M, Torres FFE, Chávez-Andrade GM, Miano LM, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Intermittent or continuous ultrasonically activated irrigation: micro-computed tomographic evaluation of root canal system cleaning. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1541-6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1645-7
PMid:26531193

 

23. Marques AC, Aguiar BA, Frota LM, Guimarães BM, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Vivan RR, et al. Evaluation of Influence of Widening Apical Preparation of Root Canals on Efficiency of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Agitation Protocols: Study by Scanning Electron Microscopy. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(9):1087-94.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2386
PMid:30287709

 

24. Silva EJNL, Carvalho CR, Belladonna FG, Prado MC, Lopes RT, De-Deus G, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):681-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2483-1
PMid:29744723

 

25. Nagendrababu V, Jayaraman J, Suresh A, Kalyanasundaram S, Neelakantan P. Effectiveness of ultrasonically activated irrigation on root canal disinfection: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):655-70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2345-x
PMid:29372445

 

26. Chan R, Versiani MA, Friedman S, Malkhassian G, Sousa-Neto MD, Leoni GB, et al. Efficacy of 3 Supplementary Irrigation Protocols in the Removal of Hard Tissue Debris from the Mesial Root Canal System of Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2019;45(7):923-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.013
PMid:31104820

 

27. De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, de Siqueira Zuolo A, Perez R, Carvalho MS, Souza EM, et al. Micro-CT comparison of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation as final irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris from oval shaped-canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(7):3087-93.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2729-y
PMid:30417226

 

28. Kim KH, Lévesque C, Malkhassian G, Basrani B. Efficacy of the GentleWave System in the removal of biofilm from the mesial roots of mandibular molars before and after minimal instrumentation: An ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2024;57(7):922-32.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14044
PMid:38374488

 

29. van der Sluis LWM, Gambarini G, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J. 2006;39(6):472-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01108.x
PMid:16674742

 

30. Dos Reis S, Cruz VM, Hungaro Duarte MA, da Silveira Bueno CE, Vivan RR, Pelegrine RA, et al. Volumetric Analysis of Irrigant Extrusion in Immature Teeth after Different Final Agitation Techniques. J Endod. 2020;46(5):682-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.014
PMid:32139265