de Matos JDM,
Lopes GRS, Ramos NC, Sinhoreti MAC, Borges ALS, Queiroz DA, Bottino MA. Fatigue
Survival and Biomechanical Behavior of Two-piece Titanium and Zirconia Dental
Implants. J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(5):e647-54.
doi:10.4317/jced.64022
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.64022
___
References
|
1.
Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. Wear at the
titanium titanium and the titanium zirconia implant abutment interface: a comparative
in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2012;28(12):1215-1220. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Hanawa T. Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: a review. Dent Mater.
2020;39(1):24-36. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Vaghela H, Eaton K. Is zirconia a viable alternative to titanium for dental
implantology? Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2022;30(1):1-13. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Cao Y, Yu C, Wu Y, Li L, Li C. Long term survival and peri implant health of
titanium implants with zirconia abutments: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(8):883-892. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Ohman A.
Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience
from a 10 year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Sen N, Us YO. Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus
zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs. J Prosthet Dent.
2019;122(3):315.e1-315.e7. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Sadowsky SJ. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant
prosthodontics? A review. Dent Mater. 2020;36(1):1-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials.
1999;20(1):1-25. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Bazal Bonelli S, Castro Janeiro M, Ríos Barbero J, Cano Sánchez de Tembleque
M, López Quiles J, Meniz García C, et al. Clinical behavior of two piece
zirconia implants: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.
2025;30(3):e313-e321. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Matos JD, Arcila LV, Ortiz LP, Lopes GR, Anami LC, Ramos NC, et al. Hybrid
abutment during prosthetic planning and oral rehabilitation. Minerva Dent
Oral Sci. 2022;71(2):107-116. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Ožiūnas R, Sakalauskienė J, Staišiūnas L, Žekonis G, Žilinskas J, Janužis G.
Physical and mechanical changes on titanium base of three different types of
hybrid abutment after cyclic loading. J Adv Prosthodont. 2023;15(1):33-43. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Hanes B, Feitosa S, Phasuk K, Levon JA, Morton D, Lin WS. Fracture resistance
behaviors of titanium zirconium and zirconia implants. J Prosthodont.
2022;31(5):441-446. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Osman RB, Swain MV, Atieh M, Ma S, Duncan W. Ceramic implants (Y TZP): are
they a viable alternative to titanium implants for the support of
overdentures? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(12):1366-1377. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Siddiqi A, Kieser JA, De Silva RK, Thomson WM, Duncan WJ. Soft and hard tissue
response to zirconia versus titanium one piece implants placed in alveolar
and palatal sites: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat
Res. 2015;17(3):483-496. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Aragoneses J, Valverde NL, Fernandez Dominguez M, Mena Alvarez J, Rodriguez
C, Gil J, et al. Relevant aspects of titanium and zirconia dental implants
for their fatigue and osseointegration behaviors. Materials (Basel).
2022;15(11):4036. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Moreira A, Madeira S, Buciumeanu M, Fialho J, Carvalho A, Silva F, Monteiro FJ,
Caramês J. Design and surface characterization of micropatterned silica
coatings for zirconia dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
2022;126:105060. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Bormann KH, Gellrich NC, Kniha H, Schild S, Weingart D, Gahlert M. A
prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide
dental implants in single tooth edentulous area: 3 year follow up. BMC Oral
Health. 2018;18(1):181. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Roehling S, Astasov Frauenhoffer M, Hauser Gerspach I, Braissant O, Woelfler
H, Waltimo T, et al. In vitro biofilm formation on titanium and zirconia
implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 2017;88(3):298-307. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Chiou LL, Panariello BHD, Hamada Y, Gregory RL, Blanchard SB, Duarte S.
Comparison of in vitro biofilm formation on titanium and zirconia implants.
Biomed Res Int. 2023;15:8728499. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Kohal RJ, Patzelt SB, Butz F, Sahlin H. One piece zirconia oral implants: one
year results from a prospective case series. Part 2: Three unit fixed dental prosthesis
reconstruction. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(5):553-562. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Freifrau von Maltzahn N, Bernard S, Kohorst P. Two part implant abutments
with titanium and ceramic components: surface modification affects retention
forces - an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(9):903-909. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Cionca N, Müller N, Mombelli A. Two piece zirconia implants supporting all
ceramic crowns: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2015;26(4):413-418. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Sivaraman K, Chopra A, Narayan AI, Balakrishnan D. Is zirconia a viable
alternative to titanium for oral implant? A critical review. J Prosthodont
Res. 2018;62(2):121-133. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Rohr N, Brunner S, Märtin S, Fischer J. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer
on retention of polymer infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one piece zirconia
implant. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(1):138-145. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res.
