Sirichamratsakul T, Khemaleelakul W, Sirabanchongkran S. Shear Bond Strength and Enamel Effects of Bioactive Composite Attachments for Clear Aligners. J Clin Exp Dent. 2025;17(11):e1305-13.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.63193

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63193

___

 

References

1. Zheng M, Liu R, Ni Z, Yu Z. Efficiency, effectiveness and treatment stability of clear aligners: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017;20(3):127-133.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12177
PMid:28547915

 

2. Simon M, Keilig L, Schwarze J, Jung BA, Bourauel C. Forces and moments generated by removable thermoplastic aligners: incisor torque, premolar derotation, and molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145(6):728-736.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.015
PMid:24880843

 

3. Alamri A, Salloot Z, Alshaia A, Ibrahim MS. The effect of bioactive glass-enhanced orthodontic bonding resins on prevention of demineralization: a systematic review. Molecules. 2020;25(11):2495.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112495
PMid:32471284 PMCid:PMC7321359

 

4. Bisht S, Khera AK, Raghav P. White spot lesions during orthodontic clear aligner therapy: a scoping review. J Orthod Sci. 2022;11:9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_170_21
PMid:35754408 PMCid:PMC9214451

 

5. Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal JP, Dursun E. Commercially available fluoride-releasing restorative materials: a review and a proposal for classification. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(10):2313.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102313
PMid:32443424 PMCid:PMC7287768

 

6. Pai D, Anirudhmaadhava PA, Ginjupalli K. In vitro evaluation of mechanical properties of Cention N and its comparison with resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorative material as used in primary teeth. Scientific World Journal. 2024;2024:9420336.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9420336
PMid:38205145 PMCid:PMC10776193

 

7. Iftikhar N, Devashish, Srivastava B, Gupta N, Ghambir N, Rashi S. A comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of four different restorative materials: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(1):47-49.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1592
PMid:31496572 PMCid:PMC6710949

 

8. Leódido Gda R, Fernandes HO, Tonetto MR, Presoto CD, Bandéca MC, Firoozmand LM. Effect of fluoride solutions on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):698-702.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000600012
PMid:23338263

 

9. Yaosen C, Mohamed A, Jinbo W, Ziwei Z, Maher A-B, Yan Y. Risk factors of composite attachment loss in orthodontic patients during orthodontic clear aligner therapy: a prospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6620377
PMid:33553424 PMCid:PMC7847320

 

10. Erbas S, Atik E. In vitro comparison of different composite resins for aligner attachment production: amount of adhesive flash, flash removal time, and shear bond strength. J Orofac Orthop. 2025.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-025-00588-9
PMid:40332545

 

11. Chen W, Qian L, Qian Y, Zhang Z, Wen X. Comparative study of three composite materials in bonding attachments for clear aligners. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(4):520-527.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12465
PMid:33386697

 

12. Takara Y, Haga S, Kimura H, Maki K. Mechanical analysis of factors affecting clear aligner removability. Dent Mater J. 2022;41(4):534-544.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-176
PMid:35321972

 

13. Fousiya K, Balagopal VR, Suresh KJ, Kumaran P, Xavier AM, Menon MM. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and flexural strength of self-cured Cention N with dual-cured Cention N: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(2):210-214.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2363
PMid:37457219 PMCid:PMC10338950

 

14. Kim YJ, Kim R, Ferracane JL, Lee IB. Influence of the compliance and layering method on the wall deflection of simulated cavities in bulk-fill composite restoration. Oper Dent. November-December 2016;41(6):e183-e194. 
https://doi.org/10.2341/15-260-L
PMid:27820696

 

15. Jedliński M, Mazur M, Greco M, Belfus J, Grocholewicz K, Janiszewska-Olszowska J. Attachments for the orthodontic aligner treatment-state of the art: a comprehensive systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):4481.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054481
PMid:36901488 PMCid:PMC10001497

 

16. François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal JP, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. J Oral Sci. 2021;63(2):139-144.
https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.20-0448
PMid:33597335

 

17. Kelić K, Par M, Peroš K, Šutej I, Tarle Z. Fluoride-releasing restorative materials: the effect of a resinous coat on ion release. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020;54(4):371-381.
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc54/4/4
PMid:33642601 PMCid:PMC7871432

 

18. Hayashi K, Ishii R, Takamizawa T, Aoki R, Muto R, Suda S, Kamimoto A, Miyazaki M. Influence of etching mode on bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable resin composites to bovine teeth. Dent Mater J. 2024;43(3):338-345.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-226
PMid:38583994

 

19. Sibai N, El Mourad A, Al Suhaibani N, Al Ahmadi R, Al Dosary S. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive flowable resin composite. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:6280624.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6280624
PMid:35572356 PMCid:PMC9106484

 

20. Talan J, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S. Effect of mechanical alteration of enamel surface on shear bond strength of different bonding techniques. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(2):141-144.
https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_163_19
PMid:33384485 PMCid:PMC7720762

 

21. Balagopal S, Nekkanti S, Kaur K. An in vitro evaluation of the mechanical properties and fluoride-releasing ability of a new self-cure filling material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(2):134-139.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3050

 

22. Naz F, Samad Khan A, Kader MA, Al Gelban LOS, Mousa NMA, Asiri RSH, Hakeem AS. Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(7):666-673.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012
PMid:34803317 PMCid:PMC8589597

 

23. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials: a review. Aust Dent J. September 2004;49(3):112-121.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2004.tb00059.x
PMid:15497354

 

24. Verma V, Mathur S, Sachdev V, Singh D. Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(6):550-553
https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19
PMid:34083907 PMCid:PMC8095699

 

25. Yazici AR, Yildirim Z, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B, Antonson SA, Antonson DE. Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(3):280-286.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698962
PMid:22904656 PMCid:PMC3420835

 

26. Gupta N, Jaiswal S, Nikhil V, Gupta S, Jha P, Bansal P. Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(3):296-299.
https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_74_19
PMid:31367117 PMCid:PMC6632620

 

27. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater. 2004;20(9):789-795.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009
PMid:15451233

 

28. Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, Monaco A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;29:295-308.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013
PMid:24135128

 

29. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89-99. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
PMid:10071465