Valencia-Linares DR, Velasquez-Carhuapoma AA, Dulanto-Vargas JA, Carranza-Samanez KM. Cost efficiency of calcium silicate and glass ionomer cements in pulpotomies of first mandibular primary molars. J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(9):e1035-45.

doi:10.4317/jced.63481

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63481

References

1. Camilleri J. Staining potential of Neo MTA Plus, MTA Plus, and Biodentine used for pulpotomy procedures. J Endod. 2015;41(7):1139-1145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.032
PMid:25887807


2. Abd Al Gawad RY, Hanafy RMH. Success rate of three capping materials used in pulpotomy of primary molars: A randomized clinical trial. Saudi Dent J. 2020;33(7):560-567.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.007
PMid:34803301 PMCid:PMC8589572


3. Boutsiouki C, Frankenberger R, Krämer N. Clinical and radiographic success of (partial) pulpotomy and pulpectomy in primary teeth: A systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(4):273-285.
https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2021.22.04.4
PMid:35034465


4. Jasani B, Musale P, Jasani B. Efficacy of Biodentine versus formocresol in pulpotomy of primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2022;53(8):698-705
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b3240043
PMid:35976738


5. Lin P, Chen H, Wang Y, Tu Y. Primary molar pulpotomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1060-1077.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.001
PMid:24513112

6. Coll JA, Dhar V, Chen CY, Crystal YO, Guelmann M, Marghalani AA, AlShamali S, Xu Z, Glickman GN, Wedeward R. Use of vital pulp therapies in primary teeth 2024. Pediatr Dent. 2024;46(1):13-26.
PMid:38449041


7. Palczewska-Komsa M, Kaczor-Wiankowska K, Nowicka A. New bioactive calcium silicate cement mineral trioxide aggregate repair high plasticity (MTA HP)-a systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(16):4573.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164573
PMid:34443098 PMCid:PMC8398617

8. Stringhini Junior E, Dos Santos MGC, Oliveira LB, Mercadé M. MTA and Biodentine for primary teeth pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(4):1967-1976.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2616-6
PMid:30238414


9. Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Veettil SK, Jinatongthai P, Gutmann JL. Efficacy of Biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molar pulpotomies-a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19(1):17-27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.05.002
PMid:30926099

10. Ahuja S, Surabhi K, Gandhi K, Kapoor R, Malhotra R, Kumar D. Comparative evaluation of success of Biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate with formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments in primary molars: An in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(2):167-173.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1740
PMid:32742096 PMCid:PMC7366755


11. Youssef A, Elsherief S. Evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of a new Harvard MTA compared to MTA Flow and ProRoot MTA on human gingival fibroblasts. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(7):679-686.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.009
PMid:34803319 PMCid:PMC8589600

12. Ford TR, Torabinejad M, McKendry DJ, Hong CU, Kariyawasam SP. Use of mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of furcal perforations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79(6):756-763.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80313-0
PMid:7621036


13. Chen Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Zhou F, Deng J, Zou J, Wang Y. Materials for pulpotomy in immature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):227.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0917-z
PMid:31647004 PMCid:PMC6813108

14. Tawil PZ, Duggan DJ, Galicia JC. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): Its history, composition, and clinical applications. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(4):247-252.
PMid:25821936


15. Zafar K, Jamal S, Ghafoor R. Bio-active cements-mineral trioxide aggregate-based calcium silicate materials: A narrative review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(3):497-504.
https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.16942
PMid:32207434

16. Mokhtari H, Lotfi M, Rahbar M, Mozafari A, Badri-Nozadi MH, Mokhtari-Zonouzi HR. Comparison of setting time of white mineral trioxide aggregate with and without disodium hydrogen phosphate at different liquid-to-powder ratios. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(8):988-991.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2370
PMid:30150502


17. Bravo Eslava LM, Gallardo Gutiérrez CA. Comparison of the porosity characteristics of Portland cement, mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine by scanning electron microscopy. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021;9(1):e043.
https://doi.org/10.21142/2523-2754-0901-2021-043
PMid:38464406 PMCid:PMC10919816

18. Slaboseviciute M, Vasiliauskaite N, Drukteinis S, Martens L, Rajasekharan S. Discoloration potential of Biodentine: A systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(22):6861.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226861
PMid:34832263 PMCid:PMC8619462

19. Moskovitz M, Tickotsky N, Dassa M, Fux-Noy A, Shmueli A, Halperson E, Ram D. Zinc oxide zinc sulfate versus zinc oxide eugenol as pulp chamber filling materials in primary molar pulpotomies. Children (Basel). 2021;8(9):776.
https://doi.org/10.3390/children8090776
PMid:34572208 PMCid:PMC8469668

20. El Meligy OA, Alamoudi NM, Allazzam SM, El-Housseiny A. Biodentine™ versus formocresol pulpotomy technique in primary molars: A 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):3.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0702-4
PMid:30612569 PMCid:PMC6322259

21. Firoozi P, Salman BN, Aslaminabadi N. Clinical and radiographic comparison of Biodentine and Formocresol: An updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(6):855-867.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00715-9
PMid:35596042

22. Donly KJ, Méndez MJC, Contreras CI, Liu JA. Prospective randomized clinical trial of primary molar crowns: 36-month results. Am J Dent. 2020;33(3):165-168.
PMid:32470244

23. Schmalz G, Schwendicke F, Hickel R, Platt JA. Alternative direct restorative materials for dental amalgam: A concise review based on an FDI policy statement. Int Dent J. 2024;74(4):661-668.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2023.11.004
PMid:38071154 PMCid:PMC11287089

24. Peric T, Markovic E, Markovic D, Petrovic B. Meta-analysis of in-vitro bonding of glass-ionomer restorative materials to primary teeth. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(14):3915.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143915
PMid:34300834 PMCid:PMC8304208

25. Amend S, Boutsiouki C, Bekes K, Kloukos D, Gizani S, Lygidakis NN, Frankenberger R, Krämer N. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: A systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(5):761-776.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00725-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4
PMid:36056991 PMCid:PMC9637617

26. Abukabbos H, Tomar S, Guelmann M. Cost estimates for bioactive cement pulpotomies and crowns in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2018;40(1):51-55.
PMid:29482683

27. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650-658.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515573272
PMid:25740856 PMCid:PMC11811587

28. Vernazza CR, Birch S, Pitts NB. Reorienting oral health services to prevention: Economic perspectives. J Dent Res. 2021;100(6):576-582.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520986794
PMid:33478327 PMCid:PMC8138330

29. Manohar S, Bazaz N, Neeraja G, Subramaniam P, Sneharaj N. A comparative evaluation of four regenerative materials for pulpotomy in primary molars: An in vivo study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022;19:102.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.363532
PMid:36618772 PMCid:PMC9811967

30. Muhamedagic B, Muhamedagic L, Masic I. Dental office waste - public health and ecological risk. Mater Sociomed. 2009;21(1):35-38.
https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2009.21.35-39
PMid:24133379 PMCid:PMC3796776