Neves PTO,
Diniz JV, Lins LBC, Gomes JML, Bruno Casado GS, Leão RS. Microbiological
behavior of 3D printing materials for indirect restorations: A scoping review.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(2):e270-8.
doi:10.4317/jced.63656
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63656
___
References
|
1.
Arutyunov S, Kirakosyan L, Dubova L, Kharakh Y, Malginov N, Akhmedov G, et al.
Microbial adhesion to dental polymers for conventional, computer-aided
subtractive and additive manufacturing: A comparative in vitro study. J Funct
Biomater. 2022;13:42. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Özer NE, Şahin Z, Yıkıcı C, Duyan S, Kılıçarslan MA. Bacterial adhesion to
composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing.
Odontology. 2024;112:460-471. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Giti R, Dabiri S, Motamedifar M, Derafshi R. Surface roughness, plaque
accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials
fabricated by different methods. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0249551. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Arnold C, Sigg H, Schmidlin PR, Roos M. Surface quality of 3D-printed models
as a function of various printing parameters. Materials. 2019;12:1970. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Jin G, Ravichandran V, Shim MS, Kim JE. Incorporating an artificially
synthesized fluoride complex into urethane-acrylate-based 3D printing resin:
Effects on mechanical properties, cytotoxicity, antimicrobial actions, and
its long-term fluoride-releasing properties. J Dent. 2024;150:105363. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Aati S, Shrestha B, Fawzy A. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial efficiency of
ZrO2 nanoparticles reinforced 3D printed resins. Dent Mater. 2022;38:1432-1442. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Marigo L, Gallina G, Malacarne-Zanon J, Bossù M, Polimeni A. Influences of
different air-inhibition coatings on monomer release, microhardness, and
color stability of two composite materials. Biomed Res Int.
2019;2019:4240264. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Aati S, Chauhan A, Shrestha B, Rajan SM, Aati H, Fawzy A. Development of 3D
printed dental resin nanocomposite with graphene nanoplatelets enhanced
mechanical properties and induced drug-free antimicrobial activity. Dent
Mater. 2022;38:1921-1933. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Mangal U, Min YJ, Seo JY, Kim DE, Cha JY, Lee KJ, et al. Changes in
tribological and antibacterial properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)-based
3D-printed intra-oral appliances by incorporating nanodiamonds. J Mech Behav
Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103992. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Wang S, Dai J, Xu S, Li P, Fouda AM, Yilmaz B, et al. Surface
characteristics, cytotoxicity, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed hybrid
resin-ceramic materials for definitive restoration. J Dent. 2025;152:105436. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Mazurek-Popczyk J, Nowicki A, Arkusz K, Pałka Ł, Zimoch-Korzycka A,
Baldy-Chudzik K. Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to
fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing
technology. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:442. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Lins LBC, Silva LFD, Araújo RM, Leite FC, Silva-Neto JP, Neves FD. Effect of
three-dimensional print angle on integrity of interim crowns: A systematic
review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(5):1567-1576. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Tsareva TV, Khabibullina LF, Rogova SV. Clinical significance of adhesion of
oral microbiota representatives to polymer materials recommended for dental
computer milling and 3D printing technologies. Clinical Dentistry.
2020;3:113-118. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Brun P, Rosso S, Gattazzo A, Stellini E. Comparison
of the flexural and surface properties of milled, 3D-printed, and
heat-polymerized PMMA resins for denture bases: An in vitro study. J
Prosthodont Res. 2022;66:502-508. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Freitas RFCP, Neves ACC, da Silva RHA, Noritomi PY, Urban VM. Physical,
mechanical, and anti-biofilm formation properties of CAD-CAM milled or 3D
printed denture base resins: In vitro analysis. J Prosthodont. 2023;32:38-44. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework.
Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19-32. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11:
Scoping reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: JBI. 2020. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA
extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann
Intern Med. 2018;169:467-473. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Ribeiro AKC, Freitas RFCP, Carvalho IHG, Miranda LM, Silva NR, Dantas de
Almeida LF, et al. Flexural strength, surface roughness, micro-CT analysis,
and microbiological adhesion of a 3D-printed temporary crown material. Clin
Oral Investig. 2023;27:2207-2212. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Arutyunov AS, Danilova MA, Gryaznova MV. Features and significance of
bacterial and fungal adhesion in the oral cavity as a stage in the formation
of microbial biofilm on dental polymer materials. Stomatologiia.
2020;99:79-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Bächle J, Merle C, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Bacterial adhesion on dental
polymers as a function of manufacturing techniques. Materials. 2023;16:2373. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Kumari MK, Sinha A, Prasad A, Reddy M. A comparative analysis of bacterial
adhesion on different long-term provisional fixed prostheses fabricated by
CAD/CAM milling, 3D printing, and heat cure technique: An in vivo study. J
Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16:S921-S923. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Taşin S, Güvenir M, Ismatullaev A. Effects of surface characteristics of
conventionally manufactured, CAD/CAM milled, and 3D-printed interim materials
on adherence of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Cumhur Dent J.
2023;26:227-234. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Kim HT, Jang YS, Lee HK, Lee JW. Surface properties and biofilm formation on
resins for subtractively and additively manufactured fixed dental prostheses
aged in artificial saliva: Effect of material type and surface finishing. J
Prosthet Dent. 2025;133:594.e1-594.e9. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Parakaw T, Supanimitkul K, Lertwattanaruk K, Piwat S, Pithayanukul P.
Biocompatibility and biofilm formation on conventional and CAD/CAM
provisional implant restorations. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:718. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Simoneti DM, Pereira-Cenci T, Dos Santos MBF. Comparison of material
properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing
and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:168-172. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Liu SA, Zhang M, Ren B, Zhang Y, Li J, Wang X, et al. 3D printing dental
composite resins with sustaining antibacterial ability. J Mater Sci.
2019;54:3309-3318. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Elmalah NS, El-Fallal AA, El-Sebaie HT, El-Din MS. Effect of nanomodified 3D
printed photopolymerizable resin on flexural strength, color, and
antimicrobial efficacy: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent.
2024;132:268.e1-268.e8. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Yue J, Zhao S, Zhang J, Dong Y, Guo X, Li X. 3D-printable antimicrobial
composite resins. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25:6756-6767. |
|
|
|
|
|
30.
Kim HT, Jo YH, Jee EB, Yoon HI, Yilmaz B. Effect of post-polymerization time
and atmosphere on surface properties and biofilm formation in additively
manufactured resins for definitive restorations. J Dent. 2024;147:105143. |
|