Díaz-Quevedo AA, Arriola-Guillén LE. The most influential cephalometric factors affecting variations in the nasolabial angle: A cross-sectional regression study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(1):e67-71.

doi:10.4317/jced.63552

___

References

1. Demirovic K, Habibovic J, Dzemidzic V, Tiro A, Nakas E. Comparison of oral health-related quality of life in treated and non-treated orthodontic patients. Med Arch. 2019;73(2):113-7. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2019.73.113-117 PMid:31391699 PMCid:PMC6643358

2. Chen M, Feng ZC, Liu X, Li ZM, Cai B, Wang DW. Impact of malocclusion on oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(6):986-91. https://doi.org/10.2319/101714-743.1 PMid:25531421 PMCid:PMC8612031

3. Jha N, Bamal R, Khairwa MK, Kalawat A, Yadav L, Sharma S. Evaluation of the influence of nasolabial angle, upper sulcus depth, and nasal tip protrusion in the perception of facial attractiveness. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S329-34. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_529_23 PMid:38595513 PMCid:PMC11000938

4. Droubi M, Al-Moudallal Y, Mouhamad M, Al-Nerabieah Z. Changes in Nasolabial angle and Mentolabial angle after lips augmentation with hyaluronic acid: Clinical Study. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2020;1012-6. https://doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-20000201

5. Naini FB, Cobourne MT, McDonald F, Wertheim D. Aesthetic impact of the upper component of the nasolabial angle: A quantitative investigation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2015;27(4):470-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2014.05.004

6. Quinzi V, Paskay LC, D'Andrea N, Albani A, Monaco A, Saccomanno S. Evaluation of the nasolabial angle in orthodontic diagnosis: A systematic review. Appl Sci (Basel). 2021;11(6):2531. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062531

7. Freilinger G. Proportions of the aesthetic face. Acta Chir Austriaca. 1985;17(3):61-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656047

8. Pop SI, Bud E, Mártha K, Mureșan IÉ, Jánosi KM, Dósa B, et al. Cephalometric and photographic evaluation of the nasolabial angle in orthodontically treated patients: An observational cohort study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020132 PMid:39857016 PMCid:PMC11763396

9. Aljabaa AH. Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2019;11:9-17. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S190230 PMid:30679927 PMCid:PMC6338237

10. Gołębiowski M, Świątkowska A, Pastuszak P, Rahnama M. Relationship between selected cephalometric parameters, nasolabial angle and its components in adolescent females. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061199 PMid:36980507 PMCid:PMC10047291

11. Garg H, Khundrakpam D, Saini V, Rukshana R, Kaldhari K, Kaur J. Relationship of Nasolabial Angle with Maxillary Incisor Proclination and Upper Lip Thickness in North Indian Population. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(5):489-92. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2432 PMid:36865728 PMCid:PMC9973106

12. Saki M, Danaei SM, Sardarian A, Shavakhi M. Changes of nasolabial angle from rest to smile in relation to cephalometric parameters. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(4):434-42.

13. Gupta S, Bajjad AA, Sharma A, Ummae Hani S, Kumar A, Pandey V. Correlation of the upper nasolabial angle with skeletal patterns and nasal morphology in Indian adults: An observational study. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e68857. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68857

14. Jankowska A, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Grocholewicz K. Nasal morphology and its correlation to craniofacial morphology in cephalometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063064 PMid:33809695 PMCid:PMC8002216

15. Terán K, Alvial L, Linker K, Beratto O, Vergara C. Asociación entre la inclinación sagital del incisivo central superior y el ángulo nasolabial en ortodoncia. Int J Inter Dent. 2023;16(1):34-6. https://doi.org/10.4067/S2452-55882023000100034

16. Paryani P, Agrawal SS, Chachada A, Jain M, Bothra S, Shrivastava S, et al. Correlation between nasolabial angle and maxillary incisors inclination in 18-25-year-old Chhattisgarh population using pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms: A retrospective study. Indian J Dent Res. 2023;34(4):413-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_157_23 PMid:38739823

17. Perović T, Blažej Z, Jovanović I. The influence of antero-posterior dentoskeletal pattern on the value of nasal soft tissue angles: a cephalometric study. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021;80(3):657-64. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2020.0087 PMid:32789846

18. Singh S, Thombare RU, Raut AW. Comparison of nasolabial angle in young adults and middle aged dentate and elderly edentulous subjects. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res. 2015;3(3):14-18.