Arbildo-Vega HI, Cruzado-Oliva FH, Coronel-Zubiate FT, Luján-Valencia SA, Meza-Málaga JM, Aguirre-Ipenza R, Echevarria-Goche A, Luján-Urviola E, Castillo-Cornock TB, Serquen-Olano K. Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(8):e995-1005.

doi:10.4317/jced.62997

___

References

1. Lee JCM, Burrow MF, Botelho MG. A Qualitative Analysis of Dentists' Understanding and Management of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions (NCCL). J Dent. 2023;136:104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104640 PMid:37516340

2. Bezerra IM, Brito ACM, de Sousa SA, Santiago BM, Cavalcanti YW, de Almeida LDFD. Glass Ionomer Cements Compared with Composite Resin in Restoration of Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03969 PMid:32462087 PMCid:PMC7243139

3. Teixeira DNR, Thomas RZ, Soares PV, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM, Slot DE. Prevalence of Noncarious Cervical Lesions among Adults: A Systematic Review. J Dent. 2020;95:103285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103285 PMid:32006668

4. Oliveira LML, de Souza CA, Cunha S, Siqueira R, Vajgel BCF, Cimões R. Treatment Efficacy of Gingival Recession Defects Associated with Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022;52:91-115. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2102580129 PMid:35505572 PMCid:PMC9064779

5. Warreth A, Abuhijleh E, Almaghribi MA, Mahwal G, Ashawish A. Tooth Surface Loss: A Review of Literature. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.09.004 PMid:32071532 PMCid:PMC7016226

6. Schroeder M, Correa IC, Bauer J, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of Adhesive Strategy on Clinical Parameters in Cervical Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Dent. 2017;62:36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.006 PMid:28495559

7. Bhundia S, Bartlett D, O'Toole S. Non-Carious Cervical Lesions - Can Terminology Influence Our Clinical Assessment? Br Dent J. 2019;227:985-988. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-1004-1 PMid:31844228

8. Badavannavar AN, Ajari S, Nayak KUS, Khijmatgar S. Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, Clinical Aspect, and Diagnostic-Treatment Modalities: A Review. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31:305-311. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_863_18 PMid:32436913

9. Josic U, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Radovic I, Jacimovic J, Del Bianco F, et al. Is Clinical Behavior of Composite Restorations Placed in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Influenced by the Application Mode of Universal Adhesives? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dent Mater. 2021;37:e503-e521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.017 PMid:34481667

10. Dreweck FDS, Burey A, de Oliveira Dreweck M, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Adhesive Strategies in Cervical Lesions: Systematic Review and a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:2495-2510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03844-5 PMid:33661448

11. Ma KSK, Wang LT, Blatz MB. Efficacy of Adhesive Strategies for Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials over 12 Months of Follow-Up. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67:35-44. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00279 PMid:35691823

12. Patano A, Malcangi G, De Santis M, Morolla R, Settanni V, Piras F, et al. Conservative Treatment of Dental Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Scoping Review. Biomedicines. 2023;11:1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11061530 PMid:37371625 PMCid:PMC10295606

13. Szesz A, Parreiras S, Reis A, Loguercio A. Selective Enamel Etching in Cervical Lesions for Self-Etch Adhesives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.009 PMid:27381814

14. Imber JC, Kasaj A. Treatment of Gingival Recession: When and How? Int Dent J. 2021;71:178-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12617 PMid:34024328 PMCid:PMC9275303

15. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. PRISMA-P Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and Explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647 PMid:25555855

16. Booth A, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L. An International Registry of Systematic-Review Protocols. Lancet Lond Engl. 2011;377:108-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60903-8 PMid:20630580

17. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 PMid:31462531

18. Koç-Vural U, Kerimova-Köse L, Kiremitci A. Long-Term Clinical Comparison of a Resin-Based Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in the Treatment of Cervical Caries Lesions. Odontology. 2025;113:404-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00958-6 PMid:38837034

19. Omoto ÉM, Dos Santos PH, Shinohara MS, de Andrade Carvalho PRM, Catelan A, Fagundes TC. Clinical Performance of Different Adhesion Strategies in Non-Carious Cervical Lesion Restorations: A Four-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. J Dent. 2025;153:105529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105529 PMid:39674308