2018;97(2):140-147. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Tolentino L, Sukekava F, Garcez Filho J, Tormena M, Lima LA, Araújo MG. One
year follow up of titanium/zirconium alloy versus commercially pure titanium
narrow diameter implants placed in the molar region of the mandible: a
randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):393-398. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Adolfi D, Tribst JPM, Adolfi M, Dal Piva AMO, Saavedra GSFA, Bottino MA.
Lithium disilicate crown, zirconia hybrid abutment and platform switching to
improve the esthetics in anterior region: a case report. Clin Cosmet Investig
Dent. 2020;12:31-40. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Matos JDM, Lopes GDRS, Queiroz DA, Pereira ALJ, Sinhoreti MAC, Ramos NC, et
al. Influence of the PEEK abutments on mechanical behavior of internal
connection single implants. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(22):8133. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Matos JDM, Gomes LS, de Carvalho Ramos N, Queiroz DA, Tribst JPM, Campos TMB,
et al. Influence of CAD/CAM abutment heights on the biomechanical behavior of
zirconia single crowns. Metals. 2022;12(12):2025. |
|
|
|
|
|
30.
Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the
marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with
different methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(4):536-542. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.
Baladhandayutham B, Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Fracture load of ceramic
restorations after fatigue loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(2):266-271. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.
Guilardi LF, Pereira G, Vallau AS, Silva IA, Giordani JC, Valandro LF, et al.
Fatigue failure load of a bonded simplified monolithic feldspathic ceramic:
influence of hydrofluoric acid etching and thermocycling. Oper Dent.
2020;45(1):E21-E31. |
|
|
|
|
|
33.
Bordin D, Cury AADB, Faot F. Influence of abutment collar height and implant
length on stress distribution in single crowns. Braz Dent J.
2019;30(3):238-243. |
|
|
|
|
|
34.
Wiskott HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a
working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin
Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(6):429-444. |
|
|
|
|
|
35.
International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry: dynamic fatigue
test for endosseous dental implants. ISO 14801 3rd ed. Geneva: ISO. 2016; p.
1-10. |
|
|
|
|
|
36.
Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Prandtner O, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF. Metal free
implant supported single tooth restorations. Part II: hybrid abutment crowns
and material selection. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(4):260-269. |
|
|
|
|
|
37.
Payer M, Heschl A, Koller M, Arnetzl G, Lorenzoni M, Jakse N. All ceramic
restoration of zirconia two piece implants - a randomized controlled clinical
trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):371-376. |
|
|
|
|
|
38.
Martins JNR, Martins RF, Braz-Fernandes FM, Silva EJN L. What meaningful
information are the instruments mechanical testing giving us? a comprehensive
review. J Endod. 2022;48(8):985-1004. |
|
|
|
|
|
39.
Silva KRN, Joly JC, Peruzzo DC, Napimoga MH, Martinez EF. Influence of
transmucosal height on loss of prosthetic abutment torque after mechanical
cycling. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44(6):423-426. |
|
|
|
|
|
40.
Spazzin AO, Henrique GE, Nóbilo MA, Consani RL, Correr Sobrinho L, Mesquita
MF. Effect of retorque on loosening torque of prosthetic screws under two
levels of fit of implant-supported dentures. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(1):12-17. |
|
|
|
|
|
41.
Cardoso M, Torres MF, Lourenço EJ, de Moraes Telles D, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro
RF. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening
cycles: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(4):475-480. |
|
|
|
|
|
42.
Steiner M, Mitsias ME, Ludwig K, Kern M. In vitro evaluation of a mechanical
chewing simulator. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):494-499. |
|
|
|
|
|
43.
Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley
& Sons; 1999. |
|
|
|
|
|
44.
Datte CE, Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Nishioka RS, Bottino MA, Evan- gelhista
ADM, Monteiro FMM, Borges ALS. Influence of different re- storative materials
on the stress distribution in dental implants. J Clin Exp Dent.
2018;10(5):e439-44. |
|