Perween N,
Khurana PRS, Aggarwal A, Chaudhary A, Kumar KN, Hassan S, Sekhar AR. Evaluation
of ChatGPT’s Accuracy, Repeatability, and Reasoning Ability in Prosthodontics
Education: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study with Prosthodontists. J Clin Exp
Dent. 2026;18(3):e342-50.
doi:10.4317/jced.63583
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63583
___
References
|
1.
Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry:
Chances and Challenges. J Dent Res. 2020;99(7):769-774. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Eysenbach G. The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial
Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for
Papers. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e46885. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Shan T, Tay FR, Gu L. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry. J
Dent Res. 2021;100(3):232-244. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Krusche M, Callhoff J, Knitza J, Ruffer N. Diagnostic accuracy of a large
language model in rheumatology: comparison of physician and ChatGPT-4.
Rheumatol Int. 2024;44(2):303-306. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Antaki F, Touma S, Milad D, El-Khoury J, Duval R. Evaluating the Performance
of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology: An Analysis of Its Successes and Shortcomings.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023;3(4):100324. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Yeo YH, Samaan JS, Ng WH, Ting PS, Trivedi H, Vipani A, et al. Assessing the
performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and
hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(3):721-732. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, Barmak AB, Gallucci GO, Att W, et al.
Artificial intelligence models for tooth-supported fixed and removable
prosthodontics: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(2):276-292. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Sallam M, Salim NA, Barakat M, Al-Tammemi AB. ChatGPT applications in
medical, dental, pharmacy, and public health education: A descriptive study
highlighting the advantages and limitations. Narra J. 2023;3(1):e103. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Shrivastava S, Gupta A, Nanda P, Kaur R, Gupta M, Sharma A, et al.
Performance of ChatGPT in dentistry: a cross-sectional, multi-specialty and
multi-centric study. Braz J Oral Sci. 2025;24:e254954. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Guides to standards in prosthetic dentistry. A report by the British Society
for the Study of Prosthetic Dentistry. Br Dent J. 1981;150(6):167-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed
and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess.
1994;6(4):284-290. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater
reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index
of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther.
1997;77(7):745-50. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Freire Y, Santamaría Laorden A, Orejas Pérez J, Gómez Sánchez M, Díaz-Flores
García V, Suárez A. ChatGPT performance in prosthodontics: Assessment of
accuracy and repeatability in answer generation. J Prosthet Dent.
2024;131(4):659.e1-659.e6. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Suárez A, Díaz-Flores García V, Algar J, Gómez Sánchez M, Llorente de Pedro
M, Freire Y. Unveiling the ChatGPT phenomenon: Evaluating the consistency and
accuracy of endodontic question answers. Int Endod J. 2024;57(1):108-113. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, et al. How Does
ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)?
The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge
Assessment. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e45312. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Kahraman F, Aktas A, Bayrakceken S, Çakar T, Tarcan HS, Bayram B, et al.
Physicians' ethical concerns about artificial intelligence in medicine: a
qualitative study: "The final decision should rest with a human".
Front Public Health. 2024;12:1428396. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Umer F, Habib S. Critical Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in Endodontics:
A Scoping Review. J Endod. 2022;48(2):152-160. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, Sillos C, De Leon L, Elepaño C, et al.
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education
using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Liu M, Okuhara T, Huang W, Ogihara A, Nagao HS, Okada H, et al. Large
Language Models in Dental Licensing Examinations: Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis. Int Dent J. 2025;75(1):213-222. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Mago J, Sharma M. The Potential Usefulness of ChatGPT in Oral and Maxillofacial
Radiology. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42133. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Ahmed WM, Azhari AA, Fawaz KA, Ahmed HM, Alsadah ZM, Majumdar A, et al.
Artificial intelligence in the detection and classification of dental caries.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(5):1326-1332. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Mohammad-Rahimi H, Motamedian SR, Rohban MH, Krois J, Uribe SE, Mahmoudinia
E, et al. Deep learning for caries detection: A systematic review. J Dent.
2022;122:104115. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Suárez A, Freire Y, Suárez M, Díaz-Flores García V, Andreu-Vázquez C,
Thuissard Vasallo IJ, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Large
Language Models in the Analysis of Oral Pathology. Oral Dis. 2025;31:70009. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Kıyak YS. ChatGPT's ability or prompt quality: what determines the success of
generating multiple-choice questions. Acad Pathol. 2024;11(2):100119. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Freire Y, Santamaría Laorden A, Orejas Pérez J, Ortiz Collado I, Gómez
Sánchez M, Thuissard Vasallo IJ, et al. Evaluating the influence of prompt
formulation on the reliability and repeatability of ChatGPT in
implant-supported prostheses. PLoS One. 2025;20(5):e0323086. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Alkaissi H, McFarlane SI. Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications
in Scientific Writing. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35179. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Jaleel A, Aziz U, Farid G, Zahid Bashir M, Mirza TR, Khizar Abbas SM, et al.
Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical
Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e68070. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Kochanek K, Skarzynski H, Jedrzejczak WW. Accuracy and Repeatability of
ChatGPT Based on a Set of Multiple-Choice Questions on Objective Tests of
Hearing. Cureus. 2024;16(5):e59857. |
|