20. Shehab N, Noaman K, Abdelhady A. Evaluation of the Effect of Occluso-Gingival Distance and Different Shapes of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions on the Clinical Performance of Recent Types of Restorative Materials. (An In Vivo Study). Al-Azhar J. Dent Sci. 2024;27:467-477. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2022.164376.1371

21. Ballal NV, Jalan P, Rai N, Al-Haj Husain N, Özcan M. Evaluation of New Alkasite Based Restorative Material for Restoring Non- Carious Cervical Lesions- Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023;31:72-77. PMid:35659319

22.Schwendicke F, Müller A, Seifert T, Jeggle-Engbert LM, Paris S, Göstemeyer G. Glass Hybrid versus Composite for Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Survival, Restoration Quality and Costs in Randomized Controlled Trial after 3 Years. J Dent. 2021;110:103689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103689 PMid:33979577

23. Nguyen TTD, Nguyen TKH. Comparative evaluation of restorative treatments on non-carious cervical lesions of composite and glass ionomer cement. J Med Pharm. 2020;10:38-45. https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2020.4.5

24. Celik EU, Tunac AT, Yilmaz F. Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomised Controlled Split-Mouth Clinical Trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:1473-1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2575-y PMid:30120605

25. Jassal M, Mittal S, Tewari S. Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2018;43:581-592. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-147-C PMid:29782222

26. Popescu SM, Ţuculină MJ, Manolea HO, Mercuţ R, Scrieciu M. Randomized Clinical Trial of Adhesive Restorations in Non Carious Cervical Lesions. Key Eng. Mater. 2016;695:3-11. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.695.3

27. de Oliveira FG, Machado LS, Rocha EP, de Alexandre RS, Fraga Briso AL, Mazza Sundefeld MLM, et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Composite Resin and a Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: One-Year Results. Int J Clin Dent. 2012;5:155-166.

28. Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni S, Ciaramicoli M, Kiyan V. Randomized Clinical Trial of Two Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Materials: 1-Year Results. Oper. Dent. 2012;37:591-601. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-415-C PMid:22770485

29. Adeleke A, Oginni A. Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2012;2:21-37. PMid:25453001 PMCid:PMC4220485

30. Santiago SL, Passos VF, Vieira AHM, Navarro MFL, Lauris JRP, Franco EB. Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of Resinous Restorative Systems in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. Braz Dent J. 2010;21:229-234. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000300010 PMid:21203706

31. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical Evaluation of Three Adhesive Systems for the Restoration of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. Oper. Dent. 2007;32:11-15. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-50 PMid:17288323

32. Onal B, Pamir T. The Two-Year Clinical Performance of Esthetic Restorative Materials in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:1547-1555. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0085 PMid:16329418

33. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-Year Clinical Performance of Class V Resin-Modified Glass-Lonomer and Resin Composite Restorations. Oper. Dent. 2003;28:477-481. PMid:14531590

34. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R. Tooth-Colored Filling Materials for the Restoration of Cervical Lesions: A 24-Month Follow-up Study. Oper Dent. 2000;25:251-258. PMid:11203827

35. Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T. Clinical Evaluation of Different Adhesive Systems for Restoring Teeth with Erosion Lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 1998;2:58-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050046 PMid:15490777

36. Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T. Longevity of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials: Results of a 10-Year Evaluation. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:373-382. PMid:8941830

37. Boing TF, de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Gomes OMM. Are Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Lesions More Long-Lasting than Resin-Based Composite Resins? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20:435-452. PMid:30349908

38. Carvalho RD, de Nogueira C, Silva AP, Mesquita JA, Salgado KHC, Medeiros MCDS, et al. Periodontal Evaluation in Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement and Resin Composite: A Randomised Controlled Study. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2018;16:131-136. PMid:29736491

39. Tardem C, Albuquerque EG, Lopes LS, Marins SS, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, et al. Clinical Time and Postoperative Sensitivity after Use of Bulk-Fill (Syringe and Capsule) vs. Incremental Filling Composites: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e089. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0089 PMid:31531552

40. Gupta R, Patel A, Pradnya N, Manoj C, Rutuja R, Meghna D. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Using Three Different Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Split-Mouth Design In Vivo Study. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e27861. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27861 PMid:36110475 PMCid:PMC9462524